536:. This app might have been notable, but the article could use some more information and better sourcing. Two of the four references in the article are broken URLs, the app's official site appears to be defunct, the app is no longer available in the Google Play store as far as I can tell, and there have been no posts to the Erodr Facebook or Twitter pages for more than a year. If the app is defunct, when did it go defunct, and if it is still active, what evidence is there of that? --
343:
Just because something is no longer considered "notable" now does not prevent it from having a
Knowledge article. In fact, just the opposite. Knowledge is one of the most major ways by which future generations can learn about the past, i.e. what was TRENDY and NOTABLE back then, and so on. If we
287:- if it was sufficiently notable while in use, it remains notable now. So any arguments for deletion would have to be based on there never having been enough coverage in the first place. Do you posit that is the case? To my eyes, what's there is not particularly strong but it should do. --
238:
I wrote this article. This social network has been dead for several years with no news outlets noting its passing. This app was huge in its day, make no mistake, but the lack of media coverage makes this non-notable in the
Knowledge sense.
344:
delete this article and others on the grounds that it is no longer significant enough, then we are losing history! It would be like the Great Fire of
Alexandria. And I should know; history is my college major!
207:
160:
260:
201:
107:
92:
241:
This app's founder bailed or no-showed on me more times than I can count when I tried to write up this company in the college newspaper
167:
60:
87:
80:
17:
363:
The fact that it is done now doesn't make it worthy to delete. Looks well enough sourced, especially with that Vox article.
52:. Essentially, the comments refuting the nominator have been from sockpuppets (and hence struck), and one neutral comment.
299:
492:
432:
403:
326:
248:
101:
97:
222:
505:
189:
560:
133:
128:
40:
540:
137:
488:
428:
399:
322:
244:
120:
556:
388:
368:
36:
183:
58:
537:
472:
268:
215:
179:
448:
349:
124:
543:
526:
496:
476:
452:
436:
407:
372:
353:
330:
304:
272:
252:
62:
295:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
555:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
229:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
420:
416:
384:
364:
116:
68:
284:
53:
517:
468:
264:
444:
345:
321:
newspaper, and one national newspaper – fail to establish any national significance.
314:
289:
195:
154:
467:
To make a long story short, there are enough sources, and they are all reliable.
443:**So what? If it's a real magazine published by a real university, it can stay.
398:
Not sure what you mean. This article has not been edited since I nominated it.
318:
427:
you are thinking of. That's a minor magazine of the
University of Missouri.
487:- Comments from the three sockpuppets above have been stricken.
551:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
424:
508:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
317:. The chosen sources – two college media, one regional
150:
146:
142:
214:
514:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
563:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:There are no longer any problems with sourcing.
259:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:list of Software-related deletion discussions
228:
8:
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
258:
423:. To be clear, that's probably not the
7:
313:I don't think this article ever met
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
497:02:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
477:23:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
453:23:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
437:22:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
408:21:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
373:21:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
354:23:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
331:02:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
305:20:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
273:08:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
253:06:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
544:18:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
527:12:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
63:16:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
285:notability is not temporary
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
580:
553:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
81:Articles for deletion
479:
461:
458:
455:
392:
356:
283:Well, technically
529:
525:
489:Mark Schierbecker
463:
460:
457:
442:
429:Mark Schierbecker
400:Mark Schierbecker
378:
338:
323:Mark Schierbecker
303:
275:
245:Mark Schierbecker
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
571:
524:
522:
515:
513:
511:
509:
421:User:JohaNepomuk
417:User:Bluedude588
293:
292:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
579:
578:
574:
573:
572:
570:
569:
568:
567:
561:deletion review
530:
518:
516:
504:
502:
288:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
577:
575:
566:
565:
547:
546:
538:Metropolitan90
512:
501:
500:
499:
481:
480:
440:
439:
413:
412:
411:
410:
376:
375:
336:
335:
334:
333:
308:
307:
277:
276:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
576:
564:
562:
558:
554:
549:
548:
545:
542:
539:
535:
532:
531:
528:
523:
521:
510:
507:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
456:
454:
450:
446:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
357:
355:
351:
347:
342:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
309:
306:
301:
297:
291:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
552:
550:
533:
519:
503:
484:
464:
441:
380:
377:
360:
340:
337:
280:
240:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
385:JohaNepomuk
365:Bluedude588
319:booster-ish
202:free images
520:Sandstein
55:Ritchie333
557:talk page
469:LizzyPiez
265:Shellwood
37:talk page
559:or in a
506:Relisted
445:JoeLeboe
346:JoeLeboe
300:contribs
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
534:Comment
485:Comment
341:Agreed.
290:Elmidae
281:Comment
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
541:(talk)
315:WP:GNG
180:Google
138:delete
50:delete
465:Keep.
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
117:Erodr
69:Erodr
16:<
493:talk
473:talk
449:talk
433:talk
404:talk
389:talk
381:Keep
369:talk
361:Keep
350:talk
327:talk
296:talk
269:talk
249:talk
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
425:Vox
243:).
230:TWL
159:– (
495:)
475:)
451:)
435:)
419:,
406:)
391:)
371:)
352:)
339:**
329:)
298:·
271:)
263:.
251:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
491:(
471:(
447:(
431:(
402:(
387:(
379:*
367:(
348:(
325:(
302:)
294:(
267:(
247:(
239:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.