262:
302:
Dynamic CSS is one of those ideas which sound like a good idea, until you think through the details. If the stylesheet(s) become dynamic, then they break a couple of the assumptions which we normally rely on to make the web efficient. Stylesheets which are stable and do not have temporal dependencies
374:
from an earlier generation, and not many folks are foolish enough to try it. That doesn't mean it's not a thing, nor that it hasn't been tried, nor that it might not even be a notable topic in its own right, perhaps. It needs to be mentioned, described, and dismissed with suitable citations
272:
dynamic), it does show that there should be something written about CSS preprocessors somewhere on this wiki. If we stretch the term hard enough those awful hacks can probably be seen as their spiritual (like... NodeJS/JScript type spiritual) precursors.
240:
Contested PROD, but no improvement in the weeks since. Unimportant technique, with extremely sparse sourcing. Technically this is not a popular technique because it's just not a good idea to do it (it's of little use, and it breaks the
209:
203:
303:
on their associated page can be cached and shared between many pages. Using dynamic CSS breaks that. As a result, it never became a popular technique, or relevant to us here.
135:
130:
139:
321:
162:
122:
169:
397:
thing? It doesn't become one unless it's a technique that is discussed in secondary sources, and as a technique of so little use, it never achieved this.
109:
94:
224:
191:
281:
506:
476:
411:
388:
361:
333:
312:
285:
254:
185:
64:
242:
89:
82:
17:
181:
126:
231:
103:
99:
118:
70:
485:
357:
343:
294:
523:
40:
471:
384:
329:
197:
407:
308:
250:
519:
353:
36:
277:
429:
371:
217:
466:
380:
325:
453:
465:
Stormer might be the originator of the idea (I don't know) but he is cited by several others.
403:
304:
246:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
518:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
402:
Merging it into CSS would be an even worse situation, giving a false impression of UNDUE.
274:
261:
497:
379:
it to the CSS article (probably), or even developing and citing the article, so be it.
55:
440:
156:
430:"Personalized websites for mobile devices using dynamic cascading style sheets"
445:
covers it over six pages starting on p.139 (and they seem to think it is a
514:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
488:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
346:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
425:. It may be a dumb idea, but it is found in the literature;
245:
model that efficient use of the web generally relies on).
458:
devotes a chapter to it, and also seems to like the idea.
152:
148:
144:
216:
442:
Designing with
Javascript: Creating Dynamic Web Pages
494:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
352:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
297:and CSS pre-processors are not dynamic CSS though.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
526:). No further edits should be made to this page.
434:International Journal of Web Information Systems
320:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Given how it mentions less and scss (which are
322:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
230:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
319:
7:
455:DHTML and CSS for the World Wide Web
370:OK, so it's a terrible idea, like
24:
260:
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
119:Dynamic cascading style sheets
71:Dynamic cascading style sheets
1:
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
543:
375:somewhere. If that means
65:09:08, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
516:Please do not modify it.
507:18:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
477:17:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
439:Nick Heinle, Bill Peña,
412:09:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
389:08:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
362:03:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
334:02:42, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
313:00:21, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
286:22:04, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
255:21:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
452:Jason Cranford Teague,
83:Articles for deletion
372:self-modifying code
509:
505:
364:
336:
284:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
534:
504:
502:
495:
493:
491:
489:
428:Henrik Stormer,
351:
349:
347:
280:
264:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
542:
541:
537:
536:
535:
533:
532:
531:
530:
524:deletion review
510:
498:
496:
484:
482:
365:
342:
340:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
540:
538:
529:
528:
492:
481:
480:
479:
462:
461:
460:
459:
450:
437:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
399:
398:
350:
339:
338:
337:
317:
316:
315:
299:
298:
289:
288:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
539:
527:
525:
521:
517:
512:
511:
508:
503:
501:
490:
487:
478:
475:
474:
470:
469:
464:
463:
457:
456:
451:
448:
444:
443:
438:
435:
431:
427:
426:
424:
421:
420:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
381:Chiswick Chap
378:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
348:
345:
335:
331:
327:
326:Coolabahapple
323:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
300:
296:
293:
292:
291:
290:
287:
283:
279:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
515:
513:
499:
483:
472:
467:
454:
446:
441:
433:
422:
404:Andy Dingley
394:
393:But is it a
376:
341:
305:Andy Dingley
269:
265:
247:Andy Dingley
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
204:free images
500:Sandstein
58:Sandstein
520:talk page
354:T. Canens
37:talk page
522:or in a
486:Relisted
468:Spinning
344:Relisted
266:Comment:
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
436:, 2005.
395:notable
377:merging
275:Artoria
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
449:idea).
182:Google
140:delete
473:Spark
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
447:good
423:Keep
408:talk
385:talk
358:talk
330:talk
309:talk
295:Less
251:talk
243:REST
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
278:2e5
270:not
232:TWL
161:– (
432:,
410:)
387:)
360:)
332:)
324:.
311:)
282:🌉
273:--
253:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
406:(
383:(
356:(
328:(
307:(
249:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.