842:, which I'm sure has been cited before in this discussion somewhere. Multiple, non-trivial mentions in reliable, third-party sources is always the standard, which is currently not what we're seeing here. To expand on the other-stuff-exists argument (Fylbecatulous is correct that the existence of other articles in parlous states isn't an argument in favour of keeping another article in a similar state - and that's true whether the articles in question are of magazines, animals or Foreign Ministers of Nauru), the publication in a scientific journal that a new species has been discovered is an order of magnitude more significant than a passing mention of this magazine in a more general discussion about drug laws around the world. I might also pick up on the point regarding advertising/promotion and indicate that it's not just a case of "are you trying to make money out of this?" If the subject of the article is a relatively minor publication (and, no offence, but it looks that way at the moment), a Knowledge (XXG) article can easily be seen as promoting that publication and/or the agenda of that publication. The fact that there's no link saying "click here to subscribe" doesn't prevent it from being promotional in aspect.
319:. The guidelines of Knowledge (XXG) do not set 'n minimum number of sources, although I have included other mentions, notability requires that others are writing about the publication and this has been proven true, even though these mention are not in depth reviews of the publication. I find it hard to accept that some of the voters, in nomination for deletion, purely rely on Google Search to disprove notability. Although Google searches do help, I do not believe it should be the only criteria votes are based upon. There are many other sources that write about the magazine that are not online searchable. This includes Twitter and Facebook. Where the magazine receives the most notice / mentions. Please do understand also that local mainstream news sources do not reference or mention the magazine because of the illegality of dagga (cannabis) in South Africa. Hence why most local sources are subject related (part of the cannabis culture) but still independent organizations. Thank you again for engaging with me directly on this matter.--
915:
The main principles of the notability guide ask does the subject receive notice and to what geographical extent does the notice reach. In this case the local South
African magazine is recognized internationally even though it has not received in depth coverage, the audience and the reliable independent sources already added must be considered. For it to be a advertisement something must be sold for monetary gain or purposely written for promoting rather than record keeping of notable events and organizations. My edits show the later and that is my only intentions on Knowledge (XXG). None of the content suggest pushing for dagga legalization agenda. Those allegations are unfounded. Have a great evening. --
1590:
is based on a personal attack rather than that of a policy based discussion. I was a little but frustrated but none of my actions or opinions are intent of personal allegations. The truth however is that Rob has personal connections to FOGFA and the Dagga
Magazine has recently published incriminating evidence of this organization hence why I called Rob out on his reasoning for nomination that is based on personal opinion rather than Knowledge (XXG) Guidelines, I unconditionally retract all statements that infer personal allegation and humbly apologize for any actions that may be deemed as such. Please see
822:
been strange to those who work with this on a daily basis. I am regrettably sorry for that but it is teething problems that come to light from new & inexperienced wikipedians. Regarding coverage what would you suggest is a sufficient level of coverage to qualify? For example some animal articles have no coverage except for a single source from the publishing of the finding. Certainly all articles on
Knowledge (XXG) should have some general equality when it comes to applying the general notabilty guidelines?--
785:. The sources as extant don't amount to the level of coverage required to establish notability. The fact that the magazine is about something which is illegal in its country of publication is neither here nor there when the sources are only passing mentions. I'm also concerned to some extent about the assorted format changes made to this AfD, although they may simply be good-faith efforts by someone "new to the game".
870:: Nothing in the article or the existing sources is newsworthy or notable except to promote the magazine or the push for legalisation for dagga. It is up to the article creator to provide the needed relaible sources to support their claims made in the text or in arguments in this discussion. I agree (since I work with feline (cats) articles, some are poorly sourced). But this is invoking
1589:
Sorry but the guidelines for nomination of deletion clearly state that the outcome is based on logical policy based discussion. Therefor let me rephrase my previous statement. The failure or success of an
Indiegogo campaign does not determine whether a subject is notable, therefore the comment by Rob
1254:
I didn't know one is not allowed to rebut statements in-line, however the AfD guidelines does ask that the outcome be determined by policy-based arguments. Hence why the points I have made thus far is very important to reach a logical conclusion based on the guidelines and not purely on statistics of
520:
Thank you for your comment, please note the inclusion of the closed
Indiegogo campaign is entered as part of the history of this publication. Please take note that dagga is still illegal in South Africa and just like you won't find local coverage of apartheid heroes or organization fighting apartheid
1287:
If anyone's statements in nomination for deletion can be rebutted with policy based arguments I have an obligation do so and therefore it is not an indication of trying to prove my disagreement. Please accept that everything I do on
Knowledge (XXG) is in good faith. If I was convinced by what others
821:
Thank you for your commentary, the formating was done in good faith, this is my second encounter with a nomination for deletion, however my first on the english wiki. The formatting changes were made for clarity (was much clearer format for myself to grasp in totality. I realize now that it may have
1277:
example shows that a trivial mention is when the name of the subject is merely mentioned. Although a quotation is not in-depth coverage it is still not a trivial mention as there is a powerful message behind any quotation. Also note that this quote reference is not the only reference that has been
914:
The comparison was only made in an attempt to ascertain what amount of references is required to make it notable. Thus far nobody opposed the fact that the magazine enjoys an international audience adding credibility to notability. Thus I ask again for example what would make it notable otherwise.
659:
I tried to clean up the layout of this AfD to make it readable by removing unnecessary templates and subsections, etc. If anything got put in the wrong place or in the wrong order, it wasn't intentional. @MickeyDangerez: Please don't tweak the formating anymore. This is not an article and does not
292:
I am sorry for giving the impression of promoting the publication, that is not my intention for creating this article. I still do not comprehend why the publication may not have credible indication of importance. Could you please elaborate on how you have come to this conclusion or what forms the
1313:: I have found the source. The Anti-Drug Alliance of South Africa created and distributed a pdf document. I cannot seem to find a copy online. I have contacted them to furnish me with a link. Please find the following mirror to a copy of the original PDF document as created by the organization.
709:
and recommendations, etc. are marked with bullet points and indicated in bold. I'm not sure what other categories you're referring to, but anything relevant to this AfD is best discussed here so that everything stays in one place. Detailed discussion can be posted on this AfD's talk page. --
1165:
535:
Please see my comment above, "notability requires that others are writing about the publication and this has been proven true" also note that there is no minimum number of sources required, reasoning also in comment above, please engage in the discussion section above.
978:: the Anti-Drug Alliance of South Africa publicly responded to an article about employee dagga rights in which they created a lengthy article focusing on the subject in terms of the notability guide. While I am looking for the original source. A mirror is available on
1505:: Nothing notable about this "magazine" (for want of a better word) that failed in its attempt to go into print. The fact that it failed in its Indigo campaign speaks volumes on the notability claims made by its only contributor and editor pushing for the keep here.
941:
more than a mention: The magazine was quoted by a reliable (accredited), independent(non affiliated) source. A clear distinction should be considered between a trivial mention and quote. As well as have been the subject of various local non affiliated pro-cannabis
1272:
reference: My argument is that quoting the words of another person cannot be consider a trivial mention. The reason is that they aren't merely referencing the magazine's name but they are actually talking about a statement that was made by the publication. The
1168:
471:: The content of this article is commendably frank about their Indiegogo campaign. However, neither that nor the primary sources in the article, nor the several mentions listed above provide the in-depth coverage in reliable sources that is required for
690:
In my opinion the previous formatting was highly readable especially where this page is re-displayed in other categories. I have no clue what is going on on the current formatting. references for notability are obscured and commentary and voting is now
293:
basis for you to believe that this article has no credible indication of importance? PS. There is conflict of interest. I am part of this organization. I will review the COI documentation. Please get back to me on credible indication of importance.--
874:
which is usually ignored in deletion discussions. Besides, this specific argument is comparing 'apples to oranges'. An equal argument would need to provide examples of poorly sourced magazines articles in a plea to keep.
1278:
given. The other very important reference is the one in which the Anti-Drug
Alliance of South Africa created a lengthy document about an article the publication wrote about employee dagga rights. Reference also above.
1567:, previously in this AfD it was suggested that you refrain from disputing every expression of opinion contrary to your own in this discussion. You should also refrain from personal allegations against participants:
171:
660:
need to be formatted as such with subsections, etc. and citations as references. Keep the formating as simple as possible to make it easier for others (particularly the closing admin) to follow as explained in
124:
450:
594:
It may not be an in-depth discussion of the publication but establishes that the magazine has an international audience and in conjunction with other sources makes it notable.--
1349:
1117:
Also, Mickey, it's not a good idea to add comments after everyone else's input. We are already aware that you disagree, and we don't need to be "corrected" or argued with.
274:
to boot, since the editor apparently wrote this article. I get the impression the only motivation of the author of the article is to publicize and/or promote the magazine (
165:
307:
It is not my intention to use
Knowledge (XXG) for the purpose of advertising, promoting the publication or to boost web-presence. Please see the publication's most
705:
AfDs are generally meant to be read from top to bottom. There's a certain flow to an AfD discussion, and posts are in most cases read in chronological order.
672:
or better yet make the improvements directly to the article itself and simply post a note here in the AfD as to what you did. Also, in general please follow
623:, I have restoring the nominator's rationale to the top of this discussion, where it belongs. Please do not relocate or refactor others' contributions here.
345::"The event, according to Dagga Magazine, a marijuana culture blog, was dubbed āone of the most historic moments in 4:20 history.ā (International: America)
131:
386:
270:, hence it was deleted earlier "A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events)". There's a
1268:
what would be the threshold & ratio it would take to meet the in-depth & persistent coverage requirement for notability. Regarding the
669:
1608:
1549:
1490:
1334:
772:
567:
428:
1391:
966:: Some of the rationales given for nominations have been based on the content of the article rather than the notability of the magazine.
1448:
1186:
97:
92:
17:
101:
1317:
979:
1436:
It wasn't a comment upon the length of the discussion, but rather the fact that it was less a discussion and more an exercise in
576:
The subject article does not inherit notability from a passing mention in a
Durango Herald article about another matter. To say
1517:
1288:
have said that the publication has zero notability, and if I had the privileges would delete the page myself. One <3 Love,--
986:
Therefore I conclude my plea to keep this article. Should the conclusion be to delete the article I ask that it be merged with
84:
186:
1314:
153:
1441:
1265:
1179:
1371:
871:
1237:
in one reply you mention that I haven't included any references but I have included the ones that are searchable online.
1637:
40:
1423:
378:
385:"The above chart, courtesy of David J. Nutt at Dagga magazine, illustrates the harm trends" (International: Canada)
374:
521:
during apartheid mainstream coverage is limited. I don't believe notability should only rely on Google searches.--
1535:
campaign held at the subject's birth. Clearly Rob you some vendetta against my person or against the subject. --
948:: The referenced sources are reliable, the most notable a newspaper and high profile pro-cannabis organizations.
147:
1602:
1543:
1486:
1328:
1293:
1065:
998:
920:
827:
768:
729:
696:
650:
599:
563:
541:
526:
424:
396:
324:
298:
250:
954:: Sources are secondary and not all of them are verifiable with a google search engine. Multiple references.
1395:
1107:
881:
1614:
1580:
1555:
1523:
1494:
1478:
1457:
1427:
1403:
1361:
1340:
1297:
1195:
1153:
1126:
1112:
1069:
1024:
1002:
924:
886:
850:
831:
793:
776:
760:
733:
719:
700:
685:
654:
632:
603:
589:
571:
545:
530:
492:
461:
432:
400:
328:
302:
287:
254:
218:
143:
66:
1419:
62:
665:
555:
472:
308:
207:
88:
1633:
36:
1437:
409:
the magazine received 49288 article views which attracted 1371 comments on 63 approved articles on the
193:
1474:
993:
I thank all participants for investing their personal time on this matter. Have a great day/evening--
1161:
476:
382:
370:
362:
350:
338:
316:
80:
72:
1596:
1564:
1537:
1512:
1482:
1322:
1289:
1061:
994:
916:
823:
764:
725:
715:
692:
681:
646:
620:
595:
559:
537:
522:
420:
392:
320:
294:
261:
246:
179:
1171:
1145:
1052:
Thank you for your participation, please take note article content does not determine notability.
1381:
1232:
1102:
876:
245:
I am unsure why this article is nominated for deletion? Could you please clarify your rational?--
1149:
1075:
1057:
706:
661:
275:
990:
in the section that chronologically detail the evolution of the dagga culture of South Africa.
987:
1591:
1357:
641:
My bad, I was just trying to organize this page as it is included elsewhere on wikipedia, see
455:
283:
214:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1632:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1090:
1053:
838:
Duly noted regarding the format changes. As far as coverage is concerned, I'll refer here to
480:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
847:
790:
159:
1568:
1175:
839:
673:
334:
271:
267:
203:
1576:
932:
The main principles of the notability guide with rational for notability of the magazine:
628:
585:
488:
1157:
349:,Thus establishing the magazine's presence on an international scale. 420sa writes about
1507:
1269:
711:
677:
551:
342:
312:
1251:
1122:
1020:
1470:
1353:
358:
279:
210:
118:
1531:: ^ Really? The notability of a subject has been determined by the failure of an
1098:
843:
786:
668:. If you want to list sources or get into indepth discusisons, feel free to use
366:
354:
1572:
624:
581:
484:
1532:
346:
1247:
1118:
1086:
1016:
554:
reference does not meet any of the listed reasons for exclusion as per
645:, hence why I created category headings to keep the page organized.--
578:"The event, according to Dagga Magazine, a marijuana culture blog..."
410:
1410:
In my opinion all this collapsing of discussions is making this Afd
960:: None of the sources are or have been affiliated with the magazine.
414:
1626:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1101:
You can't push forward one assertion without having the other.
1374:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
670:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion/Dagga
Magazine
676:
when posting on community discussions such as these. --
315:, an international & independent source, quotes the
114:
110:
106:
1015:- I can see no evidence of notability in the article.
178:
1082:; where is your source material? That is the lacking
1089:
is referring to. Please follow on and take note of:
976:
Newly rediscovered reliable & independent source
1414:not less difficult to read. Could I ask editors to
1380:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
192:
451:list of South Africa-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1640:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1350:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
964:Article content does not determine notability
8:
1348:Note: This debate has been included in the
580:is not substantial coverage about the blog.
483:and my own searches are not finding better.
449:Note: This debate has been included in the
337:is extremely important in this regard. This
1099:" Notability requires verifiable evidence".
365:(Local, South Africa: references pending).
1476:
1347:
1209:The following discussion has been closed.
1200:
1038:The following discussion has been closed.
1029:
900:The following discussion has been closed.
891:
807:The following discussion has been closed.
798:
758:
506:The following discussion has been closed.
497:
448:
231:The following discussion has been closed.
222:
757:not sure if my nomination means anything.
1167:and nothing at all in the literature
226:Extended content regarding processes
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1594:for Rob's undeclared COI. Regards--
1418:? This Afd is not especially long.
24:
54:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1473:and Fields of Green for All on
1615:13:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
1581:06:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
1556:11:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
1524:10:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
1495:14:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
1458:07:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
1428:15:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
1404:15:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
67:15:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
1469:: A comment by Myrtle of the
1362:01:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
1341:22:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
1298:18:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
1196:16:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
1148:search indicates a dearth of
1127:15:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
1113:15:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
1070:13:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
1025:12:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
1003:19:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
925:17:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
887:15:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
851:23:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
832:05:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
794:23:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
777:21:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
734:15:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
720:13:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
701:12:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
686:12:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
655:10:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
633:10:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
604:10:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
590:10:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
572:18:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
546:08:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
531:08:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
493:06:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
462:22:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
433:21:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
401:09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
329:08:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
303:21:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
288:21:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
255:21:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
219:21:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
1224:Please forgive my noobiness.
1074:SInce you are referring to
379:Cannabis Culture (Magazine)
1657:
724:Thank you for your help.--
1629:Please do not modify it.
1266:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
1212:Please do not modify it.
1041:Please do not modify it.
903:Please do not modify it.
810:Please do not modify it.
509:Please do not modify it.
234:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
333:Notability in terms of
1416:please stop doing this
373:(Local, South Africa:
353:(Local, South Africa)
268:insuficciently notable
1160:, with such marginal
550:Please note that the
939:Significant coverage
802:Extended commentary
272:conflict of interest
895:Further commentary
872:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
1174:and concomitantly
501:Extend commentary
405:In terms of local
343:American newspaper
311:mention where the
1592:Talk:Dagga Couple
1497:
1481:comment added by
1420:Shawn in Montreal
1406:
1364:
1307:
1306:
1204:Extended content
1138:
1137:
1097:), which states:
1009:
1008:
864:
863:
779:
763:comment added by
751:
750:
464:
446:
445:
341:was quoted in an
56:
1648:
1631:
1611:
1605:
1599:
1552:
1546:
1540:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1455:
1446:
1400:
1389:
1385:ĪĀ GuyĀ intoĀ Books
1379:
1377:
1375:
1337:
1331:
1325:
1275:Three Blind Mice
1255:a Google search.
1214:
1201:
1193:
1184:
1164:in news outlets
1158:reliable sources
1100:
1043:
1030:
905:
892:
812:
799:
511:
498:
460:
265:
236:
223:
197:
196:
182:
134:
122:
104:
52:
48:The result was
34:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1638:deletion review
1627:
1609:
1603:
1597:
1550:
1544:
1538:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1449:
1442:
1407:
1396:
1382:
1370:
1368:
1335:
1329:
1323:
1210:
1187:
1180:
1039:
901:
848:Schreit mich an
808:
791:Schreit mich an
507:
454:
259:
232:
139:
130:
95:
79:
76:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1654:
1652:
1643:
1642:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1584:
1583:
1565:MickeyDangerez
1559:
1558:
1526:
1499:
1498:
1483:MickeyDangerez
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1431:
1430:
1378:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1344:
1343:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1290:MickeyDangerez
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1270:Durango Herald
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1226:
1225:
1216:
1215:
1206:
1205:
1199:
1198:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1115:
1062:MickeyDangerez
1045:
1044:
1035:
1034:
1028:
1027:
1007:
1006:
995:MickeyDangerez
984:
983:
982:
981:
970:
969:
968:
967:
961:
955:
949:
943:
942:organizations.
930:
929:
928:
927:
917:MickeyDangerez
907:
906:
897:
896:
890:
889:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
824:MickeyDangerez
814:
813:
804:
803:
797:
796:
780:
765:MickeyDangerez
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
726:MickeyDangerez
693:MickeyDangerez
691:intertwined.--
647:MickeyDangerez
636:
635:
621:MickeyDangerez
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
596:MickeyDangerez
560:MickeyDangerez
552:Durango Herald
548:
538:MickeyDangerez
533:
523:MickeyDangerez
513:
512:
503:
502:
496:
495:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
421:MickeyDangerez
417:
403:
393:MickeyDangerez
389:
383:Dagga Magazine
371:Dagga Magazine
363:Dagga Magazine
351:Dagga Magazine
331:
321:MickeyDangerez
317:Dagga Magazine
313:Durango Herald
305:
295:MickeyDangerez
278:). HTH, HAND.
262:MickeyDangerez
247:MickeyDangerez
238:
237:
228:
227:
200:
199:
136:
81:Dagga Magazine
75:
73:Dagga Magazine
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1653:
1641:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1624:
1623:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1606:
1601:
1600:
1593:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1553:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1534:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1465:
1464:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1453:
1447:
1445:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1399:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1376:
1373:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1346:
1345:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1332:
1327:
1326:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1276:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1236:
1235:
1234:Fylbecatulous
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1191:
1185:
1183:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1104:Fylbecatulous
1096:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1004:
1000:
996:
991:
989:
980:
977:
974:
973:
972:
971:
965:
962:
959:
956:
953:
950:
947:
944:
940:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
926:
922:
918:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
904:
899:
898:
894:
893:
888:
885:
884:
880:
879:
878:Fylbecatulous
873:
869:
866:
865:
852:
849:
845:
841:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
811:
806:
805:
801:
800:
795:
792:
788:
784:
781:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
756:
753:
752:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:
721:
717:
713:
708:
704:
703:
702:
698:
694:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
638:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
614:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
547:
543:
539:
534:
532:
528:
524:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
505:
504:
500:
499:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
466:
465:
463:
459:
458:
452:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
402:
398:
394:
390:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:writes about
368:
364:
361:writes about
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
263:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
230:
229:
225:
224:
221:
220:
216:
212:
209:
205:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1628:
1625:
1607:
1595:
1548:
1536:
1528:
1506:
1502:
1477:āĀ Preceding
1471:Dagga Couple
1466:
1451:
1450:
1443:
1440:. Cheers, ā
1415:
1411:
1397:
1384:
1383:
1369:
1333:
1321:
1318:mirror (txt)
1315:mirror (pdf)
1310:
1274:
1233:
1221:
1211:
1189:
1188:
1181:
1156:coverage in
1141:
1108:
1103:
1094:
1083:
1079:
1040:
1012:
992:
985:
975:
963:
957:
951:
945:
938:
931:
902:
882:
877:
867:
809:
782:
759:āĀ Preceding
754:
666:WP:AFDFORMAT
642:
616:
577:
556:WP:CORPDEPTH
508:
473:WP:CORPDEPTH
468:
457:CAPTAIN RAJU
456:
447:
406:
359:Dagga Couple
233:
208:WP:CORPDEPTH
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
127:
59:JamesBWatson
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1438:bludgeoning
958:Independent
367:Dagga Party
166:free images
1467:Notability
1452:velut luna
1190:velut luna
1154:persistent
477:WP:PRODUCT
1634:talk page
1533:Indiegogo
1354:ā¢ Gene93k
1172:WP:SIGCOV
1146:WP:BEFORE
1095:guideline
1080:guideline
988:Daggafari
712:Marchjuly
678:Marchjuly
415:reference
413:platform.
387:Reference
381:mentions
375:reference
355:Reference
347:Reference
37:talk page
1636:or in a
1610:Dangerez
1551:Dangerez
1491:contribs
1479:unsigned
1372:Relisted
1336:Dangerez
1246:-My bad
1170:. Fails
1162:mentions
1150:in-depth
1084:evidence
1076:WP:CONTN
1058:WP:CONTN
946:Reliable
773:contribs
761:unsigned
662:WP:AFDEQ
568:contribs
429:contribs
411:MyNews24
407:audience
339:magazine
335:audience
276:WP:PROMO
125:View log
39:or in a
1529:Comment
1444:fortuna
1398:Message
1311:Comment
1222:Comment
1182:fortuna
1091:WP:NRVE
1054:WP:ARTN
952:Sources
643:notices
617:Comment
481:WP:NWEB
309:notable
280:Kleuske
211:Kleuske
172:WPĀ refs
160:scholar
98:protect
93:history
50:Delete.
1598:Mickey
1569:WP:AGF
1539:Mickey
1503:Delete
1324:Mickey
1176:WP:GNG
1142:Delete
1093:(same
1078:, the
1056:&
1033:Again
1013:Delete
868:Delete
844:BigHaz
840:WP:GNG
787:BigHaz
783:Delete
707:!Votes
674:WP:TPG
469:Delete
266:It is
204:WP:GNG
202:Fails
144:Google
102:delete
1573:AllyD
1402:)Ā -
625:AllyD
582:AllyD
485:AllyD
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
1577:talk
1487:talk
1424:talk
1412:more
1358:talk
1294:talk
1252:talk
1178:. ā
1123:talk
1109:talk
1066:talk
1021:talk
999:talk
921:talk
883:talk
828:talk
769:talk
755:Keep
730:talk
716:talk
697:talk
682:talk
664:and
651:talk
629:talk
600:talk
586:talk
564:talk
558:.--
542:talk
527:talk
489:talk
425:talk
397:talk
325:talk
299:talk
284:talk
251:talk
215:talk
180:FENS
154:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
63:talk
1519:vee
1514:van
1509:Rob
1248:Deb
1119:Deb
1087:Deb
1017:Deb
479:or
419:--
377:).
194:TWL
123:ā (
61:" (
1604:ā
1579:)
1571:.
1545:ā
1493:)
1489:ā¢
1426:)
1360:)
1352:.
1320:--
1296:)
1152:,
1144:A
1125:)
1068:)
1060:--
1023:)
1001:)
923:)
846:-
830:)
789:-
775:)
771:ā¢
732:)
718:)
699:)
684:)
653:)
631:)
619::
602:)
588:)
570:)
566:ā¢
544:)
536:--
529:)
491:)
475:,
453:.
431:)
427:ā¢
399:)
391:--
357:.
327:)
301:)
286:)
253:)
217:)
174:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
65:)
1575:(
1485:(
1422:(
1394:(
1392:Ā§
1388:ā¢
1356:(
1330:ā
1292:(
1264:-
1250:(
1231:-
1121:(
1064:(
1019:(
997:(
919:(
826:(
767:(
728:(
714:(
695:(
680:(
649:(
627:(
598:(
584:(
562:(
540:(
525:(
487:(
423:(
395:(
323:(
297:(
282:(
264::
260:@
249:(
213:(
206:/
198:)
190:Ā·
184:Ā·
176:Ā·
169:Ā·
163:Ā·
157:Ā·
151:Ā·
146:(
138:(
135:)
128:Ā·
121:)
83:(
57:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.