253:
the editor's letter on the masthead page of a minor special-interest magazine, not substantive coverage about him in a major media outlet. So these sources are failing right across the board to make him notable enough for a
Knowledge (XXG) article -- it's 80 per cent sources that can't support notability
379:
I am not claiming this individual to be Steven
Spielberg, however Eddie Zajdel is known for what he does in the film industry. This article is explaining in an unbiased way who Eddie Zajdel is and what he has done. This clearly fits the requirement for Knowledge (XXG). This article uses 11 sources to
383:
Knowledge (XXG) quotes "sources may encompass published works in any form and media, and in any language" just because this editor in his or her opinion dislikes the articles used to determine notability, does not mean in any way that they do not establish notability. This editors proposed deletion
367:
Another quote from the editor "just a short bit about him in the editor's letter on the masthead page of a minor special-interest magazine" again this source was not in any way intended to reference his notability of a director, but further establishing that he did indeed have a passion for art and
387:
This article is not the strongest article ever created on
Knowledge (XXG), but just because an editor briefly reads the article, reads none of the sources, makes irrelavent points personally assessing this individual, and fails to take the time to look deeper into the reasons why they were used is
359:
This editor who is proposing the deletion of this article believes he or she has significant points, except for the fact that they are entirely bias. He or she begins the dispute using the term "Junk
Sourcing" which is a personal stance taken entirely from the opinion of this editor, with no given
252:
on medium.com -- none of which are reliable or notability-supporting sources. And of the two sources that actually represent media coverage, both are covering him solely in the context of building stuff in his back yard when he was a teenager, and even one of those is just a short bit about him in
371:
The editor also quotes "it's 80 per cent sources that can't support notability at all, and 20 per cent sources that aren't covering him in a noteworthy context" This editor is taking the amount of sources listed and using that to determine "without even reading them" that they are not credible.
462:
be stacked onto directories like IMDb or a high school sports database, or their own self-published websites or social networking accounts — and if the reason why he "should" have a
Knowledge (XXG) article is that he makes films, then human interest coverage which supports where he went to high
363:
This editor begins by addressing issues from a personal standpoint, not reading the articles and leaving out the bigger picture. The editor proposing the deletion quotes "a directory listing of his record as a baseball player at the high school level" In the article this source, in no way was
375:
There are countless number or wikipedia pages that establish notability using 3 or less articles including IMDb and online publications. This article just happens to use 11 of them to further establish the notability of every sentence in the bio.
210:
278:
384:
article was poorly written with no concept, which demonstrates to me that he or she did not take the time to look deeper into the reasons these sources were used, and the true concept of this page.
56:. I would not be opposed to its recreation given time and on the condition that there be suitable sources at said time to demonstrate adequate notability per the relevant notability guideline(s).
248:(three times), Instagram posts (twice), a YouTube video, his own self-published website, a directory listing of his record as a baseball player at the high school level, and a piece of
163:
316:
297:
204:
95:
110:
364:
referring to the notability of this individual as baseball player, but rather further sourcing that this individual "graduated from Canton High School".
479:— only certain specific types of sources count as valid support for a person's notability, and none of the references here are the correct kind.
170:
416:
349:
90:
83:
17:
136:
131:
360:
points. This editor took very little time to truly assess what these sources are, and the reason why these sources were used.
140:
104:
100:
225:
475:
that a person automatically qualifies to have a
Knowledge (XXG) article as long as the things it says are referenced just
123:
192:
567:
40:
244:
of a film director, whose claims to notability are referenced entirely to junk sourcing. The references here include
186:
337:
546:
458:
of the thing that's being claimed as his reason for having an encyclopedia article. A person's notability
412:
395:
345:
182:
563:
550:
529:
512:
488:
399:
353:
327:
308:
289:
270:
65:
36:
501:
408:
391:
341:
127:
525:
232:
53:
218:
119:
71:
508:
57:
249:
542:
484:
320:
301:
282:
266:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
562:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
538:
420:
241:
521:
198:
435:
504:
480:
262:
157:
520:
social media user generated content and youtube are not RS. Way too soon. --
257:, and 20 per cent sources that aren't covering him in a noteworthy
245:
558:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
471:
does not constitute support for notability either. The rule is
442:, such as newspapers or magazines or books, which represent
380:
insure the notably of every word written in the article.
334:
THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DELETION
419:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
279:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
153:
149:
145:
388:
not in ANY WAY a reason for an article to be deleted.
217:
537:No reliable coverage from secondary sources, fails
231:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
570:). No further edits should be made to this page.
315:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
317:list of Michigan-related deletion discussions
298:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
430:References for the notability of a person
335:
314:
295:
276:
454:than himself, and which are covering him
52:. At the moment, this article is simply
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
1:
551:00:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
66:17:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
530:19:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
513:06:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
489:20:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
400:15:48, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
368:creation at a young age.
354:15:50, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
328:21:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
309:21:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
290:21:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
271:21:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
587:
560:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
250:user-generated content
405:Note to closing admin
84:Articles for deletion
541:. Not notable yet.
465:nothing whatsoever
424:
356:
340:comment added by
330:
311:
292:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
578:
463:school but says
402:
325:
306:
287:
236:
235:
221:
173:
161:
143:
81:
63:
60:
34:
586:
585:
581:
580:
579:
577:
576:
575:
574:
568:deletion review
467:about his work
436:reliable source
381:
321:
302:
283:
178:
169:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
61:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
584:
582:
573:
572:
554:
553:
532:
522:Dom from Paris
515:
494:
493:
492:
491:
469:as a filmmaker
456:in the context
450:him by people
378:
332:
331:
312:
293:
239:
238:
175:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
583:
571:
569:
565:
561:
556:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
514:
510:
506:
503:
499:
496:
495:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
329:
326:
324:
318:
313:
310:
307:
305:
299:
294:
291:
288:
286:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
247:
243:
234:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
180:Find sources:
176:
172:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
559:
557:
543:Jovanmilic97
534:
517:
497:
476:
472:
468:
464:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:coverage in
431:
409:MatthewFayer
404:
392:MatthewFayer
390:
386:
382:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
342:MatthewFayer
336:— Preceding
333:
323:CAPTAIN RAJU
322:
304:CAPTAIN RAJU
303:
285:CAPTAIN RAJU
284:
258:
254:
240:
228:
222:
214:
207:
201:
195:
189:
179:
166:
120:Eddie Zajdel
77:
72:Eddie Zajdel
49:
47:
31:
28:
502:WP:Too soon
205:free images
62:SandDoctor
564:talk page
444:editorial
37:talk page
566:or in a
505:Rmhermen
477:anywhere
446:content
417:contribs
350:contribs
338:unsigned
164:View log
105:glossary
54:too soon
39:or in a
481:Bearcat
263:Bearcat
259:context
211:WP refs
199:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
539:WP:GNG
535:Delete
518:Delete
498:Delete
460:cannot
255:at all
242:WP:BLP
183:Google
141:delete
50:delete
452:other
448:about
440:media
226:JSTOR
187:books
171:Stats
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
547:talk
526:talk
509:talk
485:talk
432:must
413:talk
396:talk
346:talk
267:talk
246:IMDb
219:FENS
193:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
473:not
434:be
421:AfD
233:TWL
162:– (
59:The
549:)
528:)
511:)
500:.
487:)
423:.
415:•
407::
403:—
398:)
352:)
348:•
319:.
300:.
281:.
269:)
261:.
213:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
545:(
524:(
507:(
483:(
411:(
394:(
344:(
265:(
237:)
229:·
223:·
215:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
185:(
177:(
174:)
167:·
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.