Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Cascio - Knowledge

Source 📝

336:
is far more than is typical for our field). She has also won a minor prize (the Labour Economics Best Reviewer Award, 2014), and her work is frequently cited in publications such as The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Economist, and The Wall Street Journal. I would also like to point out that
451:
C1. Although this nomination is not as much of a snow keep as the previous batch on the academic AfD section, the keep case looks solid: several highly cited papers in a medium-to-low citation field, with a high total citation number. I'll point out on the minus side that she is an associate
366:
Indeed, there is not: this is another in a string of highly questionable nominations of female academics and economists (targeting, among others, a named chair at Harvard and a Fellow of the Royal Academy) that shows a startling disinterest in
206: 550:. And suggest to BeenAroundAWhile that continuing to focus on nominating notable academic women for deletion (this is one of four, apparently the first although I noticed it last; the other three are 424: 436: 415: 304: 555: 452:
professor, which in the past has made us look a bit more carefully. I share concerns others express about the pointed-appearing nomination for deletion of female academics.
159: 200: 279: 254: 559: 470: 551: 106: 91: 333: 402: 166: 132: 127: 400: 136: 398: 119: 221: 86: 79: 17: 188: 100: 96: 242: 182: 606: 40: 567: 457: 589: 571: 537: 512: 482: 461: 385: 358: 321: 296: 271: 246: 61: 178: 404: 57: 602: 432: 411: 238: 228: 123: 36: 332:
I started the page. As a professional economist myself, I believe Cascio's work has been influential (
533: 376: 563: 453: 214: 478: 53: 237:
She has won no awards nor done anything of notice beyond what is expected of a working scholar.
194: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
601:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
582: 428: 407: 368: 115: 67: 529: 448: 547: 521: 507: 494: 394: 372: 354: 346: 338: 314: 289: 264: 474: 528:
reservation is the great bloat of this BLP about a not yet very prominent subject.
501:
of 20. GNG is more marginal but is not required to be met because she passes PROF.
153: 397:. In addition to the references already present, other secondary sources like 504: 350: 342: 309: 284: 259: 498: 371:, if not outright bad faith, several which have already closed as 546:. Six publications with 100 citations each is easily enough for 597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
425:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
149: 145: 141: 337:
there is no such deletion proposal for her colleague,
213: 562:) is likely to raise suspicion of biased editing. — 305:list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 609:). No further edits should be made to this page. 469:Note: This discussion has been included in the 423:Note: This discussion has been included in the 303:Note: This discussion has been included in the 278:Note: This discussion has been included in the 253:Note: This discussion has been included in the 280:list of California-related deletion discussions 349:) 14:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC), modified at -- 255:list of Economics-related deletion discussions 227: 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 471:list of Women-related deletion discussions 468: 422: 302: 277: 252: 341:, who has had a very similar career.-- 7: 579:. Reasonably decent h-index value. 24: 334:1800 citations in Google Scholar 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 590:12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 572:07:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 538:03:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 513:22:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 483:18:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 462:18:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 437:17:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 416:17:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 406:could potentially be added. 386:16:45, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 359:16:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 322:03:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 297:03:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 272:03:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 247:03:36, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 62:09:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 626: 599:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 80:Articles for deletion 485: 439: 324: 299: 274: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 617: 587: 585: 510: 382: 317: 312: 292: 287: 267: 262: 239:BeenAroundAWhile 232: 231: 217: 169: 157: 139: 116:Elizabeth Cascio 77: 68:Elizabeth Cascio 34: 625: 624: 620: 619: 618: 616: 615: 614: 613: 607:deletion review 583: 581: 503: 378: 315: 310: 290: 285: 265: 260: 174: 165: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 623: 621: 612: 611: 593: 592: 574: 564:David Eppstein 541: 520:. Just passes 515: 487: 486: 465: 464: 454:Russ Woodroofe 441: 440: 419: 418: 388: 361: 339:Ethan G. Lewis 326: 325: 300: 275: 235: 234: 171: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 622: 610: 608: 604: 600: 595: 594: 591: 588: 586: 578: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 542: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 516: 514: 511: 509: 506: 500: 496: 492: 489: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 467: 466: 463: 459: 455: 450: 446: 443: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 403: 401: 399: 396: 392: 389: 387: 384: 383: 381: 374: 370: 365: 362: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 331: 328: 327: 323: 319: 318: 313: 306: 301: 298: 294: 293: 288: 281: 276: 273: 269: 268: 263: 256: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 168: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 54:Jo-Jo Eumerus 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 598: 596: 580: 576: 543: 525: 518:Weakish keep 517: 502: 490: 444: 390: 379: 377: 364:Speedy Keep: 363: 329: 308: 283: 258: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 162: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 584:scope_creep 380:Ravenswing 201:free images 530:Xxanthippe 524:. My only 493:as passes 429:XOR'easter 408:XOR'easter 395:WP:PROF#C1 373:snow keeps 603:talk page 526:complaint 495:WP:PROF#1 369:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 605:or in a 497:with an 475:TJMSmith 449:WP:NPROF 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 548:WP:PROF 522:WP:Prof 499:h-index 393:Passes 207:WP refs 195:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 179:Google 137:delete 330:Keep. 320:, at 295:, at 270:, at 222:JSTOR 183:books 167:Stats 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 577:Keep 568:talk 544:Keep 534:talk 491:Keep 479:talk 458:talk 447:for 445:Keep 433:talk 412:talk 391:Keep 355:talk 351:EAWH 347:talk 343:EAWH 243:talk 215:FENS 189:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 50:keep 508:947 316:947 291:947 266:947 229:TWL 158:– ( 570:) 558:, 554:, 536:) 481:) 473:. 460:) 435:) 427:. 414:) 375:. 357:) 307:. 282:. 257:. 245:) 209:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 566:( 560:3 556:2 552:1 540:. 532:( 505:J 477:( 456:( 431:( 410:( 353:( 345:( 311:J 286:J 261:J 241:( 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 163:· 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Jo-Jo Eumerus
talk
09:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Elizabeth Cascio

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Elizabeth Cascio
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.