Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/FLEUR - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

375:, with which it is typically cited gives more than 600 results of scientific publications. This is a relevant number in the field. The list of these codes and the articles on each code are used by students and researchers who want to work in the respective scientific field to get a first impression on what tools they can use for their investigations. In my opinion deleting an article on one of these codes would somehow imply that the article is special in some way. I don't see that for the article on FLEUR. If there are inappropriate statements in the article I would reformulate them or look for references if there is none backing the statement. As far as I see for the statements in the article on FLEUR there are references in terms of publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. I would like to understand the deletion nomination. Could you please clarify the thought? 448:
software projects that are in common use by many research groups and the option to combine them with the FLEUR code may be of interest to people interested in this wikipedia article. I guess at some point someone will write wikipedia articles on them. Before, I used the external links because that is how I saw references to these software packages in other wikipedia articles. I hope this resolves the external link problem in your sense.
522:
a wikipedia article is a different issue. I will look for a few publications, but that will take some time. Of course, some of the cited references in the wikipedia article are on methodological developments of the software. It is natural that you see people from the development group on such publications.
521:
I agree that it would be nice to add a few references on the usage of the code that are unrelated to the development group. Scrolling over the google scholar search list shows that there are many scientific articles that fall under this criterion. Finding nice examples that are not misplaced in such
549:
I now added two highly-cited references of work with FLEUR code usage that are unrelated to the development team. One is a Nature Nanotechnology publication on graphene and the other is a Nature Communications article on certain physics in topological insulators. According to Google Scholar one has
618:
Thank you all for the constructive feedback so far. I'm still pretty new in creating new Knowledge (XXG) articles. Your comments already gave me good instructions on what to care about in future articles and, of course, this article also already benefited from your feedback. I hope we can find a
465:
I just removed from the article a statement on the development of the code in the context of the European center of excellence MaX. Even though the statements were backed by references the wording may have sounded promotional. I think this already eliminates or at least reduces the case for the
403:
to primary sources and the official website, used as a way to get readers of the article to visit the website, which should really only ever be included in the infobox at the official website parameter or under the "External links" section of the article for informative purposes. External links
447:
Sorry, I wasn't aware of this external link guideline. I also didn't perceive this as a disguise. I now moved the link to the FLEUR code homepage to a new external links section and turned other external links into links to Knowledge (XXG) articles that still have to be written. These are all
598:
It's used in research that has been published in journals which are as good as we could ask for. While those papers don't go into depth on the details of the software itself, they do rely upon it in a significant way. I think there's enough to get it over the wiki-notability bar.
486:
This looks like a pretty ordinary article on a piece of scientific software. I'm not a fan of long feature lists (they do tend to read like the back of a software box, back in ye olden days when programs came in boxes), but that's a matter of style, not grounds for deletion. The
491:
looks pretty respectable, though not all of them are useful for our purposes; abstracts for conference presentations aren't really peer-reviewed publications, for example. I'd be inclined to keep if we had a few examples of the software being used by people other than
370:
Knowledge (XXG) has many articles on software projects similar to FLEUR. There are lists of such software projects linked in the article. Each article on such a software package describes the features of the respective code, just like the article on the FLEUR code. A
209: 575:, for example the software is extensively discussed in this white paper on FLAPW methods. or this German article, along with its extensive usage. In general, I think there needs to be a new criteria for 293: 170: 319: 345: 267: 655:: Open licensed software license in a seeming specialist scientific area which seems sustained over a large number of years now with some better sources identified. 608: 505: 203: 102: 117: 571:. Any promotional content/tone can be addressed on the talk page. I personally am not a huge fan either of the feature lists, but this passes 550:
more than 1000 citations, the other one more than 200. I think these are nice examples for the code usage. Is this enough or do we need more?
97: 90: 17: 427: 359: 333: 307: 281: 255: 68: 413: 559: 531: 488: 372: 111: 107: 764: 40: 400: 619:
consensus on keeping the article. Of course, I will also try to incorporate further feedback in a constructive way.
224: 399:
To clarify, along with the article being written like its an advertisement, the article has an abundancy of inline
191: 143: 138: 147: 721:"Ballistic transport in one-dimensional magnetic nanojunctions:A first-principles Wannier function approach" 660: 643: 130: 576: 405: 760: 728: 604: 501: 423: 355: 329: 303: 277: 251: 64: 36: 185: 620: 551: 523: 469: 449: 394: 378: 624: 584: 555: 527: 473: 453: 382: 217: 181: 656: 639: 700:
Davidović, Davor; Fabregat-Traver, Diego; Höhnerbach, Markus; di Napoli, Edoardo (2017-12-19).
681: 664: 647: 628: 588: 477: 457: 431: 386: 363: 337: 311: 285: 259: 72: 86: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
759:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
409: 241: 231: 54: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
600: 544: 516: 497: 442: 417: 349: 323: 297: 271: 245: 58: 572: 741: 240:
Promotionally-written article. Speedy deletion was declined but I believe this article is
720: 677: 580: 197: 579:
since it is a fine line between legitimate accreditation and promotional fanfare.
164: 702:"Accelerating the computation of FLAPW methods on heterogeneous architectures" 134: 673: 493: 701: 126: 78: 755:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
638:
this seems notable but it does need to be cleaned up a bit.
160: 156: 152: 216: 230: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 767:). No further edits should be made to this page. 412:, or that the person who created the article is 344:Note: This discussion has been included in the 318:Note: This discussion has been included in the 292:Note: This discussion has been included in the 266:Note: This discussion has been included in the 294:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 408:are usually an indication that the article is 320:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 346:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 268:list of Science-related deletion discussions 118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 373:google scholar search on the code's website 343: 317: 291: 265: 692: 737: 726: 414:associated with the product or company 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 672:, significant use in research.-- 103:Introduction to deletion process 1: 719:Hardrat, Björn (2012-11-28). 682:12:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC) 665:09:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC) 93:(AfD)? Read these primers! 73:18:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC) 784: 648:21:12, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 629:20:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 609:20:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 589:18:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 560:20:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 532:19:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 506:18:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 478:17:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 458:18:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 432:17:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 387:16:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 364:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 338:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 312:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 286:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 260:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC) 757:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 489:raw number of citations 736:Cite journal requires 91:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 706:arXiv:1712.07206 366: 340: 314: 288: 108:Guide to deletion 98:How to contribute 57: 775: 746: 745: 739: 734: 732: 724: 716: 710: 709: 697: 548: 520: 446: 398: 235: 234: 220: 168: 150: 88: 53: 34: 783: 782: 778: 777: 776: 774: 773: 772: 771: 765:deletion review 751: 750: 749: 735: 725: 718: 717: 713: 699: 698: 694: 542: 514: 440: 392: 177: 141: 125: 122: 85: 82: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 781: 779: 770: 769: 748: 747: 711: 691: 690: 686: 685: 684: 667: 650: 632: 631: 612: 611: 592: 591: 565: 564: 563: 562: 537: 536: 535: 534: 509: 508: 494:the developers 463: 462: 461: 460: 435: 434: 401:external links 368: 367: 341: 315: 289: 238: 237: 174: 121: 120: 115: 105: 100: 83: 81: 76: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 780: 768: 766: 762: 758: 753: 752: 743: 730: 722: 715: 712: 707: 703: 696: 693: 689: 683: 679: 675: 671: 668: 666: 662: 658: 657:Djm-leighpark 654: 651: 649: 645: 641: 640:BuySomeApples 637: 634: 633: 630: 626: 622: 617: 614: 613: 610: 606: 602: 597: 594: 593: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 567: 566: 561: 557: 553: 546: 541: 540: 539: 538: 533: 529: 525: 518: 513: 512: 511: 510: 507: 503: 499: 495: 490: 485: 482: 481: 480: 479: 475: 471: 467: 459: 455: 451: 444: 439: 438: 437: 436: 433: 429: 428:contributions 425: 421: 420: 415: 411: 407: 404:disguised as 402: 396: 391: 390: 389: 388: 384: 380: 376: 374: 365: 361: 360:contributions 357: 353: 352: 347: 342: 339: 335: 334:contributions 331: 327: 326: 321: 316: 313: 309: 308:contributions 305: 301: 300: 295: 290: 287: 283: 282:contributions 279: 275: 274: 269: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257: 256:contributions 253: 249: 248: 243: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179:Find sources: 175: 172: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 123: 119: 116: 113: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 95: 94: 92: 87: 80: 77: 75: 74: 70: 69:contributions 66: 62: 61: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 756: 754: 729:cite journal 714: 705: 695: 687: 669: 652: 635: 615: 595: 577:WP:NSOFTWARE 568: 483: 468: 464: 418: 377: 369: 350: 324: 298: 272: 246: 239: 227: 221: 213: 206: 200: 194: 188: 178: 84: 59: 49: 47: 31: 28: 443:WaddlesJP13 419:WaddlesJP13 351:WaddlesJP13 325:WaddlesJP13 299:WaddlesJP13 273:WaddlesJP13 247:WaddlesJP13 204:free images 60:WaddlesJP13 688:References 601:XOR'easter 583:(he/him • 545:XOR'easter 517:XOR'easter 498:XOR'easter 466:deletion. 761:talk page 738:|journal= 636:Weak keep 621:GreSebMic 581:Shushugah 552:GreSebMic 524:GreSebMic 470:GreSebMic 450:GreSebMic 406:Wikilinks 395:GreSebMic 379:GreSebMic 37:talk page 763:or in a 171:View log 112:glossary 39:or in a 616:Comment 484:Comment 242:WP:SPAM 210:WP refs 198:scholar 144:protect 139:history 89:New to 573:WP:GNG 182:Google 148:delete 225:JSTOR 186:books 165:views 157:watch 153:links 127:FLEUR 79:FLEUR 16:< 742:help 678:talk 674:Mvqr 670:Keep 661:talk 653:Keep 644:talk 625:talk 605:talk 596:Keep 585:talk 569:Keep 556:talk 528:talk 502:talk 474:talk 454:talk 424:talk 410:spam 383:talk 356:talk 330:talk 304:talk 278:talk 252:talk 218:FENS 192:news 161:logs 135:talk 131:edit 65:talk 50:keep 232:TWL 169:– ( 733:: 731:}} 727:{{ 704:. 680:) 663:) 646:) 627:) 607:) 587:) 558:) 530:) 504:) 496:. 476:) 456:) 430:) 426:| 416:. 385:) 362:) 358:| 348:. 336:) 332:| 322:. 310:) 306:| 296:. 284:) 280:| 270:. 258:) 254:| 244:. 212:) 163:| 159:| 155:| 151:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 71:) 67:| 52:. 744:) 740:( 723:. 708:. 676:( 659:( 642:( 623:( 603:( 554:( 547:: 543:@ 526:( 519:: 515:@ 500:( 472:( 452:( 445:: 441:@ 422:( 397:: 393:@ 381:( 354:( 328:( 302:( 276:( 250:( 236:) 228:· 222:· 214:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 184:( 176:( 173:) 167:) 129:( 114:) 110:( 63:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
WaddlesJP13
talk
contributions
18:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
FLEUR

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
FLEUR
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.