489:. With reasonably high-profile public figures like this, we need to be sure we're getting things absolutely right, and it's not clear that the translation here is doing that. However, I think it's almost certain that the subject is notable, so if the concern is accuracy, why not send it to draft? That way, we can keep what is reasonable to keep and get rid of the bad machine-translated bits. And if S Marshall's concern is a lack of AfC quality control, draftifying seems a fair solution.
561:
and 2) if not, draftifying to allow clean-up can occur. Also, where's the repeated recreation? Looking at the logs, it's only been re-created once, and there's also no evidence that one person has been repeatedly re-creating it against consensus. Of course, It's possible that I missed something, in which case I will reconsider my !vote. Best,
560:
to allow clean-up. If notability isn't in question, deletion shouldn't be happen (in the majority of cases; there are of course exceptions such as TNT and copyvio). I agree machine translations shouldn't remain untouched, but I 1) don't see convincing evidence that a good stuffification won't stick,
413:
Because dropping a raw machine translation into en.wiki takes seconds, but repairing a raw machine translation takes a long time to do right; and it's always easier to retranslate from scratch than to repair. That's why we have this longstanding rule that a raw machine translation is worse than a
455:
The article's been re-created as a raw machine translation a few times now, and I think it's on someone's bucket list of
Articles Knowledge Should Have. I'm trying to force the next version to go through AFC for quality control, as I'm sure any stubbification would be
219:
538:
there are reliable sources available and some already exist in the article but the major concern here is the translation. I will like to fix it but I'm handicapped here because I do not understand French.
311:
172:
213:
331:
285:
351:
119:
104:
179:
145:
140:
149:
132:
234:
395:
as has reliable sources coverage. The nominator has a good standard of French according to his userbox so why not just fix it, imv
201:
467:
425:
299:
273:
258:. Please will the community authorise the article's deletion? You should consider that this lady may well be notable, and that
99:
92:
17:
568:
494:
446:
359:
259:
255:
195:
63:
574:
548:
528:
498:
471:
450:
429:
404:
387:
363:
343:
323:
303:
277:
113:
109:
74:
544:
507:
191:
591:
40:
241:
490:
442:
355:
136:
587:
540:
400:
36:
463:
421:
383:
295:
269:
207:
339:
319:
250:
On reviewing this article, I note that the text is a lightly-obfuscated raw machine translation of
227:
128:
80:
88:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
586:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
441:. If there are concerns about machine translation, why not just stubbify as an ATD instead?
396:
375:
59:
251:
457:
415:
379:
289:
263:
519:
335:
315:
54:
562:
486:
166:
68:
52:. Also stubbed. Should not be re-expanded except with human-written content.
254:. Knowledge's longstanding view on machine translations is set out at
582:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
510:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
312:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
162:
158:
154:
226:
516:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
594:). No further edits should be made to this page.
350:Note: This discussion has been included in the
330:Note: This discussion has been included in the
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
240:
8:
120:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
332:list of France-related deletion discussions
286:list of People-related deletion discussions
352:list of Women-related deletion discussions
349:
329:
309:
283:
252:the French-language version of the article
378:(including some already in the article).
262:applies despite her likely notability. —
7:
556:but stubbify or (as an alternative)
24:
105:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
575:12:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
549:13:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
529:09:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
499:21:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
472:19:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
451:17:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
430:06:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
405:21:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
388:18:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
364:14:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
344:12:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
324:12:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
304:12:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
278:12:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
75:18:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
95:(AfD)? Read these primers!
611:
584:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
260:WP:MACHINETRANSLATION
256:WP:MACHINETRANSLATION
93:Articles for deletion
485:to my userspace per
55:(non-admin closure)
491:AleatoryPonderings
481:or (failing that)
443:AleatoryPonderings
356:AleatoryPonderings
573:
531:
527:
470:
428:
366:
346:
326:
306:
302:
276:
110:Guide to deletion
100:How to contribute
57:
602:
565:
541:Northern Escapee
526:
524:
517:
515:
513:
511:
462:
439:Comment/question
420:
374:reliable French
294:
268:
245:
244:
230:
182:
170:
152:
90:
71:
53:
34:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
598:
592:deletion review
571:
532:
520:
518:
506:
504:
187:
178:
143:
127:
124:
87:
84:
69:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
597:
596:
578:
577:
567:
551:
514:
503:
502:
501:
476:
475:
474:
435:
434:
433:
432:
408:
407:
390:
368:
367:
347:
327:
307:
248:
247:
184:
123:
122:
117:
107:
102:
85:
83:
78:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
595:
593:
589:
585:
580:
579:
576:
572:
570:
564:
559:
555:
552:
550:
546:
542:
537:
534:
533:
530:
525:
523:
512:
509:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
412:
411:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:sources exist
373:
370:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
345:
341:
337:
333:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
261:
257:
253:
243:
239:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
193:
190:
189:Find sources:
185:
181:
177:
174:
168:
164:
160:
156:
151:
147:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:
121:
118:
115:
111:
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
94:
89:
82:
79:
77:
76:
73:
72:
65:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
583:
581:
566:
557:
553:
535:
521:
505:
482:
478:
458:
438:
416:
392:
371:
290:
264:
249:
237:
231:
223:
216:
210:
204:
198:
188:
175:
129:Daphné Bürki
86:
81:Daphné Bürki
67:
49:
47:
31:
28:
397:Atlantic306
214:free images
522:Sandstein
459:S Marshall
456:reverted.—
417:S Marshall
380:Trillfendi
291:S Marshall
265:S Marshall
588:talk page
414:redlink.—
336:Shellwood
316:Shellwood
37:talk page
590:or in a
563:Eddie891
558:Draftify
508:Relisted
479:Draftify
173:View log
114:glossary
39:or in a
220:WP refs
208:scholar
146:protect
141:history
91:New to
487:WP:BLP
483:userfy
192:Google
150:delete
70:buidhe
235:JSTOR
196:books
180:Stats
167:views
159:watch
155:links
16:<
569:Work
554:Keep
545:talk
536:Keep
495:talk
447:talk
401:talk
393:Keep
384:talk
372:Keep
360:talk
340:talk
320:talk
228:FENS
202:news
163:logs
137:talk
133:edit
50:keep
288:. —
242:TWL
171:– (
547:)
497:)
449:)
403:)
386:)
362:)
354:.
342:)
334:.
322:)
314:.
222:)
165:|
161:|
157:|
153:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
66:)
62:·
543:(
493:(
468:C
466:/
464:T
445:(
426:C
424:/
422:T
399:(
382:(
358:(
338:(
318:(
300:C
298:/
296:T
274:C
272:/
270:T
246:)
238:·
232:·
224:·
217:·
211:·
205:·
199:·
194:(
186:(
183:)
176:·
169:)
131:(
116:)
112:(
64:c
60:t
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.