Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Emma Vigeland (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

270:
There are no RS in the article. In case anyone gets confused, the "Hill" sources are links to clips from a web-show hosted by the Hill where the subject of the article has appeared. They are not news reports by the Hill. As there is no RS on this person, it's impossible to write a proper article.
205: 251:
article/video and a user-contributed Medium article. I will remind fans of Vigeland's YouTube content or Twitter punditry that her followers or subscribers do not automatically merit a Knowledge (XXG) article.
158: 287: 199: 306: 90: 105: 271:
There was a clear consensus to delete this page in 2017, and there has been no RS coverage of her since then to justify keeping this time around.
165: 85: 78: 17: 131: 126: 135: 378: 345: 317: 298: 280: 261: 60: 118: 220: 99: 95: 187: 57: 395: 40: 276: 181: 240: 53: 177: 391: 272: 122: 36: 227: 329: 213: 114: 66: 341: 253: 374: 361:
of other progressives have done online: criticize leaders of both parties. How does that pass
310: 291: 74: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
390:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
354: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
362: 244: 193: 257: 366: 337: 370: 152: 248: 386:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
357:
and Too soon. I don't see anything she's done other than what
239:
Vigeland does not meet notability standards established by
247:. The article only lists four sources, including a dead 148: 144: 140: 212: 226: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 398:). No further edits should be made to this page. 305:Note: This discussion has been included in the 286:Note: This discussion has been included in the 288:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 8: 106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 307:list of Women-related deletion discussions 304: 285: 332:for Ms. Vigeland. Happy to make it a 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 91:Introduction to deletion process 1: 379:17:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC) 346:00:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 318:19:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 299:19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 281:18:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 262:18:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC) 61:22:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC) 81:(AfD)? Read these primers! 415: 388:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 336:in case things change. 79:Articles for deletion 237:Delete as nominator 320: 301: 96:Guide to deletion 86:How to contribute 406: 365:? I don't see a 328:– Appears to be 315: 296: 273:Snooganssnoogans 231: 230: 216: 168: 156: 138: 76: 34: 414: 413: 409: 408: 407: 405: 404: 403: 402: 396:deletion review 311: 292: 173: 164: 129: 113: 110: 73: 70: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 412: 410: 401: 400: 382: 381: 348: 322: 321: 302: 283: 241:WP:ENTERTAINER 234: 233: 170: 109: 108: 103: 93: 88: 71: 69: 64: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 411: 399: 397: 393: 389: 384: 383: 380: 376: 372: 368: 367:man bites dog 364: 360: 356: 352: 349: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 324: 323: 319: 316: 314: 308: 303: 300: 297: 295: 289: 284: 282: 278: 274: 269: 266: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 250: 246: 242: 238: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175:Find sources: 171: 167: 163: 160: 154: 150: 146: 142: 137: 133: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115:Emma Vigeland 112: 111: 107: 104: 101: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 83: 82: 80: 75: 68: 67:Emma Vigeland 65: 63: 62: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 387: 385: 358: 350: 333: 325: 313:CAPTAIN RAJU 312: 294:CAPTAIN RAJU 293: 267: 236: 235: 223: 217: 209: 202: 196: 190: 184: 174: 161: 72: 49: 47: 31: 28: 369:case here. 334:soft delete 200:free images 330:WP:TOOSOON 392:talk page 359:thousands 37:talk page 394:or in a 338:Missvain 159:View log 100:glossary 39:or in a 371:Bearian 355:WP:MILL 268:DELETE. 249:SF Gate 206:WP refs 194:scholar 132:protect 127:history 77:New to 363:WP:GNG 351:Delete 326:Delete 245:WP:GNG 178:Google 136:delete 58:(talk) 50:delete 254:KidAd 221:JSTOR 182:books 166:Stats 153:views 145:watch 141:links 16:< 375:talk 353:per 342:talk 277:talk 258:talk 214:FENS 188:news 149:logs 123:talk 119:edit 243:or 228:TWL 157:– ( 54:PMC 52:. ♠ 377:) 344:) 309:. 290:. 279:) 260:) 208:) 151:| 147:| 143:| 139:| 134:| 130:| 125:| 121:| 56:♠ 373:( 340:( 275:( 256:( 232:) 224:· 218:· 210:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 180:( 172:( 169:) 162:· 155:) 117:( 102:) 98:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
PMC
(talk)
22:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Emma Vigeland

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Emma Vigeland
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.