152:
5) With this new wave of editors came new determination to keep people who want EVP to be factually represented from participating in consensus building. One of the arguments for why I could not edit the entry was that there are references to the AA-EVP, making it a conflict of interest. My solution
156:
Based on
Knowledge (XXG) rules and the evidence of the EVP talk pages, it is clear that EVP should not be in the encyclopedia because it is not possible to arrive at and maintain a consensus. Determination to have the EVP entry has already produced negative publicity for Knowledge (XXG), which will
144:
3) It has been demonstrated on numerous occasions that many of the editors contributing to the EVP entry do not have the background in the subject to distinguish valid information from out-dated or simply erronious information. Exclusion of EVP subject matter experts assures this to be a continuing
148:
4) There has been a continuing conflect between people who want demonstrated fact to be presented and people who discount those facts as not demonstrated by mainstream science. Even when agreement between the two vieupoints has been reached, it is sometimes only a few hours before new conservative
136:
1) Knowledge (XXG) rules restrict content of the EVP entry: Knowledge (XXG):No original research. Virtually all of the work done to study EVP and related phenomena has been classified by editors as original research, and therefore, the subject cannot be factually represented in
Knowledge (XXG).
140:
2) A survey of the people studying EVP, and therefore the people who are sufficiently knowledgable to provide factual content , will show that virtually all of them have a conflict of interested as described by
Knowledge (XXG) editors: Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest.
153:
was to remove those references, but in response, I was blocked from editing for "editing wars." At the same time, one of the new editors was in an edit war over tages, but nothing was done to correct this.
149:
editors begin pushing the point of view to make EVP sound like we are delusional. When I firs tcame to it last
Novemeber, the AA-EVP, and therefore EVP was being discounted because I am a Spiritualsit.
175:
116:
89:
84:
93:
76:
17:
80:
230:
213:
189:
161:
127:
58:
184:
245:
36:
72:
64:
244:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
179:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
205:
54:
198:
171:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
202:
226:
158:
124:
221:
this is a real, verifiable topic, regardless of whether it can be proven "for real".
157:
only eculate while EVP remains a public contest between skeptic and "proponents."
110:
222:
178:. The user seems frustrated at not getting his way with the article. --
238:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
130:
I have submitted EVP for deletion. I will follow with ITC.
106:
102:
98:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
133:The reason for this request for deletion is that:
248:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
176:WP:ANI/#Electronic_voice_phenomenon
24:
1:
231:00:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
214:00:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
190:00:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
162:00:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
128:00:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
59:00:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
73:Electronic voice phenomenon
65:Electronic voice phenomenon
265:
241:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:(non-admin closure),
180:Consumed Crustacean
188:
256:
243:
211:
208:
201:nomination from
182:
174:nomination. See
114:
96:
34:
264:
263:
259:
258:
257:
255:
254:
253:
252:
246:deletion review
239:
209:
206:
87:
71:
68:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
262:
260:
251:
250:
234:
233:
216:
192:
121:
120:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
261:
249:
247:
242:
236:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:Postlethwaite
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
186:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
131:
129:
126:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
240:
237:
218:
194:
167:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
122:
53:
52:nomination.
45:
43:
31:
28:
195:Speedy keep
168:Speedy keep
46:speedy keep
159:Tom Butler
125:Tom Butler
55:Yuser31415
145:problem.
199:WP:POINT
172:WP:POINT
117:View log
50:WP:POINT
203:WP:AN/I
123:Reason
90:protect
85:history
94:delete
223:IPSOS
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
227:talk
219:Keep
207:Ryan
197:per
185:talk
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
115:- (
229:)
170:.
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
225:(
187:)
183:(
119:)
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.