584:
Side question - is the !vote for delete something chosen over and above, say, a merger proposal? You note the existence of McClard's article, but a deletion here makes a redlink, which makes it impossible to connect the bands on the label to each other. I'm not necessarily opposed in general to
510:
article exists, perhaps it's not totally necessary. I don't think anything
Chubbles wrote is incorrect; I just didn't find enough sources (through ProQuest, so far). I do disagree with part of Graywalls's argument: hardcore punk culture is, of course, of interest throughout the world.
437:
insofar as that music is of encyclopedic interest. WP:MUSIC suggests a definition of an important indie label, and since this is a musical topic, we should look to guidelines created by musical subject experts to evaluate it. There's no necessary reason why we would use NCORP, nor even a
234:. Just like a lot of corner stores, dry cleaners, small factories and what not that existed for decades that are only notable within the small local community, this is only notable in the niche community and is not sufficiently notable for a wiki article.
663:, which I refer to here perhaps too loosely as "zines", actually had editorial control and weren't SPS in the way Knowledge uses the term. They would be first-call sources for information on music of the sort Ebullition released.
585:
merging label and label-owner articles, though in this case I think the information is better suited to the label article than the man's article (his label and publishing output gets more notice than he himself ever did).
478:
Would you agree that WP:MUSIC (and, by extension, the lede of NCORP) should be modified so that bands and musical ensembles should fall under NCORP, as "a group of more than one person formed together for a purpose"?
195:
529:
My argument is that this business entity is not of adequate general interest, just as local meat repacking plant with local presence isn't even if they process packaging for companies like Tyson and Hormel.
291:
460:
Entirely disagree. Publishers publish books by authors. Galleries exhibit art by artists. Those things too are bound by NCORP/NORG. Record labels is similar. Run your argument past other editors at
506:- Happy to be proven wrong, but don't see a lot of coverage--and I say that as someone who owned a lot of these seven inches and who read the zine. I found this article interesting, but, since a
570:... I just haven't found anything beyond a line here or there. I also agree that it doesn't make sense to apply WP:NCORP to record labels, or to try to divorce them from their artists.
442:
reason to do so, when we have subject-specific guidance - any more than we would use NCORP to evaluate a band (even though, were they not specifically excluded from NCORP, bands would
189:
566:
Right, it was just the database I chose after doing a Google search. I agree that coverage may be mostly in books about punk culture or zines. I remember one book titled
311:
271:
156:
251:
384:
638:, and the "reliably published" requirements for sourcing. while I was quite sure NCORP is the appropriate bar to be met, I checked with others just to be sure.
331:
433:
That completely misses the point of NOTINHERITED. Record labels literally do one thing - they release music by musicians. They are of encyclopedic interest
419:. I looked at NMUSIC again and I'm seeing nothing saying recording companies and record labels should be evaluated according to NMUSIC criteria over NCORP.
103:
88:
690:
If this was "more inportant" for a decade, we would have multiple reliable sources covering it. We need sources, not empty assertions of notability.
627:
129:
124:
133:
390:
by Alan O'Connor gives valuable context about the label's place in 90s-era DIY punk. Our coverage of hardcore is incomplete without it.
116:
210:
177:
83:
76:
17:
411:
you name dropped bands. Association with these bands doesn't cause the company to inherit notability and this is what
372:
97:
93:
230:
as a distribution business/record label. Having notable bands pumped through is not an assumption of notability per
171:
735:
695:
639:
461:
40:
718:
699:
672:
650:
608:
594:
579:
561:
539:
520:
488:
473:
455:
428:
399:
340:
323:
303:
283:
263:
243:
58:
167:
120:
714:
217:
731:
336:
36:
691:
412:
368:
231:
646:
535:
469:
424:
319:
299:
279:
259:
239:
203:
668:
604:
590:
575:
557:
516:
484:
451:
395:
112:
64:
53:
183:
709:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
730:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
548:
a lot there, it would move strongly in
Ebullition's favor); 1990s-era punk zines other than
544:
I disagree that ProQuest is the best place to look for sources (though, of course, if there
376:
352:
227:
642:
531:
465:
420:
416:
351:. One of the more important independent labels of the 1990s (in the sense suggested by
315:
295:
275:
255:
235:
664:
635:
617:
600:
586:
571:
553:
512:
480:
447:
391:
622:, why do you believe zines are acceptable sources? I don't believe zines qualify as
623:
507:
655:
If we're talking about basement zine productions, then yes. But publications like
150:
415:
means. An opinion statement of "legendary" by a magazine, doesn't count towards
640:
Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Appropriate_SNG_for_record_labels/recording_companies
599:
Yeah, a merger works--and I always prefer that the BLP be the one "to go."
462:
WT:Notability#Appropriate_SNG_for_record_labels/recording_companies
707:— NCORP is simply not met, there are insufficient coverage in RS.
726:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
292:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
359:, maybe the third-most-important indie punk magazine after
630:
description. "For the uninitiated, zines are small-run,
146:
142:
138:
202:
626:, especially not for establishing notability. See
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
738:). No further edits should be made to this page.
330:Note: This discussion has been included in the
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
270:Note: This discussion has been included in the
250:Note: This discussion has been included in the
312:list of California-related deletion discussions
272:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
252:list of Business-related deletion discussions
216:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
332:list of Music-related deletion discussions
329:
309:
289:
269:
249:
7:
552:are going to be much better guides.
634:that span genres". So, this fails
383:magazine called them "legendary" (
367:. This is the label that released
24:
89:Introduction to deletion process
379:'s albums, and others to boot.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
755:
719:16:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
700:20:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
673:12:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
651:16:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
489:11:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
474:20:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
59:04:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
609:22:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
595:14:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
580:13:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
568:Fucked Up and Photocopied
562:11:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
540:21:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
521:17:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
456:11:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
446:fall under its purview).
429:22:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
400:14:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
341:09:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
324:01:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
304:01:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
284:01:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
264:01:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
244:01:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
728:Please do not modify it.
355:), and the publisher of
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Articles for deletion
632:self-published works
388:Punk Record Labels
113:Ebullition Records
65:Ebullition Records
692:John Pack Lambert
657:Maximum Rocknroll
361:Maximum RocknRoll
343:
326:
306:
286:
266:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
57:
746:
621:
386:), and the book
339:
221:
220:
206:
154:
136:
74:
56:
34:
754:
753:
749:
748:
747:
745:
744:
743:
742:
736:deletion review
615:
377:Reversal of Man
335:
163:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
752:
750:
741:
740:
722:
721:
702:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
613:
612:
611:
542:
524:
523:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
444:unquestionably
403:
402:
345:
344:
327:
307:
287:
267:
226:Fails to meet
224:
223:
160:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
751:
739:
737:
733:
729:
724:
723:
720:
716:
712:
711:
706:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
686:
685:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
619:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
592:
588:
583:
582:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
541:
537:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
518:
514:
509:
505:
502:
501:
490:
486:
482:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
436:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:WP:INHERITORG
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:Ghettoblaster
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
346:
342:
338:
337:North America
333:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:WP:INHERITORG
229:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
55:
54:Seraphimblade
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
727:
725:
710:Celestina007
708:
704:
687:
660:
656:
631:
567:
549:
545:
508:Kent McClard
503:
443:
439:
434:
408:
387:
380:
364:
360:
356:
348:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
70:
49:
47:
31:
28:
661:Punk Planet
550:HeartattacK
504:Weak delete
365:Punk Planet
357:HeartattacK
190:free images
732:talk page
643:Graywalls
532:Graywalls
466:Graywalls
421:Graywalls
316:Graywalls
296:Graywalls
276:Graywalls
256:Graywalls
236:Graywalls
37:talk page
734:or in a
665:Chubbles
618:Chubbles
601:Caro7200
587:Chubbles
572:Caro7200
554:Chubbles
513:Caro7200
481:Chubbles
448:Chubbles
392:Chubbles
375:'s, and
353:WP:MUSIC
228:WP:NCORP
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
417:WP:SIRS
409:comment
196:WP refs
184:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
705:Delete
688:Delete
636:WP:SPS
373:Orchid
168:Google
134:delete
50:delete
624:WP:RS
211:JSTOR
172:books
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
715:talk
696:talk
669:talk
659:and
647:talk
628:this
605:talk
591:talk
576:talk
558:talk
546:were
536:talk
517:talk
485:talk
470:talk
452:talk
440:good
435:only
425:talk
396:talk
371:'s,
369:Fuel
363:and
349:Keep
320:talk
300:talk
280:talk
260:talk
240:talk
204:FENS
178:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
218:TWL
155:– (
717:)
698:)
671:)
649:)
607:)
593:)
578:)
560:)
538:)
519:)
487:)
472:)
464:.
454:)
427:)
398:)
334:.
322:)
314:.
302:)
294:.
282:)
274:.
262:)
254:.
242:)
198:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
713:(
694:(
667:(
645:(
620::
616:@
603:(
589:(
574:(
556:(
534:(
515:(
483:(
468:(
450:(
423:(
394:(
318:(
298:(
278:(
258:(
238:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.