418:
You may wish to re-read that essay you cited. Unlike you, I have actually worked to improve this article. If you think the sources I've added are misleading or questionable, state why instead of linking a seemingly irrelevant essay.
200:
445:
I think user MB just answered that below. I really don't know why time should be spent on this building which may be torn down before we finish this discussion. There is much else to do. I must move on.
471:. Local interest only. A couple of articles about the city discussing whether or not to tear it down. Not much turned up about it for the prior 70 years since it opened. Does not pass
194:
161:
336:– Sorry, no change in my !vote. Unless we get beyond news from 2019 and find some real historical interest in the property it remains non-notable per WP standards. –
284:
239:. The building does not appear to have formal recognition of any cultural importance on the level that would justify its article. It also does not appear to pass
264:
108:
93:
134:
129:
138:
121:
396:
Sorry but the material you added about no equipment inside, discussions of demolition, etc. seems to bring it further into the a
215:
88:
81:
17:
182:
102:
98:
176:
498:
40:
481:
455:
428:
409:
387:
366:
345:
320:
296:
276:
256:
63:
172:
125:
222:
494:
36:
117:
69:
341:
316:
292:
272:
252:
424:
383:
236:
208:
451:
405:
362:
58:
188:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
493:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
240:
337:
312:
288:
268:
248:
420:
397:
379:
331:
472:
447:
401:
375:
358:
232:
53:
308:
155:
374:
I've added additional references and an image to the article, now passes
476:
489:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
147:
143:
357:
as above. It is a dusty, unused building. Fails WP:N.
207:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
501:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
263:Note: This discussion has been included in the
221:
8:
309:Pinal County Historical Society & Museum
285:list of Arizona-related deletion discussions
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
282:
262:
265:list of Film-related deletion discussions
231:This article on an abandoned building in
7:
243:. I'd propose that the article be
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
482:00:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
456:01:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
429:14:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
410:10:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
346:02:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
64:10:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
388:11:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
367:21:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
321:19:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
297:06:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
277:06:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
257:06:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
518:
307:– I've looked for RS. The
491:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
311:has nothing on it. –
82:Articles for deletion
299:
279:
118:Dust Bowl Theater
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
70:Dust Bowl Theater
509:
335:
235:appears to fail
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
61:
56:
34:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:deletion review
329:
168:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
515:
513:
504:
503:
485:
484:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
413:
412:
391:
390:
369:
351:
350:
349:
348:
324:
323:
301:
300:
280:
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
514:
502:
500:
496:
492:
487:
486:
483:
480:
479:
474:
470:
467:
466:
457:
453:
449:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
430:
426:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
352:
347:
343:
339:
333:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:Eloy, Arizona
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
490:
488:
477:
468:
400:territory.
371:
354:
304:
244:
237:WP:NBUILDING
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
195:free images
289:Mikehawk10
269:Mikehawk10
249:Mikehawk10
495:talk page
421:NemesisAT
380:NemesisAT
332:NemesisAT
241:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
497:or in a
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
448:Ode+Joy
402:Ode+Joy
398:WP:Junk
359:Ode+Joy
338:S. Rich
313:S. Rich
245:deleted
201:WP refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
473:WP:GNG
469:Delete
376:WP:GNG
355:Delete
305:Delete
173:Google
139:delete
60:plicit
50:delete
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
452:talk
425:talk
406:talk
384:talk
372:Keep
363:talk
342:talk
317:talk
293:talk
287:. —
273:talk
267:. —
253:talk
247:. —
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
223:TWL
160:– (
478:MB
475:.
454:)
427:)
408:)
386:)
378:.
365:)
344:)
319:)
295:)
275:)
255:)
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
450:(
423:(
404:(
382:(
361:(
340:(
334::
330:@
315:(
291:(
271:(
251:(
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.