473:
of the council." That is, at level best, a dicdef, and it certainly doesn't support the statement to which you tagged it. It likewise does not meet the GNG, nor any notability criteria extant on
Knowledge (XXG). If you're going to lecture us on the "merits," kindly do us the honor of doing so with genuine qualifying information, rather than hoping we're not paying attention.
472:
the source, or just linked the first hit you found for "duo-raaslid?" The part of the link you posted referring to the subject is "- duoraadslid: een raadscommissielid, niet zijnde een lid van de raad" or, roughly translated, "dual member of the council: a member of the council, other than a member
521:
Word of advice: always question yourself before you question others. You seem to read Dutch through autotranslator. This can easily lead to wrong conclusions. To the discussion closer: there is another valid reference that you can find in the edit history that was twice "removed". I'm not going to
253:
It exists, it has mentions (only really in Dutch) and a Dutch article on WP. However, I'm not convinced it meets the threshold for notability needed for a stand-alone article. It is essentially a definition, as are the other sources I could find. There are
222:
551:
I agree that there's nothing sourced to merge. That being said, the concept's already discussed as far as it's noteworthy in the
Municipal council article, and a redirect would not be inappropriate
488:
Not kidding. It supports exactly the text it references. As the intro correctly states "It exists, it has mentions (only really in Dutch) and a Dutch article on WP." We should merge it.
307:
175:
283:
506:
sentence that cite allegedly supported was "The Duo-Raadslid is a representative of a political party who is not elected into a city council." I have removed it again.
216:
107:
122:
62:
454:
below me. It's easy to add more. When information is correct, it should be disucssed on its merits for WP, not on possibly missing references.
182:
263:
102:
95:
17:
148:
143:
412:
331:
152:
53:
116:
112:
237:
135:
69:
570:
433:
my only concern about a merge rather than just a redirect, is that all the info in this article is completely unsourced.
379:
347:
204:
611:
40:
292:
198:
194:
607:
594:
561:
531:
516:
497:
483:
463:
442:
424:
402:
370:
338:
319:
299:
275:
77:
36:
552:
507:
474:
244:
589:
287:
230:
259:
139:
91:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
606:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
527:
493:
459:
438:
420:
271:
255:
451:
314:
210:
580:
502:
Then I don't know what to say that would be within the bounds of WP:CIVIL, since the
335:
131:
83:
169:
523:
489:
455:
447:
434:
416:
389:
357:
267:
311:
415:. Regardless of notability, as a matter of good information stewardship.
266:. There is also the less-good option of a soft redirect to Wiktionary.
450:, I have added a first reference, undermining your point and that of
602:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
573:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
382:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
350:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
258:: a possible merge/redirect or just redirect to either
165:
161:
157:
229:
579:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
522:edit war over someone's misunderstanding of Dutch.
388:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
356:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
243:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
614:). No further edits should be made to this page.
308:list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions
306:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
123:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
305:
281:
468:You're kidding, right? Did you actually
264:Municipal politics in the Netherlands
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
108:Introduction to deletion process
413:Municipal council (Netherlands)
332:Municipal council (Netherlands)
54:Municipal council (Netherlands)
1:
98:(AfD)? Read these primers!
631:
78:16:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
595:09:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
562:09:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
532:15:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
517:06:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
498:20:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
484:15:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
464:14:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
443:08:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
425:22:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
403:05:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
371:04:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
604:Please do not modify it.
339:19:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
320:14:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
300:13:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
276:13:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
96:Articles for deletion
59:(non-admin closure)
597:
593:
405:
373:
322:
302:
260:Municipal council
113:Guide to deletion
103:How to contribute
61:
622:
587:
578:
576:
574:
558:
513:
480:
399:
396:
393:
387:
385:
383:
367:
364:
361:
355:
353:
351:
297:
290:
248:
247:
233:
185:
173:
155:
93:
75:
67:
57:
34:
630:
629:
625:
624:
623:
621:
620:
619:
618:
612:deletion review
598:
569:
567:
554:
509:
476:
452:user:ravenswing
406:
397:
394:
391:
378:
376:
374:
365:
362:
359:
346:
344:
317:
293:
288:
190:
181:
146:
130:
127:
90:
87:
70:
63:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
628:
626:
617:
616:
577:
566:
565:
564:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
386:
375:
354:
343:
342:
341:
324:
323:
315:
303:
251:
250:
187:
126:
125:
120:
110:
105:
88:
86:
81:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
627:
615:
613:
609:
605:
600:
599:
596:
591:
586:
585:
584:
575:
572:
563:
560:
559:
557:
550:
547:
546:
533:
529:
525:
520:
519:
518:
515:
514:
512:
505:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
482:
481:
479:
471:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
445:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
404:
401:
400:
384:
381:
372:
369:
368:
352:
349:
340:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
321:
318:
313:
309:
304:
301:
298:
296:
295:(Lets talk📧)
291:
285:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
246:
242:
239:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
196:
193:
192:Find sources:
188:
184:
180:
177:
171:
167:
163:
159:
154:
150:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:
124:
121:
118:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
100:
99:
97:
92:
85:
82:
80:
79:
76:
73:
68:
66:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
603:
601:
582:
581:
568:
555:
553:
548:
510:
508:
503:
477:
475:
469:
430:
408:
407:
390:
377:
358:
345:
327:
294:
289:Megan Barris
252:
240:
234:
226:
219:
213:
207:
201:
191:
178:
132:Duo-raadslid
89:
84:Duo-raadslid
71:
64:
49:
47:
31:
28:
556:Ravenswing
511:Ravenswing
478:Ravenswing
217:free images
608:talk page
334:per nom.
37:talk page
610:or in a
571:Relisted
380:Relisted
348:Relisted
336:Reywas92
176:View log
117:glossary
39:or in a
583:Kadzi
549:Delete:
431:Comment
312:~ Amkgp
256:WP:ATDs
223:WP refs
211:scholar
149:protect
144:history
94:New to
524:gidonb
490:gidonb
456:gidonb
448:Boleyn
435:Boleyn
417:gidonb
268:Boleyn
195:Google
153:delete
409:Merge
328:Merge
238:JSTOR
199:books
183:Stats
170:views
162:watch
158:links
74:erial
50:merge
16:<
590:talk
528:talk
504:real
494:talk
470:read
460:talk
439:talk
421:talk
272:talk
231:FENS
205:news
166:logs
140:talk
136:edit
411:to
398:Son
366:Son
330:to
262:or
245:TWL
174:– (
52:to
530:)
496:)
462:)
441:)
423:)
395:My
363:My
316:💬
310:.
286:.
274:)
225:)
168:|
164:|
160:|
156:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
65:——
56:.
592:)
588:(
526:(
492:(
458:(
437:(
419:(
392:D
360:D
270:(
249:)
241:·
235:·
227:·
220:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
197:(
189:(
186:)
179:·
172:)
134:(
119:)
115:(
72:S
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.