429:. Please notice the print ISSN and the electronic ISSN and compare to the subject of this AFD. I am now thinking that the subject of the AFD, the so-called academic journal "Economy and Finance" is a hoax. Also, the Knowledge article is probably a hoax. In fact the focus and coverage of the legitimate journal is very different from the coverage of the subject of this AFD. I think the legit journal also has a Russian web site. I will back to you on that. ---
308:
305:
464:. Note that recently, several sites have sprung up that assign "impact factors", based on non-stated criteria, but that have nothing to do with TR. Entering the ISSN into the TR Master Journal list (see link given by Steve above) does give a hit, but for a
304:. Per nominator and any indication of notability on this journal's web site appears to be inaccurate. Furthermore, a Google search for this particular title does not appear to produce any hits for this journal (please see
183:
82:
214:
In the four months since the last AFD, no improvement/sources have been forthcoming. The previous rationale still stands: "Non-notable journal. Despite what is claimed on its homepage, not included in the
511:
Yeah, something seems shady here. Failure to establish the IF through TR, combined with the other stuff, means absolutely nothing from the official website is to be trusted, and the journal fails to meet
421:
Here is something very interesting. I just entered the first eight digits of both ISSN numbers into TR's Master
Journal list. 1555-6492 (electronic) did not work. However, 1019-3316 (print) did work:
281:
177:
77:
136:
266:
143:
251:
490:. Hence, I see no reason at this pint to withdraw the now and would like to ask Headbomb to have a look at the stuff that Steve and I dug up. Thanks. --
109:
104:
113:
483:
s ISSN is "1019-3316". Entering the EaF ISSN into the OCLC database gives no hit, entering the version withou "-34" at the end leads, again,
96:
568:
543:
499:
438:
416:
399:
362:
319:
293:
273:
258:
243:
61:
198:
165:
216:
17:
422:
530:
386:
349:
376:
terrible, and blatantly copies
Wikipiedia in several places... Can someone confirm that it indeed has an impact factor?
407:, the fact that this journal copies Knowledge articles (which I didn't know) tells me this is a sham publication. ---
159:
484:
587:
40:
155:
448:
331:
100:
426:
205:
520:. That's certainly grounds for deletion, and we should look into any other journal from that "publisher".
92:
67:
583:
434:
412:
315:
270:
255:
36:
495:
239:
425:. Then I tried a Google search for the TR listed journal's name and have come to a Springer website
513:
336:
224:
191:
564:
526:
382:
345:
171:
289:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
582:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
538:
430:
408:
394:
357:
311:
491:
461:
235:
534:
390:
353:
223:). No independent sources, not indexed in any selective major database. Does not meet
560:
522:
457:
378:
341:
228:
57:
285:
130:
517:
220:
472:, with an IF of 0.214). Note that the ISSN given on the journal website of
53:
329:, the journal has an impact factor of 0.448, therefore is indexed by
446:
I have access to the
Sciences and Social Sciences editions of the
576:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
83:
Articles for deletion/Economy and
Finance (2nd nomination)
452:
and have checked (again): This journal is emphatically
126:
122:
118:
190:
282:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
590:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
559:- Non-notable given all of the above factors.
204:
8:
280:Note: This debate has been included in the
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
250:Note: This debate has been included in the
252:list of Russia-related deletion discussions
279:
264:
249:
470:HERALD OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
221:http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/
78:Articles for deletion/Economy and Finance
75:
7:
372:, although the publisher's website
74:
24:
476:is "1019-3316-34", whereas the
217:Science Citation Index Expanded
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
569:14:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
544:16:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
500:08:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
439:01:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
417:01:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
400:00:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
363:00:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
335:, therefore is notable per
320:15:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
294:14:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
274:22:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
259:22:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
244:12:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
62:21:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
607:
456:included in it and has no
579:Please do not modify it.
449:Journal Citation Reports
332:Journal Citation Reports
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
474:Economy and Finance
93:Economy and Finance
68:Economy and Finance
296:
276:
261:
598:
581:
542:
509:Change to delete
482:
398:
361:
271:Northamerica1000
256:Northamerica1000
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
48:The result was
34:
606:
605:
601:
600:
599:
597:
596:
595:
594:
588:deletion review
577:
521:
480:
468:journal (named
462:Thomson Reuters
377:
340:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
604:
602:
593:
592:
572:
571:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
503:
502:
402:
366:
365:
322:
298:
297:
277:
262:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
603:
591:
589:
585:
580:
574:
573:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
554:
545:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
519:
516:supported by
515:
510:
507:
506:
505:
504:
501:
497:
493:
489:
488:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
458:impact factor
455:
451:
450:
445:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
401:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
371:
368:
367:
364:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
338:
334:
333:
328:
327:
323:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
303:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
275:
272:
268:
263:
260:
257:
253:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
578:
575:
556:
514:WP:NJOURNALS
508:
486:
477:
473:
469:
465:
460:assigned by
453:
447:
443:
404:
373:
369:
337:WP:NJOURNALS
330:
325:
324:
301:
232:
225:WP:NJournals
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
431:Steve Quinn
409:Steve Quinn
312:Steve Quinn
178:free images
492:Randykitty
236:Randykitty
231:". Hence:
584:talk page
466:different
286:• Gene93k
37:talk page
586:or in a
561:PianoDan
531:contribs
523:Headbomb
387:contribs
379:Headbomb
350:contribs
342:Headbomb
137:View log
39:or in a
535:physics
485:to the
444:Comment
405:Comment
391:physics
370:Comment
354:physics
310:). ---
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
557:Delete
487:Herald
478:Herald
307:, and
302:Delete
233:Delete
229:WP:GNG
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
539:books
395:books
358:books
219:(see
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
565:talk
527:talk
518:WP:V
496:talk
435:talk
427:here
423:here
413:talk
383:talk
346:talk
326:Keep
316:talk
290:talk
240:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
52:. --
454:not
227:or
206:TWL
135:– (
54:BDD
567:)
537:/
533:/
529:/
498:)
437:)
415:)
393:/
389:/
385:/
374:is
356:/
352:/
348:/
339:.
318:)
292:)
284:.
269:.
254:.
242:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
563:(
541:}
525:{
494:(
481:'
433:(
411:(
397:}
381:{
360:}
344:{
314:(
288:(
238:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.