129:
enough for inclusion. It is not sourced, and the information here cannot be verified. The term receives no Google-hits. It may be something made up one day, or may simply be vandalism.
118:
85:
80:
89:
72:
17:
152:
36:
151:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
138:
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
134:
76:
68:
60:
130:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
106:
126:
145:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
102:
98:
94:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
155:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
139:04:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
55:05:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
172:
148:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:by Fuhghettaboutit.
44:The result was
69:Epic Reverse Dump
61:Epic Reverse Dump
163:
150:
125:This may not be
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
171:
170:
166:
165:
164:
162:
161:
160:
159:
153:deletion review
146:
112:
83:
67:
64:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
169:
167:
158:
157:
131:Richard Cavell
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
168:
156:
154:
149:
143:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
46:Speedy Delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
147:
144:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
119:View log
51:Lenticel
127:notable
86:protect
81:history
114:delete
90:delete
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
135:talk
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
137:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
133:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.