375:, with which it is typically cited gives more than 600 results of scientific publications. This is a relevant number in the field. The list of these codes and the articles on each code are used by students and researchers who want to work in the respective scientific field to get a first impression on what tools they can use for their investigations. In my opinion deleting an article on one of these codes would somehow imply that the article is special in some way. I don't see that for the article on FLEUR. If there are inappropriate statements in the article I would reformulate them or look for references if there is none backing the statement. As far as I see for the statements in the article on FLEUR there are references in terms of publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. I would like to understand the deletion nomination. Could you please clarify the thought?
448:
software projects that are in common use by many research groups and the option to combine them with the FLEUR code may be of interest to people interested in this wikipedia article. I guess at some point someone will write wikipedia articles on them. Before, I used the external links because that is how I saw references to these software packages in other wikipedia articles. I hope this resolves the external link problem in your sense.
522:
a wikipedia article is a different issue. I will look for a few publications, but that will take some time. Of course, some of the cited references in the wikipedia article are on methodological developments of the software. It is natural that you see people from the development group on such publications.
521:
I agree that it would be nice to add a few references on the usage of the code that are unrelated to the development group. Scrolling over the google scholar search list shows that there are many scientific articles that fall under this criterion. Finding nice examples that are not misplaced in such
549:
I now added two highly-cited references of work with FLEUR code usage that are unrelated to the development team. One is a Nature
Nanotechnology publication on graphene and the other is a Nature Communications article on certain physics in topological insulators. According to Google Scholar one has
618:
Thank you all for the constructive feedback so far. I'm still pretty new in creating new
Knowledge (XXG) articles. Your comments already gave me good instructions on what to care about in future articles and, of course, this article also already benefited from your feedback. I hope we can find a
465:
I just removed from the article a statement on the development of the code in the context of the
European center of excellence MaX. Even though the statements were backed by references the wording may have sounded promotional. I think this already eliminates or at least reduces the case for the
403:
to primary sources and the official website, used as a way to get readers of the article to visit the website, which should really only ever be included in the infobox at the official website parameter or under the "External links" section of the article for informative purposes. External links
447:
Sorry, I wasn't aware of this external link guideline. I also didn't perceive this as a disguise. I now moved the link to the FLEUR code homepage to a new external links section and turned other external links into links to
Knowledge (XXG) articles that still have to be written. These are all
598:
It's used in research that has been published in journals which are as good as we could ask for. While those papers don't go into depth on the details of the software itself, they do rely upon it in a significant way. I think there's enough to get it over the wiki-notability bar.
486:
This looks like a pretty ordinary article on a piece of scientific software. I'm not a fan of long feature lists (they do tend to read like the back of a software box, back in ye olden days when programs came in boxes), but that's a matter of style, not grounds for deletion. The
491:
looks pretty respectable, though not all of them are useful for our purposes; abstracts for conference presentations aren't really peer-reviewed publications, for example. I'd be inclined to keep if we had a few examples of the software being used by people other than
370:
Knowledge (XXG) has many articles on software projects similar to FLEUR. There are lists of such software projects linked in the article. Each article on such a software package describes the features of the respective code, just like the article on the FLEUR code. A
209:
575:, for example the software is extensively discussed in this white paper on FLAPW methods. or this German article, along with its extensive usage. In general, I think there needs to be a new criteria for
293:
170:
319:
345:
267:
655:: Open licensed software license in a seeming specialist scientific area which seems sustained over a large number of years now with some better sources identified.
608:
505:
203:
102:
117:
571:. Any promotional content/tone can be addressed on the talk page. I personally am not a huge fan either of the feature lists, but this passes
550:
more than 1000 citations, the other one more than 200. I think these are nice examples for the code usage. Is this enough or do we need more?
97:
90:
17:
427:
359:
333:
307:
281:
255:
68:
413:
559:
531:
488:
372:
111:
107:
764:
40:
400:
619:
consensus on keeping the article. Of course, I will also try to incorporate further feedback in a constructive way.
224:
399:
To clarify, along with the article being written like its an advertisement, the article has an abundancy of inline
191:
143:
138:
147:
721:"Ballistic transport in one-dimensional magnetic nanojunctions:A first-principles Wannier function approach"
660:
643:
130:
576:
405:
760:
728:
604:
501:
423:
355:
329:
303:
277:
251:
64:
36:
185:
620:
551:
523:
469:
449:
394:
378:
624:
584:
555:
527:
473:
453:
382:
217:
181:
656:
639:
700:
Davidović, Davor; Fabregat-Traver, Diego; Höhnerbach, Markus; di Napoli, Edoardo (2017-12-19).
681:
664:
647:
628:
588:
477:
457:
431:
386:
363:
337:
311:
285:
259:
72:
86:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
759:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
409:
241:
231:
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
600:
544:
516:
497:
442:
417:
349:
323:
297:
271:
245:
58:
572:
741:
240:
Promotionally-written article. Speedy deletion was declined but I believe this article is
720:
677:
580:
197:
579:
since it is a fine line between legitimate accreditation and promotional fanfare.
164:
702:"Accelerating the computation of FLAPW methods on heterogeneous architectures"
134:
673:
493:
701:
126:
78:
755:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
638:
this seems notable but it does need to be cleaned up a bit.
160:
156:
152:
216:
230:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
767:). No further edits should be made to this page.
412:, or that the person who created the article is
344:Note: This discussion has been included in the
318:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
294:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
408:are usually an indication that the article is
320:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
346:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
268:list of Science-related deletion discussions
118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
373:google scholar search on the code's website
343:
317:
291:
265:
692:
737:
726:
414:associated with the product or company
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
672:, significant use in research.--
103:Introduction to deletion process
1:
719:Hardrat, Björn (2012-11-28).
682:12:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
665:09:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
93:(AfD)? Read these primers!
73:18:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
784:
648:21:12, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
629:20:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
609:20:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
589:18:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
560:20:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
532:19:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
506:18:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
478:17:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
458:18:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
432:17:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
387:16:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
364:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
338:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
312:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
286:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
260:16:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
757:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
489:raw number of citations
736:Cite journal requires
91:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
706:arXiv:1712.07206
366:
340:
314:
288:
108:Guide to deletion
98:How to contribute
57:
775:
746:
745:
739:
734:
732:
724:
716:
710:
709:
697:
548:
520:
446:
398:
235:
234:
220:
168:
150:
88:
53:
34:
783:
782:
778:
777:
776:
774:
773:
772:
771:
765:deletion review
751:
750:
749:
735:
725:
718:
717:
713:
699:
698:
694:
542:
514:
440:
392:
177:
141:
125:
122:
85:
82:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
781:
779:
770:
769:
748:
747:
711:
691:
690:
686:
685:
684:
667:
650:
632:
631:
612:
611:
592:
591:
565:
564:
563:
562:
537:
536:
535:
534:
509:
508:
494:the developers
463:
462:
461:
460:
435:
434:
401:external links
368:
367:
341:
315:
289:
238:
237:
174:
121:
120:
115:
105:
100:
83:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
780:
768:
766:
762:
758:
753:
752:
743:
730:
722:
715:
712:
707:
703:
696:
693:
689:
683:
679:
675:
671:
668:
666:
662:
658:
657:Djm-leighpark
654:
651:
649:
645:
641:
640:BuySomeApples
637:
634:
633:
630:
626:
622:
617:
614:
613:
610:
606:
602:
597:
594:
593:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
567:
566:
561:
557:
553:
546:
541:
540:
539:
538:
533:
529:
525:
518:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
490:
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
467:
459:
455:
451:
444:
439:
438:
437:
436:
433:
429:
428:contributions
425:
421:
420:
415:
411:
407:
404:disguised as
402:
396:
391:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
374:
365:
361:
360:contributions
357:
353:
352:
347:
342:
339:
335:
334:contributions
331:
327:
326:
321:
316:
313:
309:
308:contributions
305:
301:
300:
295:
290:
287:
283:
282:contributions
279:
275:
274:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
256:contributions
253:
249:
248:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
172:
166:
162:
158:
154:
149:
145:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
119:
116:
113:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
95:
94:
92:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
69:contributions
66:
62:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
756:
754:
729:cite journal
714:
705:
695:
687:
669:
652:
635:
615:
595:
577:WP:NSOFTWARE
568:
483:
468:
464:
418:
377:
369:
350:
324:
298:
272:
246:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
84:
59:
49:
47:
31:
28:
443:WaddlesJP13
419:WaddlesJP13
351:WaddlesJP13
325:WaddlesJP13
299:WaddlesJP13
273:WaddlesJP13
247:WaddlesJP13
204:free images
60:WaddlesJP13
688:References
601:XOR'easter
583:(he/him •
545:XOR'easter
517:XOR'easter
498:XOR'easter
466:deletion.
761:talk page
738:|journal=
636:Weak keep
621:GreSebMic
581:Shushugah
552:GreSebMic
524:GreSebMic
470:GreSebMic
450:GreSebMic
406:Wikilinks
395:GreSebMic
379:GreSebMic
37:talk page
763:or in a
171:View log
112:glossary
39:or in a
616:Comment
484:Comment
242:WP:SPAM
210:WP refs
198:scholar
144:protect
139:history
89:New to
573:WP:GNG
182:Google
148:delete
225:JSTOR
186:books
165:views
157:watch
153:links
127:FLEUR
79:FLEUR
16:<
742:help
678:talk
674:Mvqr
670:Keep
661:talk
653:Keep
644:talk
625:talk
605:talk
596:Keep
585:talk
569:Keep
556:talk
528:talk
502:talk
474:talk
454:talk
424:talk
410:spam
383:talk
356:talk
330:talk
304:talk
278:talk
252:talk
218:FENS
192:news
161:logs
135:talk
131:edit
65:talk
50:keep
232:TWL
169:– (
733::
731:}}
727:{{
704:.
680:)
663:)
646:)
627:)
607:)
587:)
558:)
530:)
504:)
496:.
476:)
456:)
430:)
426:|
416:.
385:)
362:)
358:|
348:.
336:)
332:|
322:.
310:)
306:|
296:.
284:)
280:|
270:.
258:)
254:|
244:.
212:)
163:|
159:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
71:)
67:|
52:.
744:)
740:(
723:.
708:.
676:(
659:(
642:(
623:(
603:(
554:(
547::
543:@
526:(
519::
515:@
500:(
472:(
452:(
445::
441:@
422:(
397::
393:@
381:(
354:(
328:(
302:(
276:(
250:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
167:)
129:(
114:)
110:(
63:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.