Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Drunknmunky - Knowledge

Source 📝

403:
Drunknmunky is definitely a real brand, as I have some of their clothes. I'm actually surprised by the lack of coverage that they get as they were quite trendy for about one or two years. They used to be sold in
198: 422:, I was referring to the website that was on the page at the time of my comment.... and basing it purely off that and me trying to determine the image on the page copyright status. 284: 267: 159: 301: 192: 318: 106: 91: 239:
Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements
132: 127: 86: 79: 17: 136: 213: 351: 180: 119: 100: 96: 469: 40: 342:
did not show any results except routine pr-announcements and hip hop marketing material which does not satisfy
174: 347: 370: 241:. Sources cited in the article do not provide the level of analysis required for this company and a quick 465: 170: 36: 446: 431: 414: 394: 374: 355: 327: 310: 293: 276: 259: 61: 123: 405: 343: 234: 220: 206: 115: 67: 365: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
464:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
339: 242: 57: 426: 389: 230: 186: 441: 419: 409: 383: 382:: per A7, the website for the "company" also has no content, so I think its a possible 322: 305: 288: 271: 254: 250: 246: 153: 53: 423: 386: 253:
involvement as well as 'random IPs' are continually removing deletion tags.
233:. My particular concern is that there is no coverage that satisfies 229:
A poorly sourced article on a company that does not appear to pass
363:— per G11, for using Knowledge for blatant promotional purposes. 460:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
440:
Fair enough. That 'own work' tag is certainly dubious at best.
149: 145: 141: 205: 408:. Still not notable enough for an article, though. 285:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 472:). No further edits should be made to this page. 317:Note: This discussion has been included in the 300:Note: This discussion has been included in the 283:Note: This discussion has been included in the 266:Note: This discussion has been included in the 268:list of California-related deletion discussions 302:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 219: 8: 319:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 316: 299: 282: 265: 7: 245:search yields little better. Clear 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 489: 447:09:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC) 432:02:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC) 415:23:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 395:23:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 375:23:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 356:23:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 328:23:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 311:23:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 294:23:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 277:23:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 260:23:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 62:23:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC) 462:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 80:Articles for deletion 348:CommanderWaterford 330: 313: 296: 279: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 480: 444: 412: 325: 308: 291: 274: 257: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 488: 487: 483: 482: 481: 479: 478: 477: 476: 470:deletion review 442: 429: 410: 392: 323: 306: 289: 272: 255: 237:, which states 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 486: 484: 475: 474: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 435: 434: 427: 398: 397: 390: 377: 358: 332: 331: 314: 297: 280: 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 485: 473: 471: 467: 463: 458: 457: 448: 445: 439: 438: 437: 436: 433: 430: 425: 421: 418: 417: 416: 413: 407: 402: 401: 400: 399: 396: 393: 388: 385: 381: 380:Speedy delete 378: 376: 372: 368: 367: 362: 361:Speedy Delete 359: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 334: 333: 329: 326: 320: 315: 312: 309: 303: 298: 295: 292: 286: 281: 278: 275: 269: 264: 263: 262: 261: 258: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 461: 459: 379: 366:Celestina007 364: 360: 344:WP:CORPDEPTH 338:per nom. My 335: 238: 235:WP:CORPDEPTH 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 193:free images 116:Drunknmunky 68:Drunknmunky 466:talk page 443:Spiderone 420:Spiderone 411:Spiderone 340:WP:BEFORE 324:Spiderone 307:Spiderone 290:Spiderone 273:Spiderone 256:Spiderone 243:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 468:or in a 406:Republic 346:at all. 231:WP:NCORP 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 384:WP:HOAX 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 336:Delete 251:WP:UPE 247:WP:COI 171:Google 137:delete 54:Daniel 50:delete 424:Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ 387:Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 428:Talk 391:Talk 371:talk 352:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 221:TWL 158:– ( 373:) 354:) 321:. 304:. 287:. 270:. 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 369:( 350:( 249:/ 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Daniel
talk
23:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Drunknmunky

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Drunknmunky
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.