251:
The paper that introduced the technique has over 4,000 GS citations. That's a clear sign of notability for any academic contribution. And GS finds over a thousand publications containing the exact phrase "detrended correspondence analysis" just since the beginning of 2017
170:
355:
that this is a notable subject in ecology. It's hard to write articles about statistical techniques that are totally accessible to a lay audience, but the fact that you don't understand an article isn't a good reason to delete it.
305:
285:
264:
164:
410:
The heck. When did "I don't understand this topic" become a reason to nominate for deletion? Widely used method, good if not great sourcing (in direct contrast to the OP's statement). --
123:
96:
91:
273:
100:
83:
293:
130:
234:
GScholar's very first hits on the phrase are a series of paper discussing the merits of the technique. I must confess I find the explanation opaque, however.
253:
352:
185:
87:
152:
17:
427:
402:
367:
342:
325:
243:
224:
208:
79:
71:
65:
146:
388:
142:
422:
192:
217:
Could the nom please clarify what is meant by "no sourcing found"? There are several items in the
References section. –
446:
40:
158:
321:
442:
301:
281:
260:
36:
338:
394:
221:
178:
376:
61:
418:
362:
317:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
297:
277:
256:
239:
334:
381:
218:
316:
The term has been in use, and appearing in the relevant literature, for forty years.
57:
412:
357:
117:
235:
201:
Incoherent mess of buzzwords, no sourcing found. Prod declined without comment.
435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
109:
105:
177:
191:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
274:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
272:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
294:list of Science-related deletion discussions
291:
271:
333:. Plenty of sourcing, clearly important.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
80:Detrended correspondence analysis
72:Detrended correspondence analysis
1:
428:08:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
403:01:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
368:23:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
343:22:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
326:22:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
306:22:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
286:22:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
265:22:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
244:21:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
225:21:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
209:20:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
66:18:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
379:would have prevented this.
466:
375:. Easily notable. A quick
438:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
426:
400:
366:
308:
288:
457:
440:
416:
415:
397:
391:
386:
384:
360:
353:patently obvious
206:
204:Ten Pound Hammer
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
436:
411:
395:
389:
382:
202:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
431:
430:
405:
370:
346:
328:
310:
309:
289:
268:
267:
246:
228:
227:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
444:
439:
433:
432:
429:
424:
420:
414:
409:
406:
404:
401:
398:
392:
385:
378:
374:
371:
369:
364:
359:
354:
350:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
229:
226:
223:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
205:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
437:
434:
407:
380:
372:
348:
330:
318:Andy Dingley
313:
248:
231:
214:
203:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
165:free images
335:Xxanthippe
298:XOR'easter
278:XOR'easter
257:XOR'easter
443:talk page
383:Anarchyte
377:WP:BEFORE
373:Snow keep
219:dlthewave
37:talk page
445:or in a
423:contribs
124:View log
62:Edgar181
39:or in a
413:Elmidae
351:. It's
215:Comment
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
54:WP:SNOW
236:Mangoe
143:Google
101:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
419:talk
408:Keep
396:talk
390:work
363:talk
349:Keep
339:talk
331:Keep
322:talk
314:Keep
302:talk
282:talk
261:talk
249:Keep
240:talk
232:keep
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
50:keep
358:Joe
207:•
193:TWL
122:– (
56:--
421:·
393:|
356:–
341:)
324:)
304:)
296:.
284:)
276:.
263:)
255:.
242:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
58:Ed
52:.
425:)
417:(
399:)
387:(
365:)
361:(
345:.
337:(
320:(
300:(
280:(
259:(
238:(
222:☎
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.