Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/EEWeb - Knowledge

Source 📝

346:
and they are both legitimate sources of news and journalism in the electronics industry. However, you're correct in saying that there's a lack of reliable sources and that is my fault. So, to fix this issue, I will refresh the article with reliable 3rd-party sources and references to bolster the
250:
is related to this and is a legitimate and accredited source of journalism. EEWeb does seem to be quite popular as a forum, and seeing as it is directly related to the EE Times, I think that's why it wasn't originally deleted even though it was proposed to be deleted.
311:: Blogs and press releases can support information in the article but cannot be used to establish notability. There are nearly no reliable sources cited that establish notability; there should be a search for more sources and added, if any exist. 432:
to name a few. Are notability requirements different for those magazines - I only ask because those articles are standing despite a huge lack of references. In any case, I've added more references and condensed much of the text.
199: 415:
I've cleaned up the article considerably, adding references to bolster it. Also, I've added some categories, since EEWeb is an online magazine for electronics. These 3rd-party sources should suffice.
160: 268: 288: 193: 420:
I also noticed that in the categories of other similar online magazines, a huge number of them lack references and are effectively stubs. Some examples are:
107: 92: 469: 347:
legitimacy of this article. I'll have those prepared and update the article accordingly. Thank you for allowing discussion on this.
87: 80: 17: 399:(the article is about a company, so I think this policy would apply). Also issues with source reliability, as per Multi7001. 246:- I don't think that NCORP applies here, but I don't have enough experience to definitively say so. Here's my piece: the 101: 97: 214: 451: 365: 181: 512: 133: 128: 40: 491: 473: 137: 465: 120: 508: 256: 36: 175: 331: 252: 421: 400: 233: 53: 487: 316: 296: 276: 207: 54: 171: 425: 380: 124: 495: 476: 442: 405: 385: 356: 320: 300: 280: 260: 238: 62: 461: 438: 429: 352: 76: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
507:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
221: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
343: 116: 68: 396: 335: 231: 312: 292: 272: 375: 434: 348: 187: 230:
Sources are unreliable, mostly from blogs and directory listings. Fails WP:NCORP.
154: 247: 339: 503:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
454:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
368:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
150: 146: 142: 206: 460:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
374:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 338:is a reason to delete this article. As mentioned, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 515:). No further edits should be made to this page. 287:Note: This discussion has been included in the 267:Note: This discussion has been included in the 269:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 289:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 220: 8: 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 286: 266: 7: 24: 93:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 496:21:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC) 477:10:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 443:03:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC) 406:09:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 386:23:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC) 357:03:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC) 321:14:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC) 301:17:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 281:17:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 261:18:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 239:16:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 63:17:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC) 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 532: 505:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 486:per nom and Multi7001. 342:is closely related to 81:Articles for deletion 422:Hands-On Electronics 334:said, I don't think 426:Modern Electronics 479: 430:Electronics World 388: 303: 283: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 523: 459: 457: 455: 383: 378: 373: 371: 369: 225: 224: 210: 158: 140: 78: 60: 58: 34: 531: 530: 526: 525: 524: 522: 521: 520: 519: 513:deletion review 450: 448: 402:MrsSnoozyTurtle 389: 381: 376: 364: 362: 236: 167: 131: 115: 112: 75: 72: 56: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 529: 527: 518: 517: 499: 498: 488:Colonestarrice 458: 446: 445: 417: 416: 408: 395:Does not meet 372: 361: 360: 359: 324: 323: 305: 304: 284: 234: 228: 227: 164: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 528: 516: 514: 510: 506: 501: 500: 497: 493: 489: 485: 482: 481: 480: 478: 475: 471: 467: 463: 456: 453: 444: 440: 436: 431: 427: 423: 419: 418: 414: 413: 409: 407: 404: 403: 398: 394: 391: 390: 387: 384: 379: 370: 367: 358: 354: 350: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 326: 325: 322: 318: 314: 310: 307: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 265: 264: 263: 262: 258: 254: 249: 245: 241: 240: 237: 232: 223: 219: 216: 213: 209: 205: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 173: 170: 169:Find sources: 165: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 504: 502: 483: 462:filelakeshoe 449: 447: 411: 410: 401: 392: 363: 327: 308: 243: 242: 229: 217: 211: 203: 196: 190: 184: 178: 168: 74: 49: 47: 31: 28: 332:Monstarules 253:Monstarules 194:free images 509:talk page 313:Multi7001 293:Shellwood 273:Shellwood 235:(discuss) 37:talk page 511:or in a 452:Relisted 397:WP:NCORP 366:Relisted 336:WP:NCORP 248:EE Times 161:View log 102:glossary 55:—⁠Scotty 39:or in a 435:MWatari 349:MWatari 340:EETimes 244:Comment 200:WP refs 188:scholar 134:protect 129:history 79:New to 484:Delete 393:Delete 382:plicit 309:Delete 172:Google 138:delete 50:delete 344:EEWeb 330:: As 215:JSTOR 176:books 155:views 147:watch 143:links 117:EEWeb 69:EEWeb 16:< 492:talk 439:talk 412:Keep 353:talk 328:Keep 317:talk 297:talk 277:talk 257:talk 208:FENS 182:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 57:Wong 222:TWL 159:– ( 59:⁠— 494:) 474:🐱 472:) 468:/ 441:) 428:, 424:, 355:) 319:) 299:) 291:. 279:) 271:. 259:) 202:) 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 52:. 490:( 470:c 466:t 464:( 437:( 377:✗ 351:( 315:( 295:( 275:( 255:( 226:) 218:· 212:· 204:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 179:· 174:( 166:( 163:) 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
—⁠ScottyWong⁠—
17:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
EEWeb

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
EEWeb
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.