399:
340:
This treads towards OTHERSTUFF but, seriously, have you seen the number of minor Indian film award articles that are just unsourced lists? This article doesn't pretend to be more than it is, that shouldn't be a reason to delete coverage of legitimate awards before cleaning up the articles on every
334:
the subject (awards) had been mentioned/included on lots of film, actor, and list of award articles - that is, the general advice is to not include awards in lists if they do not have a
Knowledge (XXG) article unless there is good third party coverage, and the forming consensus seemed to be that
337:
The nom mentions AwardsWatch and NBP by saying they give indiscriminate coverage, which isn't exactly true, but besides, I don't think they say things along the line of "these awards have been minor but will prove more influential on the season" about everything. The specific coverage should be
355:
I think the award was included in lots of lists because inexperienced editors just copy all of the awards from IMDb (which is an indiscriminate and unreliable source) and make a list, not because the awards are deemed to be significant. The same thing happens with awards from, for example,
380:
to provide secondary coverage. Regarding the unsourced Indian film awards, I'm sure there are issues there, and I would be more than happy to move for their deletion if there are similar issues, but those aren't relevant to this discussion, in my opinion.
222:
361:
335:
these awards do have the right level of notability even without an article. As the third edition then had an actual presentation, not just online, I thought the article was a reasonable creation.
216:
179:
152:
147:
156:
310:
376:
article is copied from the org's website – so I don't think that's reasonable analysis of the organization. If anything, it casts further doubt on the ability of
139:
290:
111:
126:
237:
413:. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be
204:
365:
143:
262:
106:
99:
17:
534:
509:
478:
447:
390:
350:
322:
302:
282:
198:
81:
120:
116:
194:
135:
87:
489:
456:
551:
328:
Just going to leave a comment as article creator, as I don't think the nom comment gives the full picture (obviously?).
40:
183:
244:
261:, which cover film awards indiscriminately and therefore do not appear to constitute significant coverage (see also
472:
525:
the awards or the organization, just lists of winners and nominees, which do not constitute significant coverage.
386:
318:
298:
278:
416:
210:
61:
547:
467:
36:
410:
53:
382:
314:
294:
274:
230:
364:), they are often added to awards lists by editors. And the note that these specific awards will "
504:
369:
346:
95:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
546:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
530:
443:
398:
409:: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for
499:
342:
173:
526:
439:
357:
341:
production company in
Bollywood giving themselves meaningless awards. Imho.
72:
542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
492:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
459:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
360:; even though those awards are not considered notable (see
56:, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired
169:
165:
161:
66:
265:). No other secondary coverage from reliable sources (
229:
498:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
465:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
243:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
554:). No further edits should be made to this page.
309:Note: This discussion has been included in the
289:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
127:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
311:list of Awards-related deletion discussions
308:
288:
291:list of Film-related deletion discussions
372:– in fact, that entire paragraph in the
370:straight from the organization's website
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
521:. Can't find any independent source
24:
420:at the end of its 7-day listing.
407:Note to closer for soft deletion
397:
112:Introduction to deletion process
67:request the article's undeletion
1:
136:DiscussingFilm Critics Awards
88:DiscussingFilm Critics Awards
102:(AfD)? Read these primers!
571:
366:make an even deeper impact
253:The current article cites
82:07:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
544:Please do not modify it.
535:23:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
510:10:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
479:02:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
448:00:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
391:18:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
351:16:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
323:16:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
303:16:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
283:16:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
273:, etc.) has been found.
32:Please do not modify it.
330:I made this as a stub
184:edits since nomination
100:Articles for deletion
54:minimal participation
512:
481:
325:
305:
259:Next Best Picture
117:Guide to deletion
107:How to contribute
562:
507:
502:
497:
495:
493:
477:
475:
470:
464:
462:
460:
435:
433:
401:
248:
247:
233:
177:
159:
97:
80:
69:
34:
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
561:
560:
559:
558:
552:deletion review
505:
500:
488:
486:
473:
468:
466:
455:
453:
431:
429:
383:RunningTiger123
315:RunningTiger123
295:RunningTiger123
275:RunningTiger123
263:this discussion
190:
150:
134:
131:
94:
91:
71:
65:
64:). Editors can
62:"soft deletion"
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
568:
566:
557:
556:
538:
537:
515:
514:
496:
483:
463:
450:
436:
422:
421:
411:lack of quorum
395:
394:
393:
339:
336:
329:
326:
306:
251:
250:
187:
130:
129:
124:
114:
109:
92:
90:
85:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
567:
555:
553:
549:
545:
540:
539:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
517:
516:
513:
511:
508:
503:
494:
491:
484:
482:
480:
476:
471:
461:
458:
451:
449:
445:
441:
437:
427:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:soft deletion
415:eligible for
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:this 2020 AfD
359:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
333:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
307:
304:
300:
296:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
246:
242:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
196:
193:
192:Find sources:
188:
185:
181:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
154:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
104:
103:
101:
96:
89:
86:
84:
83:
79:
77:
76:
68:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
543:
541:
522:
518:
487:
485:
454:
452:
425:
414:
406:
402:
377:
373:
368:" is copied
331:
270:
266:
258:
254:
252:
240:
234:
226:
219:
213:
207:
201:
191:
93:
74:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
474:Mississippi
338:considered.
255:AwardsWatch
217:free images
52:. Based on
50:soft delete
358:Gold Derby
548:talk page
37:talk page
550:or in a
490:Relisted
457:Relisted
430:2022-04
180:View log
121:glossary
60:(a.k.a.
39:or in a
343:Kingsif
267:Variety
223:WP refs
211:scholar
153:protect
148:history
98:New to
527:Nardog
519:Delete
506:plicit
440:Cewbot
434:create
195:Google
157:delete
523:about
332:after
238:JSTOR
199:books
174:views
166:watch
162:links
16:<
531:talk
469:Star
444:talk
426:Logs
403:Info
387:talk
347:talk
319:talk
299:talk
279:talk
257:and
231:FENS
205:news
170:logs
144:talk
140:edit
58:PROD
378:NBP
374:NBP
271:THR
245:TWL
178:– (
533:)
446:)
438:--
432:✍️
428::
405:-
389:)
349:)
321:)
313:.
301:)
293:.
281:)
269:,
225:)
182:|
172:|
168:|
164:|
160:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
78:iz
70:.
529:(
501:✗
442:(
385:(
345:(
317:(
297:(
277:(
249:)
241:·
235:·
227:·
220:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
197:(
189:(
186:)
176:)
138:(
123:)
119:(
75:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.