380:: The two sources in the article are the magazine itself, and a source that doesn't mention the magazine (from the link or from a search). Andrew's sources per usual are not SIGCOV. The magazine did not win a gold medal, the Times of London did for their design, the article has a few comments from the judges, definitely not SIGCOV. The Google books again is about the Times of London design of the magzine with no SIGCOV about the actual subject - the magazine.
353:
seems very niche. The source is effectively a press release (an announcement from the SfND) and the organization page does not suggest it is even notable in the current state. The book seems more relevant, and there seem to be something on pages 92-96, which have a heading case study: eureka / the
240:
where the subject is mentioned (I'd do so myself but given the PROD was simply removed with no redirect I expect redirecting would be challenged, plus I dislike stealth deletion by redirecting w/ no discussion). And hey, maybe someone can dig up something I missed and rescue this as a stand-alone
193:
236:
did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or
Gscholar.". Prod was removed with no meaningful rationale, article has not been improved, so here we go. At best this could be redirected to
284:
187:
261:
154:
312:
127:
122:
101:
131:
86:
114:
225:
208:
358:. Anyway, I would say that the book is probably a good source, but the award, sourced to a press release, is niche and irrelevant.
175:
317:
81:
74:
17:
224:
I prodded this with "e coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
229:
439:
419:
393:
370:
341:
299:
276:
253:
169:
56:
402:
Coverage of the design of something is obviously coverage of the thing in question and so those sources are certainly
95:
91:
165:
118:
460:
415:
337:
40:
215:
110:
62:
350:
354:
times, but unless someone can get access and confirm there is substantive analysis, we are rather close to
52:. The keep argument does not reflect policy and the source analysis and delete arguments are compelling.
456:
388:
36:
424:
411:
355:
346:
333:
201:
181:
433:
364:
293:
270:
247:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
455:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
403:
384:
321:
233:
325:
429:
360:
330:
If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.
289:
266:
243:
53:
427:, The quotation would be more convincing if it wasn't sourced to a press release.
148:
237:
451:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
310:
The topic appears as a detailed case study in the book
144:
140:
136:
200:
316:
and won a gold medal for design, being described as "
285:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
260:Note: This discussion has been included in the
262:list of News media-related deletion discussions
214:
8:
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
406:. The quotation above makes this clear, "
282:
259:
320:". So, as usual, this is a failure of
226:Knowledge:General notability guideline
430:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
361:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
290:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
267:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
244:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
408:Maybe the best magazine in the world
318:Maybe the best magazine in the world
24:
87:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
238:The_Times#Related_publications
1:
230:Knowledge:Notability (media)
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
480:
440:02:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
420:21:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
394:13:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
371:02:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
57:06:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
342:10:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
300:03:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
277:03:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
254:03:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
453:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
351:Society for News Design
111:Eureka (Times magazine)
63:Eureka (Times magazine)
228:nor the more detailed
75:Articles for deletion
349:, The award from
302:
279:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
471:
436:
392:
367:
296:
273:
250:
219:
218:
204:
152:
134:
72:
34:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
469:
468:
467:
461:deletion review
438:
434:
425:Andrew Davidson
381:
369:
365:
347:Andrew Davidson
324:and our policy
298:
294:
275:
271:
252:
248:
161:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
477:
475:
466:
465:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
428:
397:
396:
375:
374:
373:
359:
313:Designing News
304:
303:
288:
280:
265:
242:
222:
221:
158:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
476:
464:
462:
458:
454:
449:
448:
441:
437:
431:
426:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
391:
390:
386:
379:
376:
372:
368:
362:
357:
356:WP:GOOGLEHITS
352:
348:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
309:
306:
305:
301:
297:
291:
286:
281:
278:
274:
268:
263:
258:
257:
256:
255:
251:
245:
239:
235:
232:requirement.
231:
227:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
452:
450:
407:
382:
377:
329:
311:
307:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
328:applies – "
188:free images
435:reply here
366:reply here
295:reply here
272:reply here
249:reply here
457:talk page
404:WP:SIGCOV
322:WP:BEFORE
234:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
459:or in a
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
385:Timothy
241:entry?
194:WP refs
182:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
412:Andrew
378:Delete
334:Andrew
326:WP:ATD
166:Google
132:delete
50:delete
209:JSTOR
170:books
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
416:talk
389:talk
338:talk
308:Keep
202:FENS
176:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
414:🐉(
410:".
387:::
383://
336:🐉(
216:TWL
153:– (
418:)
340:)
332:"
287:.
264:.
196:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
432:|
363:|
292:|
269:|
246:|
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.