Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Employee relations - Knowledge

Source 📝

515:. Professionally speaking, I understand the differences in the various terms from a labor market perspective. That said, in reality, the definition varies from one culture to the next. Having worked in state government with California and Washington State, I am aware that both state labor markets define the terms differently. The terms additionally differentiate from one region and one country to the next. It is clear that this article was created to highlight and promote one organization's interpretation of the terms used. At this point, the content is not differentiated to the point that a separate article presenting one view would be universally understood or accepted. Until that point, I recommend redirecting to 240:. For now, anyway. The subject is one that could potentially be the subject of its own article at some point in time. However at this point in time the article is just a dictionary definition copied from someone's website, which wouldn't be a reliable source even if there weren't concerns of COI and copyvio. There's some definite promotional undertones to this, as the website just so happens to be soliciting its services and products for various people. As far as any COI goes, I want to stress that the original article creator is someone who does web design and 330:. Keep it if someone rework the article to make it useful (which it definitely isn't, due to the problems that Harry identifies), or redirect per Tokyogirl if not. Remember that titles should only be deleted if they're not going to be useful redirects. Due to the copyright issue (there's an OTRS pending template at the talk page), if redirecting be the solution, it might be safest to delete this and immediately recreate it as a redirect. 244:. This is pretty much a further attempt to promote the company. All that aside, like I said- there is merit in expanding that section about employee relations from the Employment page. This just isn't the way to go about it. Unless someone else can expand the content using reliable sources I'm willing to change my opinion, but as the article is now? Nuke it. 410:
There are job titles of "employee relations manager", "Adviser- Employee Relations", and "Employee Relations Supervisor". If someone wanted to write out more information than would fit in the employment article, I'd say keep. If not, it seems to be covered over there. Just redirect for now, and if
312:
whose primary purpose is to promote the business interests of the articles creator, and based solely on one extremely unreliable source. Best to flush it entirely, and build any future spin-off article on clean soil, rather than trying to salvage and expand on anything here. No evidence that a
487:. The article itself says it's synonymous with "employment relations" (which redirects to industrial relations); Knowledge articles are normally about things/concepts, not terms, and having two articles about the same thing is a form of 348:
What concerns me is that even if the text is usable without copyright issues, I'm not sure that this is really all that usable as a reliable source in the grand scheme of things. Probably better to just toss it and re-write it
179: 218:
as the only source is the article creator's own blog, from which the article is basically copied. This leads to the suspicion that this article was created solely for the purpose of promoting the creator's blog.
132: 173: 543: 214:. Any expansion should happen there if there is something missing from that article (with reliable sources, not one self-published by the article creator). Fails 284:- verges on the dictionary defintion; seems to have been created as a coatrack to provide an excuse for a weblink to the creator's client's website. -- 139: 105: 100: 109: 92: 194: 161: 17: 406: 579: 471: 223: 595:
which seems to be a more developed article. If sources show this is the correct name instead then it can be moved back.
304:: Blatantly self-promotional OR that has zero utility as the basis of a future spinoff article. Right now, it's just a 155: 652: 382: 318: 267:
is to improve rather than to delete and this is clearly possible as numerous have been written about this topic.
40: 635: 604: 583: 555: 534: 503: 475: 452: 434: 400: 358: 339: 322: 296: 276: 253: 228: 74: 467: 272: 151: 408: 96: 201: 648: 354: 249: 36: 391:. However clearly we do not need a 3rd article on the topic using "employee" instead of "employment". 626: 616:, which covers the same topic. Plausible search term. Merge, if there's anything of value to merge.-- 613: 592: 516: 512: 484: 463: 440: 375: 371: 314: 291: 53: 600: 527: 268: 264: 187: 571: 496: 448: 396: 88: 80: 381:. This page was created as an advertisement for one self-published book (now removed). Whether 167: 551: 335: 57: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
647:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
386: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
412: 389: 350: 305: 245: 379: 241: 617: 567: 488: 309: 285: 596: 520: 575: 492: 444: 392: 547: 495: 331: 215: 126: 405:
There is ample coverage about this, as Google news archive search easily finds.
236: 211: 439:
It's part of the re-branding campaign of IR. Well explained in the lead of
385:
and IR/ER is the same topic or not is indeed a matter of some debate
411:
enough information is added, make it into a content fork later on.
643:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
122: 118: 114: 186: 519:, which currently appears to serve as a "catchall". 313:spin-off article is justified at the present time. 56:. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 655:). No further edits should be made to this page. 544:list of Business-related deletion discussions 200: 8: 542:Note: This debate has been included in the 541: 7: 242:designed the website for Oakbridge 24: 388:, depending how one defines HRM 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 466:, which is the same topic. -- 1: 636:00:18, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 605:19:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 584:12:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC) 556:18:19, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 535:18:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 504:16:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 476:07:19, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 453:22:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 435:22:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 401:19:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 359:14:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 340:13:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 323:13:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 297:13:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 277:13:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 254:09:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 229:08:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) 75:20:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 566:as per above. Unnecessary 672: 378:and "employee relations" 645:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 328:Don't delete the title 614:industrial relations 593:Industrial relations 517:industrial relations 513:industrial relations 485:industrial relations 464:industrial relations 441:industrial relations 376:employment relations 372:industrial relations 54:industrial relations 570:, but useful term ( 468:Boing! said Zebedee 210:Already covered in 89:Employee relations 81:Employee relations 558: 500: 663: 633: 624: 533: 530: 523: 502: 497: 431: 428: 425: 422: 419: 416: 294: 288: 226: 222: 205: 204: 190: 142: 130: 112: 72: 34: 671: 670: 666: 665: 664: 662: 661: 660: 659: 653:deletion review 627: 618: 528: 525: 521: 499: 489:content forkery 429: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 315:Dominus Vobisdu 292: 286: 224: 220: 147: 138: 103: 87: 84: 68: 64: 58: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 669: 667: 658: 657: 639: 638: 607: 589:Merge/Redirect 586: 564:Merge/Redirect 560: 559: 538: 537: 506: 498: 481:Redirect/Merge 478: 457: 456: 455: 403: 374:also known as 364: 363: 362: 361: 343: 342: 325: 299: 279: 265:editing policy 257: 256: 221:Harry the Dog 208: 207: 144: 83: 78: 66: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 668: 656: 654: 650: 646: 641: 640: 637: 634: 631: 625: 623: 622: 615: 611: 608: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 587: 585: 581: 578: 577: 573: 569: 565: 562: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 540: 539: 536: 531: 524: 518: 514: 510: 507: 505: 501: 494: 490: 486: 482: 479: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 437: 436: 433: 432: 409: 407: 404: 402: 398: 394: 390: 387: 384: 380: 377: 373: 369: 366: 365: 360: 356: 352: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 337: 333: 329: 326: 324: 320: 316: 311: 307: 303: 300: 298: 295: 289: 283: 280: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 258: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 238: 233: 232: 231: 230: 227: 217: 213: 203: 199: 196: 193: 189: 185: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 153: 150: 149:Find sources: 145: 141: 137: 134: 128: 124: 120: 116: 111: 107: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 85: 82: 79: 77: 76: 73: 71: 70: 69: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 644: 642: 629: 620: 619: 609: 588: 574: 563: 508: 480: 459: 413: 367: 327: 301: 281: 260: 235:Redirect to 234: 209: 197: 191: 183: 176: 170: 164: 158: 148: 135: 61: 60: 59: 49: 47: 31: 28: 351:Tokyogirl79 287:Orange Mike 246:Tokyogirl79 174:free images 621:xanchester 529:talk to me 237:Employment 212:Employment 65:rbitrarily 649:talk page 597:Insomesia 548:• Gene93k 349:entirely. 306:WP:DICDEF 37:talk page 651:or in a 610:Redirect 576:BWilkins 568:WP:CFORK 509:Redirect 460:Redirect 445:Tijfo098 393:Tijfo098 368:Redirect 310:WP:CFORK 133:View log 50:redirect 39:or in a 332:Nyttend 180:WP refs 168:scholar 106:protect 101:history 493:Ƶ§œš¹ 302:Delete 282:Delete 269:Warden 152:Google 110:delete 522:Cindy 491:. — 430:Focus 216:WP:OR 195:JSTOR 156:books 140:Stats 127:views 119:watch 115:links 16:< 601:talk 552:talk 472:talk 449:talk 397:talk 355:talk 336:talk 319:talk 308:and 293:Talk 273:talk 263:Our 261:Keep 250:talk 225:WOOF 188:FENS 162:news 123:logs 97:talk 93:edit 612:to 591:to 511:to 483:to 462:to 383:HRM 370:to 202:TWL 131:– ( 52:to 603:) 582:) 580:←✎ 572:✉→ 554:) 546:. 474:) 451:) 443:. 399:) 357:) 338:) 321:) 290:| 275:) 252:) 182:) 125:| 121:| 117:| 113:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 632:) 630:t 628:( 599:( 550:( 532:) 526:( 470:( 447:( 427:m 424:a 421:e 418:r 415:D 395:( 353:( 334:( 317:( 271:( 248:( 206:) 198:· 192:· 184:· 177:· 171:· 165:· 159:· 154:( 146:( 143:) 136:· 129:) 91:( 67:0 63:A

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
industrial relations
Arbitrarily0
20:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Employee relations
Employee relations
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Employment
WP:OR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.