153:
243:
as argued and in addition, the basic physics is all wrong (cell phones, microwaves etc do not have a frequency of 50-60 Hz), no sources, no sources possible, random collection of prejudices, OR, POV etc etc.
213:
there is no source given to indicate "Electromagnetic frequency pollution" is the correct term to use for the subject matter; indeed, that title seems more suitable for an article related to
147:
83:
78:
87:
70:
110:
219:
the article has no sources and presents a very controversial and uncertain field of study as if harmful effect of power-line frequency fields were an established fact.
114:
359:
in New
Zealand. For a 'mere' $ 249 I can get "a stunning, easy to wear EMF protective pendant" that also "Balances the energy centers of the body (chakras)."!!
210:, and that article does not yet contain sufficient information about the health effects of power-line frequency fields to justify a separate article
168:
278:. The topic is important and is valid to some degree, but, it is sensitive and one may not speculate on it in a way it is done in this article.
135:
326:
article. States 50/60 Hz "makes the related electromagnetic radiation (EMR) harmful to us.", without scientific support. In fact
References #1
323:
296:
207:
362:
335:
370:
343:
314:
287:
270:
253:
228:
193:
52:
129:
125:
17:
74:
175:
199:
66:
58:
309:
214:
283:
388:
141:
36:
387:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
184:
It is a fork, does not have the right title, no sources, and states controversial ideas as established facts
366:
339:
334:(which appear to be the only reliable/science based sources given) appear to debunk the editors claims. --
279:
249:
161:
327:
331:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
304:
266:
245:
224:
189:
355:
rubbish being put out about "Electromagnetic frequency pollution" follow this link to
352:
104:
300:
262:
220:
185:
49:
356:
381:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100:
96:
92:
160:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:). No further edits should be made to this page.
202:should be deleted for the following reasons:
174:
8:
7:
324:Electromagnetic radiation and health
297:Electromagnetic radiation and health
208:Electromagnetic radiation and health
322:Area should be covered in existing
200:Electromagnetic frequency pollution
67:Electromagnetic frequency pollution
59:Electromagnetic frequency pollution
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
371:18:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
344:05:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
315:07:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
288:23:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
254:00:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
53:15:33, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
271:23:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
229:23:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
215:Radio frequency interference
194:23:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
408:
384:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
357:"Life Energy Solutions"
351:If you want to see the
332:Health Physics Society
44:The result was
313:
280:Materialscientist
399:
386:
307:
295:and redirect to
206:it is a fork of
179:
178:
164:
108:
90:
34:
407:
406:
402:
401:
400:
398:
397:
396:
395:
389:deletion review
382:
237:
121:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
405:
403:
394:
393:
377:
376:
375:
374:
317:
290:
273:
256:
236:
233:
232:
231:
217:
211:
182:
181:
118:
115:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
404:
392:
390:
385:
379:
378:
373:
372:
368:
364:
363:220.101.28.25
358:
354:
353:Pseudoscience
350:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
336:220.101.28.25
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
311:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
261:as nominator
260:
257:
255:
251:
247:
242:
239:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
216:
212:
209:
205:
204:
203:
201:
196:
195:
191:
187:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
119:
116:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
383:
380:
360:
348:
319:
292:
275:
258:
240:
198:The article
197:
183:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
45:
43:
31:
28:
301:Electrosmog
246:Sussexonian
148:free images
235:Discussion
299:to match
349:Comment:
111:View log
330:and #3
320:Delete:
154:WP refs
142:scholar
84:protect
79:history
293:Delete
276:Delete
263:Jc3s5h
259:Delete
241:Delete
221:Jc3s5h
186:Jc3s5h
126:Google
88:delete
50:Secret
46:delete
310:cont.
169:JSTOR
130:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
367:talk
340:talk
303:. -
284:talk
267:talk
250:talk
225:talk
190:talk
162:FENS
136:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
328:WHO
305:2/0
176:TWL
113:•
109:– (
369:)
361:--
342:)
286:)
269:)
252:)
227:)
192:)
156:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
365:(
338:(
312:)
308:(
282:(
265:(
248:(
223:(
188:(
180:)
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
120:(
117:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.