657:
per Atsme. WBG, that's specifically per Atsme, for they added the NYT article which is as usual for an NYT full article, is proof of notability. But you are right that the university material is also PR. The fact that an article has a PR link is does not make it non-notable , if it has good
547:). And I don't feel like I've exhausted the searches -- just got to enough to satisfy me. All of this said, the article definitely needs work. It has a ton of detail based on scant secondary sources. It should be seriously cut back/reworked. —
499:. Also, academic article, wot?!Anybody who has got anything to do with academia, knows universities typically publish congratulatory pieces for any and all awards, won by their faculties/students/staff. Also, independent sources are needed.
215:
271:
168:
529:
291:
209:
424:- I understand why WBG nominated it for AfD - as it sits, the article cites no independent RS, and is heavily dependent on its own SPS which is a no-no. I found
100:
115:
319:
175:
141:
136:
145:
128:
658:
references also. It does need to be cut back a little--the lists of fellows don't seem appropriate, as they none of them seem notable yet.
525:
425:
323:
634:
article that
Lightburst and Atsme found plus the variety of articles that Rhododendrites found are adequate to establish notability.
230:
95:
88:
17:
616:
605:
would have seemed better to me, but given your ¡vote, can you tell me about which part of my rebut to Atsme, you do not agree with?
510:
406:
354:
261:
68:
197:
533:
537:
109:
105:
606:
500:
396:
344:
251:
191:
58:
686:
40:
669:
647:
618:
593:
573:
556:
512:
482:
457:
433:
408:
382:
356:
334:
303:
283:
263:
132:
70:
187:
541:
528:, but some additional digging returns coverage in several countries, including pieces about recipients, e.g. in
343:
The second source self-describes to be a Press-release and CVs are always bloated. Better efforts, please .....
545:
314:
appears to be a quite notable fellowship which has a recipient list that reads like a who is who in politics.
237:
454:
444:, perhaps it would help if you improved the article by citing the many RS that support the article content?
124:
76:
682:
36:
543:
437:
569:
478:
378:
330:
203:
640:
549:
299:
279:
223:
470:
429:
392:
370:
366:
315:
84:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
681:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
247:
565:
474:
448:
441:
374:
326:
635:
589:
295:
275:
496:
665:
365:
A press release describing a notable recipient of a notable award. There is SIGCOV
162:
428:
NYTimes article which helps to establish WP:N on a historic level. It also has a
469:, makes sense. Sometimes I do not have time so I just do an RS check to see if
582:
488:
445:
585:
660:
473:. So if I get to it, I will add to the article. It is a good practice!
487:
I have no clue what WorldScholarshipForum is but I am sure that's
564:, notable as notable can be and still be named after Eisenhower.
540:), and events like the one in Rwanda, covered by the New Times (
677:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
391:
You are and are now arguing that press-releases contribute to
495:. Press-releases never ever qualify as a source, except for
158:
154:
150:
222:
236:
532:(Spain), about group projects/events (e.g. in the
272:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
292:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
689:). No further edits should be made to this page.
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
270:Note: This discussion has been included in the
250:. PR spam and all that; non-notable fellowship
491:.The Yahoo piece is published from a feed of
8:
116:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
52:. No point in wasting time. Nom withdrawn.
369:but I honestly do not have time to do the
289:
269:
524:- I was on the fence after seeing that
432:academic scholarship reach that can be
436:and numerous academic articles about
373:that the nominator should have done.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
440:, so yes, it easily passes GNG.
101:Introduction to deletion process
1:
670:21:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
648:21:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
619:20:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
594:20:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
574:19:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
557:17:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
513:16:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
483:16:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
458:16:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
409:15:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
383:14:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
357:10:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
335:18:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
304:16:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
284:16:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
264:16:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
71:03:36, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
91:(AfD)? Read these primers!
706:
679:Please do not modify it.
316:US. Secretary of Defense
32:Please do not modify it.
125:Eisenhower Fellowships
77:Eisenhower Fellowships
322:, Also covered in RS
89:Articles for deletion
320:Senator John McCain
55:(non-admin closure)
603:Per Rhododendrites
451:
306:
286:
106:Guide to deletion
96:How to contribute
57:
697:
645:
643:Let's discuss it
614:
609:
554:
552:
508:
503:
449:
404:
399:
352:
347:
259:
254:
241:
240:
226:
178:
166:
148:
86:
66:
61:
53:
34:
705:
704:
700:
699:
698:
696:
695:
694:
693:
687:deletion review
641:
610:
607:
550:
548:
504:
501:
453:
400:
397:
348:
345:
255:
252:
183:
174:
139:
123:
120:
83:
80:
62:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
703:
701:
692:
691:
673:
672:
651:
650:
632:New York Times
624:
623:
622:
621:
597:
596:
576:
559:
551:Rhododendrites
538:New York Times
518:
517:
516:
515:
485:
461:
460:
447:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
386:
385:
360:
359:
338:
337:
324:New York Times
308:
307:
287:
244:
243:
180:
119:
118:
113:
103:
98:
81:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
702:
690:
688:
684:
680:
675:
674:
671:
667:
663:
662:
656:
653:
652:
649:
646:
644:
639:
638:
633:
629:
626:
625:
620:
617:
615:
613:
604:
601:
600:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
584:
580:
577:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
558:
553:
546:
544:
542:
539:
535:
531:
530:La Vanguardia
527:
523:
520:
519:
514:
511:
509:
507:
498:
494:
490:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
456:
452:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
419:
410:
407:
405:
403:
394:
390:
389:
388:
387:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
362:
361:
358:
355:
353:
351:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
262:
260:
258:
249:
239:
235:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
189:
186:
185:Find sources:
181:
177:
173:
170:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
143:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
117:
114:
111:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
93:
92:
90:
85:
78:
75:
73:
72:
69:
67:
65:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
678:
676:
659:
654:
642:
636:
631:
627:
611:
602:
578:
561:
521:
505:
492:
467:Thanks Atsme
466:
421:
401:
349:
311:
256:
245:
233:
227:
219:
212:
206:
200:
194:
184:
171:
82:
63:
49:
47:
31:
28:
534:Irish Times
526:NYT article
210:free images
50:speedy keep
566:Randy Kryn
493:PRNewsWire
475:Lightburst
442:Lightburst
438:recipients
375:Lightburst
327:Lightburst
683:talk page
630:The 1984
471:WP:NEXIST
393:WP:SIGCOV
371:WP:BEFORE
367:WP:NEXIST
296:Shellwood
276:Shellwood
37:talk page
685:or in a
489:not a RS
395:. Sigh.
169:View log
110:glossary
39:or in a
216:WP refs
204:scholar
142:protect
137:history
87:New to
637:Cullen
586:— Ched
430:global
248:WP:GNG
246:Fails
188:Google
146:delete
666:talk
655:Keep.
583:Atsme
434:cited
231:JSTOR
192:books
176:Stats
163:views
155:watch
151:links
16:<
628:Keep
590:talk
581:per
579:Keep
570:talk
562:Keep
522:Keep
497:WP:V
479:talk
450:Talk
426:this
422:Keep
379:talk
331:talk
312:Keep
300:talk
280:talk
224:FENS
198:news
159:logs
133:talk
129:edit
661:DGG
612:WBG
555:\\
536:or
506:WBG
402:WBG
350:WBG
257:WBG
238:TWL
167:– (
64:WBG
668:)
592:)
572:)
481:)
455:📧
381:)
333:)
318:,
302:)
294:.
282:)
274:.
218:)
161:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
664:(
608:∯
588:(
568:(
502:∯
477:(
398:∯
377:(
346:∯
329:(
298:(
278:(
253:∯
242:)
234:·
228:·
220:·
213:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
190:(
182:(
179:)
172:·
165:)
127:(
112:)
108:(
60:∯
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.