350:, allowing for possibility of spinning out again at a later date when sources can be found. The nomination here highlights the problem with using boilerplate text. The article is reasonably (but not completely) referenced; original research is at a minimum. The references provided are all from a reliable source. There are very few plot details here, none of which would be considered "excessive" if the article had the information required to demonstrate notability. Only a few lines feel like game guide content. What we have here has been written well. If it wasn't for the fact I know TTN has been discussing the article on the talk page, one might easily assume he hasn't looked at it. Judging by what I'm reading at the talk page, the people working on Supreme Commander are currently trying to sort out articles relating to Command and Conquer, and thus are a little too busy to deal with sorting out this article, but seem confident they can get development and reception information. We have a plausible search term here, people willing to try to improve the article when time permits and decent prose to build on. Redirect or userify it. That way the editors won't have to start from scratch when they get around to it. Worst case scenario, allow editors to merge the content into the into the main article. --
274:
never in question. As such, if you blithely redirect it, it could destabilize the quality of the main
Supreme Commander article. As a person who is not knowledgeable about Supreme Commander and how much info is necessary, I think other voices should be heard. If Krator is still around, he has a good understanding of the article, and a worthwhile opinion. I myself am retired, and have a hazy understanding of current polices.--
273:
I believe this was originally created because there was so much necessary information for the factions of SupCom that a new article was necessary to cover it all. I see no problem with integration, but the article was voted to be an FA with the voters knowing the comprehensiveness of the factions was
258:. Apart from some opinions and trivial detail and images with dubious fair use claims, all the material is already in the main article, so there's no good reason to make a split off. The only thing I'd recommend to include in the main article is the faction logos in some combined logo image. -
181:, and that some time should be allowed to assist the article in reaching this standard. While eventualism is not such a great philosophy, I believe that by initiating this discussion we may be motivated into at least trying to improve the article before merging or deleting it.
195:
If you can provide sources that contain real world information comparable to the real world information of the
Starcraft list, I will gladly withdraw this for now. Until then, there is really no reason to believe that this has any potential.
176:
article without discussing this in any way or establishing consensus. I have opened a discussion on the article's talk page to attempt to arrive at one. I believe this article is improveable in line with
190:
214:, which makes it "safe" to include in the parent. Recreating the article with real-world information when we have that on hand would be better for all articles involved, in my opinion. --
123:
90:
85:
94:
205:
77:
237:
81:
210:
I think a straight redirect plus a quick merge for the moment would be fine, as there are citations meaning that the material is
401:
376:
359:
342:
321:
307:
283:
265:
249:
223:
163:
154:. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the current summary in the main article is adequate.
59:
17:
186:
73:
65:
416:
392:
to distingusih from real life supreme commanders such as
President of USA and Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.
182:
36:
415:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
389:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
397:
263:
279:
338:
367:, allowing for possibility of spinning out again at a later date when sources can be found per S@bre.
372:
178:
393:
300:
259:
333:
guidelines. The factions should be briefly discussed in the plot synopsis in the main article.
385:
292:
275:
245:
173:
135:
47:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
334:
368:
355:
296:
219:
330:
201:
159:
151:
139:
241:
147:
143:
53:
111:
211:
131:
351:
316:
215:
197:
155:
409:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118:
107:
103:
99:
329:- I fail to see how this, as a subject, conforms to
130:This list of fictional groups does not establish
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:). No further edits should be made to this page.
238:list of video game related deletion discussions
295:and cut all the excessive fair-use images per
8:
236:: This debate has been included in the
172:TTN redirected this article to the main
146:. Most of the information is made up of
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
402:23:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
377:20:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
360:16:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
343:13:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
322:06:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
308:07:57, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
284:06:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
266:00:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
250:23:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
224:23:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
206:23:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
191:23:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
164:23:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
144:reliable, third party sources
74:Factions in Supreme Commander
66:Factions in Supreme Commander
60:02:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
384:(pruning as necessary) into
436:
388:(which ought to be called
138:through the inclusion of
412:Please do not modify it.
390:Supreme Commander (game)
152:unnecessary plot details
32:Please do not modify it.
140:real world information
179:Species of Starcraft
183:Caissa's DeathAngel
44:The result was
386:Supreme Commander
293:Supreme Commander
252:
174:Supreme Commander
148:original research
136:Supreme Commander
48:Supreme Commander
427:
414:
319:
315:per DeathAngel.
305:
232:
121:
115:
97:
56:
34:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
423:
417:deletion review
410:
317:
301:
134:independent of
117:
88:
72:
69:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
431:
422:
421:
405:
404:
379:
362:
345:
324:
310:
286:
268:
253:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
420:
418:
413:
407:
406:
403:
399:
395:
394:Peterkingiron
391:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
320:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
303:sephiroth bcr
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
272:
269:
267:
264:
261:
257:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
180:
175:
171:
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
408:
381:
364:
347:
326:
312:
302:
288:
270:
255:
233:
169:
129:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
335:Marasmusine
369:PhilKnight
132:notability
46:merge to
365:Redirect
348:Redirect
256:Redirect
124:View log
297:WP:NFCC
291:– into
271:Comment
242:MrKIA11
91:protect
86:history
55:MBisanz
331:WP:WAF
327:Delete
119:delete
95:delete
382:Merge
352:Sabre
318:Xihr
289:Merge
142:from
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
398:talk
373:talk
356:talk
339:talk
313:Keep
299:. —
280:talk
246:talk
234:Note
220:talk
216:Izno
212:WP:V
202:talk
187:talk
170:Keep
160:talk
150:and
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
260:Mgm
198:TTN
156:TTN
400:)
375:)
358:)
341:)
282:)
276:CM
248:)
240:.
222:)
204:)
189:)
162:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
51:.
396:(
371:(
354:(
337:(
278:(
262:|
244:(
218:(
200:(
185:(
158:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.