312:- an explanation given by nominator surely contains a bit of contradictory claim, where "accomplished" academic, which Kurtović certainly is, both accomplished and very prominent in his own academic environment, somehow fails to meet aforementioned WP:NACADEMIC. Also postulated in edit-summary is my belief that Google Scholar citation count is not decisive criteria for inclusion on Knowledge, as such would render too many prominent scholars working in small and very small, especially non-English language, academic milieus and in a fields and subjects of exclusively local significance and on specific topics, unfairly omitted from the project - Kurtović is very prominent Medievalist in Balkan and in particular Bosnian-Herzegovinian context, so I am sorry but I can't agree with this nomination and I feel that I need to contest it. As for "anemic" references, well, that was never the reason for article deletion, even when lacking completely we deal with that issue with template messages, unless article is obviously failing on notability.--
330:
Seems to be notable if he wrote a three-book volume on the subject and has an
Authority Control listing, which means he's been indexed in worldwide libraries. However, the article has a list of over 60 publications/articles/whatever they are, without telling much about the author. Would need a
300:- As I explained in edit-summary when removing prod template, and subsequently in TP, BLP article on academic E.Kurtović is very important in context of Bosnian historiography, so I really think that I have valid reason to contest this
197:
255:
277:
158:
191:
105:
90:
228:
Very accomplished, lots of published material, but very anemic citation count (highest is 35). Can't see where he meets any of the other criteria of
131:
126:
135:
118:
212:
179:
85:
78:
17:
331:
rewrite to be kept. Would be best to delete and start over with better sources, not simply provide a rambling list of items.
99:
95:
173:
348:
Definitely notable through his publications and accomplishments, even though there are many improvements needed.--
395:
40:
378:
357:
340:
322:
304:
nomination. Beside the argument postulated in my edit-summary, I also do not see violation of criteria given in
289:
269:
247:
60:
169:
353:
219:
391:
36:
122:
336:
320:
309:
285:
229:
205:
185:
349:
74:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
390:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
114:
66:
373:
332:
313:
281:
305:
259:
237:
233:
152:
367:
386:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
256:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
278:
list of Bosnia and
Herzegovina-related deletion discussions
148:
144:
140:
204:
365:He has several notable works in his bibliography.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:). No further edits should be made to this page.
276:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:Note: This discussion has been included in the
218:
8:
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
275:
253:
7:
24:
91:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
232:, and definitely doesn't meet
1:
379:17:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
358:21:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
341:03:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
323:20:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
290:19:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
270:19:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
248:19:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
61:16:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
415:
388:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
79:Articles for deletion
308:and especially in
292:
272:
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
406:
376:
370:
318:
266:
263:
244:
241:
223:
222:
208:
156:
138:
76:
57:
34:
414:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
396:deletion review
375:(talk is cheap)
374:
368:
314:
264:
261:
242:
239:
165:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
55:
52:. Best Wishes,
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
412:
410:
401:
400:
382:
381:
360:
343:
325:
294:
293:
273:
226:
225:
162:
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
411:
399:
397:
393:
389:
384:
383:
380:
377:
372:
371:
364:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
324:
321:
319:
317:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
271:
268:
267:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
245:
235:
231:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
171:
168:
167:Find sources:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:Esad Kurtović
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
67:Esad Kurtović
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
387:
385:
366:
362:
350:Seacactus 13
345:
327:
315:
310:WP:NACADEMIC
301:
297:
260:
238:
230:WP:NACADEMIC
227:
215:
209:
201:
194:
188:
182:
176:
166:
72:
56:Lee Vilenski
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
298:Strong keep
192:free images
392:talk page
363:Mild Keep
333:Oaktree b
328:Mild Keep
316:౪ Santa ౪
282:Shellwood
37:talk page
394:or in a
159:View log
100:glossary
39:or in a
198:WP refs
186:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
306:WP:GNG
234:WP:GNG
170:Google
136:delete
369:Sadkσ
213:JSTOR
174:books
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
354:talk
346:Keep
337:talk
302:PROD
286:talk
265:5969
262:Onel
243:5969
240:Onel
206:FENS
180:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
50:keep
220:TWL
157:– (
356:)
339:)
288:)
280:.
258:.
236:.
200:)
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
352:(
335:(
284:(
224:)
216:·
210:·
202:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
172:(
164:(
161:)
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.