Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Electromagnetic Vector Sensor - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

258:
returns 18 journal articles from 1995 to 2009. WoS is a dedicated engine and having more than a few journal article hits there suggests notability. The article is poorly formatted, but that is usual for WP newcomers. WP:OR - doesn't seem to me; Cleanup needed - yes; promotion of Wong - yes, but the
236:
This article is not written at an appropriate level for Knowledge (XXG), but the topic is covered in hundreds of academic publications, and the article provides a bunch of relevant references. Could undoubtedly be improved a lot but I don't feel that it needs to be deleted.
151: 259:
cleanup will sort this out by chopping his refs. I don't see enough reasons for deletion. A word of a specialist in this area would be helpful. Who would be willing to cleanup is a good question.
145: 112: 190:
than encyclopedia article, and it is not documented how the long list of references is supposed to demonstrate notability of the concept. A previous instance of the article,
85: 80: 89: 72: 166: 133: 17: 315: 288: 268: 246: 228: 203: 127: 54: 123: 76: 330: 36: 264: 173: 191: 68: 60: 194:, was speedily deleted as blatant advertisement, but I would like to get the community's opinions on this issue. 329:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
221: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
279:. A number of the references to his own articles as well as the external link to his website are now gone. 139: 260: 311: 216: 159: 284: 242: 199: 303: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
186:
academic publications, complete with an external link to his website. The tone is more like
307: 210: 187: 255: 280: 238: 195: 106: 50: 183: 276:. Looks like the author paid attention to the constructive criticism: 323:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:. Search for "Electromagnetic Vector Sensor" (exact phrase) on 304:
http://www.eie.polyu.edu.hk/~enktwong/ktw/WongKT_AEST0401.pdf
213:, reads just like a research paper of dubious origin anyway. 277: 102: 98: 94: 158: 300:
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
298:- blatant copyvio: article is a straight paste from 302:April 2001, a scan of which can be downloaded from 172: 182:This article looks suspiciously like promotion of 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 333:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 209:Delete. Agree with nom here. Pretty clear 306:, copyrighted article by K. T. Wong. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 192:Electromagnetic vector sensor 69:Electromagnetic Vector Sensor 61:Electromagnetic Vector Sensor 316:13:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 289:08:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 269:01:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 247:17:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC) 229:14:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC) 204:12:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC) 55:10:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC) 350: 326:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:. Marked as a copyvio. 44:The result was 261:Materialscientist 188:original research 341: 328: 224: 219: 177: 176: 162: 110: 92: 34: 349: 348: 344: 343: 342: 340: 339: 338: 337: 331:deletion review 324: 222: 217: 119: 83: 67: 64: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 347: 345: 336: 335: 319: 318: 293: 292: 291: 256:Web of Science 249: 231: 226: 180: 179: 116: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 346: 334: 332: 327: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296:Speedy delete 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 275: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 257: 253: 250: 248: 244: 240: 235: 232: 230: 227: 225: 220: 215: 212: 208: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 175: 171: 168: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 125: 122: 121:Find sources: 117: 114: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 325: 322: 299: 295: 273: 251: 233: 214: 184:K. T. Wong's 181: 169: 163: 155: 148: 142: 136: 130: 120: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 308:MuffledThud 146:free images 223:Weatherman 252:Weak keep 281:Favonian 239:Looie496 196:Favonian 113:View log 274:Comment 152:WP refs 140:scholar 86:protect 81:history 124:Google 90:delete 46:delete 211:WP:OR 167:JSTOR 128:books 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 312:talk 285:talk 265:talk 243:talk 234:Keep 218:Athe 200:talk 160:FENS 134:news 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 51:Tone 174:TWL 111:– ( 314:) 287:) 267:) 245:) 202:) 154:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 310:( 283:( 263:( 241:( 198:( 178:) 170:· 164:· 156:· 149:· 143:· 137:· 131:· 126:( 118:( 115:) 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Tone
10:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Electromagnetic Vector Sensor
Electromagnetic Vector Sensor
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
K. T. Wong's
original research
Electromagnetic vector sensor
Favonian
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.