531:, so it isn't independent. All the other sources apart from the newsletter of Pereira's chamber of commerce are literally no more than one-line passing mentions. I have read everything carefully as you said, and I am not disputing the figures about the number of outlets or annual sales... my point is that I have been looking at this article for a month, and I still can't see any detailed information that doesn't come from the company itself. I don't believe that your comparison with Pfizer or Walmart is valid, because there are literally hundreds or thousands of independent articles about them in newspapers and magazines all over the world, that have not been written by the company.
228:. Mostly the work of two editors who appear to have a close connection with the subject, adding information that can't be found in any of the sources. The organization had a few drugstores, but their principal business was as a distribution company behind the scenes, and I don't believe that there is enough significant independent coverage to demonstrate notability. Most of the history of the company is sourced to this article in
356:
and awards recognition to significant businesess. It doesnt do that for anyone. The company infact doesnt exist anymore and is an important part of the history of the farmaceutical industry of the company. A few dates and details may be off but that can be fixed. There is more sources in print but as far as i can tell wikipedia only takes online sources.
320:, and it appears to have been a significant organisation. As it is closed there are no issues about this being promotional. Not surprising that when a newspaper runs an article about a company the company takes adverts in the paper. Nor is it surprising that the local chamber of commerce is a substantial source.
470:
Given time and a consensus on this article will provide a basis to over some years to add more and more references and mapping the evolution of the farmaceutical company duting the second half of the 20th century. Its comparable to wikipedia editors suddenly saying for example that merck or pfizer or
456:
The article from portafolio clearly refetences the original source in the chilean newspaper. And does provide several quotations. They are just not using the "" symbols. Please read all the sources mpre carefully you will see that the scope of the company was large. Covering from its own 250 to 275
355:
Hi. I dont believe the article in el tiempo was a paid for ad. It was spurced from a chilean newspaper who called and interviewed the founder of dromayor. The colombian papers got it from a chilean newspaper. Although the original source was taken down. Also the chamber of commerce has a newletter
644:
two completely separate articles dear richard. Mr Villa has also notable work in the real estate and licour industries. also founding several organizations and being on the Board of directors of fenalco, the largest NGO for bussiness in colombia. Best
Regards. and im sure you meant that when this
241:. Sure enough, they all contain the phrases "nuestro fundador" ("our founder"), "nuestros clientes" ("our clients"), "nuestro personal" ("our personnel")... so these are nothing more than a series of paid-for advertisements taken out by the company itself, and therefore not independent. The other
433:
which means it's not independent. Secondly, there isn't a single quotation in the whole article, which would be very unusual for an interview. However, print sources are completely acceptable on
Knowledge, providing that the sources are reliable and that you source them properly (title, name of
258:
source only mention the company in passing regarding its sell-off in 2014. Most of the detailed information comes from the newsletter of the founder's local chamber of commerce, which apart from not being a reliable source, is simply doing its job in promoting local business and businessmen. In
504:"it is very important to note that the article does not say "our founder" – sorry, but that's not true... that's EXACTLY what it says in the second paragraph: "La vida de nuestro fundador...". So even if this was paraphrased from a Chilean newspaper, this wasn't written by journalists at
571:
You may be right about one article wich is similar to another one being a press release regarding the "our" this and "our" that concern but theres 12 other sources. The article in the chamber of commerce magazine is defenetely an independent substantial source. And i added others also.
550:
Just added more sources. University thesis from two separate universities on dromayor. Also the article of the founder is in a draft to be moved to main space. Please feel free to edit facts or numbers that may be off. Or dates as well. So that a concensus can be reached. Best regards.
534:
Saying "keep the article and let other editors add sources over time" is not a valid basis for keeping the article... the reliable independent sources need to be there in the first place, we don't keep articles on the basis that they can eventually become notable.
52:. Even without bolded opinions, the source analysis is compelling. Considered putting into draft but the editor working on it (who I suspect has a COI) appears to be determined that we will retain our content and this came out of draft before it was ready earlier.
249:
sources, down to the title, and is obviously a press release from the company regarding a potential 2008 takeover which never happened (and the statement in the article that it was due to the economic crisis is not corroborated by any of the sources). The other
460:
Please read carefully and you will se the stpry emerges that dromayor was a large referanceable conglomerate. Also operating licour distribution. Also having a stake in a soccet team. And also contributing to large construction projects.
645:
articles discussion is closed then you can move on to other subjects you have more knowledge on. also more sources comming, right now the libraries are closed due to covid but already gatthering printed sources to list.
193:
428:
I don't believe this is an interview with the founder - firstly, he wouldn't refer to himself as "our founder", which the article does, and even if it is an interview, that's also a problem because it's a
725:
which I redirected as there was no references worth looking at, for a BLP. I think as a public pharma employing 4000 folk it should be notable, but unfortunately the references are very poor, and they
629:, is essentially just a duplication of this article, and if this article survives, I think they should be merged – Mr Villa Osorio really has no notability outside of founding this company.
296:
259:
short, the only detail in the article comes from the company itself or the local chamber of commerce, and there is nothing more than passing mentions in independent sources.
154:
673:
Thanks for the patronising comment, but I'm not convinced at all about the separate notability, I'm afraid. I'll wait and see what you are able to add from print sources.
276:
187:
450:
Hi
Richard. The interview was paraphrased into an article. It was more of a fact check call as i have investigated. I will add print sources. Best regards.
101:
86:
453:
Also it is very important to note that the article does not say "our founder" you are probably reading a raw translation as the source is in spanish.
763:, the editor reverted your redirect... they also decided to unilaterally remove the AfD tags on the article and close the discussion themselves.
527:
must be press releases issued by
Dromayor because they are identical, and they also say that the company's founder gave the information to
338:
The newspaper didn't run an article about the company though - there are only the adverts that the company placed, and nothing else.
660:
587:
566:
486:
409:
391:
371:
413:
721:
It should be notable, but an examination of the references are very poor. There is two references of the eight should be in the
457:
drugstores at any given time. Not few. To a wide network of independent farmacies, between 10,000 to 20,000 at any given time.
81:
74:
17:
127:
122:
208:
131:
95:
91:
175:
693:
600:
525:
235:, but I became suspicious when I found two other articles on the company in the same newspaper from the same date
789:
467:
The sources in print are even more ample as i have researched but kept the article tp what was available online.
114:
40:
738:
722:
626:
169:
785:
768:
678:
656:
634:
611:
583:
562:
540:
482:
439:
405:
387:
367:
343:
304:
284:
264:
36:
511:
My point is that almost all the information in the article has been provided by
Dromayor itself – the
648:
575:
554:
474:
379:
359:
325:
165:
772:
751:
711:
682:
664:
638:
615:
591:
544:
490:
443:
395:
347:
329:
308:
288:
268:
201:
118:
56:
215:
730:
430:
225:
110:
70:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
784:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
764:
760:
744:
674:
652:
630:
579:
558:
536:
499:
478:
435:
423:
401:
383:
363:
339:
300:
280:
260:
321:
519:
239:
236:
233:
726:
181:
708:
53:
148:
508:, it was written by Dromayor and they paid to have it published in the newspaper.
625:: I have to say that the article you have now created for the firm's founder,
780:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
696:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
603:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
434:
source, date, and author and page number if possible).
316:
There appear to be plenty of references, only two from
144:
140:
136:
515:
article was written by
Dromayor, the other article in
200:
707:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
609:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
297:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
792:). No further edits should be made to this page.
295:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
737:. I think there is sufficient coverage for the
277:list of Colombia-related deletion discussions
245:source is identical in wording to one of the
214:
8:
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
646:
573:
552:
472:
377:
357:
294:
274:
7:
471:wallgreens are not referenceable.
24:
374:) 14:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
87:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
545:17:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
491:16:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
444:14:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
396:14:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
348:13:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
330:11:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
309:21:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
289:21:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
269:21:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
569:) 23:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
773:01:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
752:10:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
712:15:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
683:21:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
665:20:46, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
639:20:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
57:07:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
616:14:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
592:23:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
809:
741:article to be restored.
782:Please do not modify it.
759:: as you probably noted
32:Please do not modify it.
414:few or no other edits
75:Articles for deletion
521:and this article in
416:outside this topic.
739:HĂ©ctor Villa Osorio
723:HĂ©ctor Villa Osorio
627:HĂ©ctor Villa Osorio
702:Relisting comment:
714:
667:
651:comment added by
618:
594:
578:comment added by
570:
557:comment added by
493:
477:comment added by
417:
398:
382:comment added by
375:
362:comment added by
311:
291:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
800:
749:
747:
706:
704:Needs more input
699:
697:
614:
608:
606:
604:
503:
427:
399:
254:sources and the
219:
218:
204:
152:
134:
72:
34:
808:
807:
803:
802:
801:
799:
798:
797:
796:
790:deletion review
745:
743:
733:. It should be
715:
692:
690:
619:
610:
599:
597:
497:
421:
161:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
806:
804:
795:
794:
776:
775:
754:
705:
700:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
642:
641:
607:
596:
548:
547:
532:
509:
448:
447:
431:primary source
353:
352:
351:
350:
333:
332:
313:
312:
292:
222:
221:
158:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
805:
793:
791:
787:
783:
778:
777:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
717:
716:
713:
710:
703:
698:
695:
684:
680:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
621:
620:
617:
613:
612:North America
605:
602:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
568:
564:
560:
556:
546:
542:
538:
533:
530:
526:
524:
520:
518:
514:
510:
507:
501:
496:
495:
494:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
468:
465:
464:Best regards
462:
458:
454:
451:
445:
441:
437:
432:
425:
420:
419:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
373:
369:
365:
361:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
335:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
253:
248:
244:
240:
237:
234:
231:
227:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
781:
779:
756:
742:
734:
718:
701:
691:
647:— Preceding
643:
622:
598:
574:— Preceding
553:— Preceding
549:
528:
522:
516:
512:
505:
473:— Preceding
469:
466:
463:
459:
455:
452:
449:
378:— Preceding
358:— Preceding
354:
317:
255:
251:
246:
242:
229:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
765:Richard3120
761:scope_creep
746:scope_creep
675:Richard3120
653:Editelefant
631:Richard3120
580:Editelefant
559:Editelefant
537:Richard3120
500:Editelefant
479:Editelefant
436:Richard3120
424:Editelefant
412:) has made
402:Editelefant
384:Editelefant
364:Editelefant
340:Richard3120
301:Richard3120
281:Richard3120
261:Richard3120
188:free images
735:draftified
731:WP:ORGCRIT
529:Estrategia
376:Country*
322:Rathfelder
232:newspaper
226:WP:ORGCRIT
786:talk page
523:Portfolio
517:El Tiempo
513:El Tiempo
506:El Tiempo
318:El Tiempo
252:Portfolio
247:Portfolio
243:El Tiempo
230:El Tiempo
37:talk page
788:or in a
694:Relisted
661:contribs
649:unsigned
601:Relisted
588:contribs
576:unsigned
567:contribs
555:unsigned
487:contribs
475:unsigned
410:contribs
392:contribs
380:unsigned
372:contribs
360:unsigned
155:View log
111:Dromayor
96:glossary
63:Dromayor
39:or in a
757:Comment
727:WP:SIRS
719:Comment
709:Spartaz
623:Comment
194:WPÂ refs
182:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
256:Dinero
224:Fails
166:Google
132:delete
50:delete
209:JSTOR
170:books
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
769:talk
729:and
679:talk
657:talk
635:talk
584:talk
563:talk
541:talk
483:talk
440:talk
406:talk
388:talk
368:talk
344:talk
326:talk
305:talk
285:talk
265:talk
238:and
202:FENS
176:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
216:TWL
153:– (
771:)
681:)
663:)
659:•
637:)
590:)
586:•
565:•
543:)
489:)
485:•
442:)
408:•
400:—
394:)
390:•
370:•
346:)
328:)
307:)
299:.
287:)
279:.
267:)
196:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
767:(
677:(
655:(
633:(
582:(
561:(
539:(
502::
498:@
481:(
446:.
438:(
426::
422:@
404:(
386:(
366:(
342:(
324:(
303:(
283:(
263:(
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.