Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Fashion Central - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

800:
sourcing is atrocious. Some sources can't be verified, others like PRLog are clearly not independent. Especially with Saqib's explanation above, the Tribune and the News sources from the struck !vote above read as extremely promotional and I do not believe we can count them towards NCORP. Paid or
234:
This is clearly PROMO, created by a now blocked sock puppet. It hasn't received sig/ in-depth coverage in RS, aside from some churnalism or paid coverage. Furthermore, it is not even a magazine as the article claims, but rather a boutique or maybe some e-commerce store.
417:, Despite my reduced activity in nominating pages for deletion since your msg on my tp, there continues to be a lack of participation in Pakistan-related AfD which is realy concerning. Can we draftify the articles at minimum if they're not eligible for soft deletion? 651:
states that coverage based on based on a company's marketing materials shouldn't be acceptable for WP:N. While they're suitable for WP:V purpose, but using them to establish GNG seems inadequate given the rigorous sourcing requirements for establishing
785:
I agree with Saqib's rationale above, none of the references are anything other than regurgitated company PR. Also "Mentions" and "Coverage" are not part of our notability criteria, it is the content that we look at.
203: 610:. It's a weak keep because it's unclear to me how to validate whether these examples are churnalism, and I don't know enough about Pakistani news outlets to know if they are afflicted with the issues posed by 614:. (RS Noticeboard discussions are mixed but appear to lean on the side of considering them RS.) I could probably be convinced otherwise but this is my take after reviewing the sources and searching for more. 710:. The magazine has just enough coverage to warrant an article. The nominator hasn't shown that the sources are actually paid for, and the claim that the article's original creators has been banned is false. 397:
I originally closed this discussion as a Soft Deletion, not knowing until I saw the deleted page that an earlier version on this article had been deleted as a PROD. So, it is not eligible for Soft Deletion.
458:
There has been a decline in AFD participation for over a year now. I don't see any editor advocating Draftification so I'd rather see if this relisting encourages mor participation over the coming week.
340: 594:. Nominator is correct; the subject is a retail outlet. In general I agree that the article is promotional in tone and needs significant cleanup to become encyclopedic. However, I find 647:, published on the same day - 29 September 2023 - to mark the subject's launch and the PROMO tone in both coverages suggests they're based on PR stuff and for PR purpose. 438: 160: 300: 262: 197: 344: 296: 632: 603: 92: 735:
clearly states even legitimate Indian (as well Pakistani) news organizations (print, television, and web) intermingle regular news with sponsored content and
803:
Through this new portal, relevant information will be available to users at the click of a mouse, ensuring that pertinent information is readily available.
107: 292: 479: 748: 739:
Paid news is a highly pervasive and deeply integrated practice within Indian (as well Pakistani) news media so requires extra vigilance!
133: 128: 137: 87: 80: 17: 321: 743:
clearly indicate this article was deleted and re-created multiple times for blatant advertising by SPAs including by now blocked
805:
is clearly not something we should rely on to decide that a for-profit company with a history of promotional editing is notable.
744: 120: 218: 635:
is based on an interview that only briefly mentions the subject, so I shall label it as a WP:TRIVIALMENTION. WP:NORG states
185: 101: 97: 384: 560: 359: 832: 40: 768: 669: 538: 278: 248: 164: 640: 599: 179: 54: 611: 815: 792: 774: 719: 698: 675: 623: 580: 544: 513: 493: 470: 450: 428: 409: 388: 348: 326: 284: 254: 175: 62: 694: 619: 124: 316: 36: 225: 116: 68: 813: 211: 595: 715: 575: 732: 607: 690: 628: 615: 380: 76: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
827:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
648: 637:
Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.
191: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
305: 336: 828: 762: 663: 532: 489: 446: 424: 272: 242: 806: 787: 724: 711: 570: 369: 154: 754: 682: 655: 524: 499: 485: 442: 420: 266: 236: 518: 504: 475: 461: 414: 400: 737:
press release–based write-ups, often with inadequate or no disclosure.
644: 731:. Please see my assessment above timestamped 20:58, 17 June 2024. 502:, thanks for the link to this discussion, I didn't know about it. 823:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
563:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
362:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
685:. I agree with your source analysis and changed my !vote to 339:. It is not a magazine, but a shopping mall type of thing. 740: 150: 146: 142: 210: 569:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 368:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 224: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 835:). No further edits should be made to this page. 606:sources already in the article that would clear 437:Note: This discussion has been included in the 291:Note: This discussion has been included in the 261:Note: This discussion has been included in the 439:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 263:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions 8: 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 436: 290: 260: 341:2A04:4A43:8AAF:F70C:B589:6E17:29C1:C9A7 802: 636: 749:Special:Contributions/Nokhaiz Kaunpal 521:, So you didn't get that ping. Right? 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 745:Special:Contributions/Zara-ahmad 480:reforms are the need of the time 295:lists for the following topics: 93:Introduction to deletion process 1: 478:, I see.. So it means some 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 852: 816:14:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 793:20:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 775:21:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 720:20:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 699:17:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC) 676:20:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 624:16:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 581:14:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 545:15:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 514:02:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC) 494:15:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 471:01:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC) 451:19:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 429:20:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) 410:01:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 389:13:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 63:15:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 825:Please do not modify it. 349:13:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC) 327:02:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 285:12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 255:12:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 639:Meanwhile, articles in 165:edits since nomination 81:Articles for deletion 602:, plus the Dawn and 641:The Express Tribune 727:, But I don't see 631:, The coverage in 583: 453: 391: 329: 287: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 843: 811: 801:not, stuff like 777: 771: 765: 759: 678: 672: 666: 660: 578: 573: 568: 566: 564: 547: 541: 535: 529: 512: 496: 469: 431: 408: 376: 373: 367: 365: 363: 324: 319: 312: 308: 293:deletion sorting 281: 275: 269: 251: 245: 239: 229: 228: 214: 158: 140: 78: 58: 34: 851: 850: 846: 845: 844: 842: 841: 840: 839: 833:deletion review 807: 769: 763: 755: 752: 729:enough coverage 670: 664: 656: 653: 612:WP:NEWSORGINDIA 600:Express Tribune 576: 571: 559: 557: 539: 533: 525: 522: 503: 483: 460: 418: 399: 374: 371: 358: 356: 322: 317: 310: 306: 279: 273: 267: 249: 243: 237: 171: 131: 117:Fashion Central 115: 112: 75: 72: 69:Fashion Central 61: 56: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 849: 847: 838: 837: 819: 818: 795: 780: 779: 778: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 586: 585: 567: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 455: 454: 434: 433: 432: 394: 393: 366: 352: 351: 330: 288: 232: 231: 168: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 53: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 848: 836: 834: 830: 826: 821: 820: 817: 814: 812: 810: 804: 799: 796: 794: 791: 790: 784: 781: 776: 772: 766: 760: 758: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 723: 722: 721: 717: 713: 709: 706: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 679: 677: 673: 667: 661: 659: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 627: 626: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 588: 587: 584: 582: 579: 574: 565: 562: 555: 546: 542: 536: 530: 528: 520: 517: 516: 515: 511: 509: 508: 501: 498: 497: 495: 491: 487: 481: 477: 474: 473: 472: 468: 466: 465: 457: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 435: 430: 426: 422: 416: 413: 412: 411: 407: 405: 404: 396: 395: 392: 390: 386: 382: 378: 377: 364: 361: 354: 353: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 331: 328: 325: 320: 315: 314: 313: 302: 298: 294: 289: 286: 282: 276: 270: 264: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252: 246: 240: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 166: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 60: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 824: 822: 808: 797: 788: 782: 756: 736: 728: 707: 691:Dclemens1971 686: 657: 629:Dclemens1971 616:Dclemens1971 590: 589: 558: 556: 526: 506: 505: 463: 462: 402: 401: 370: 357: 355: 332: 309: 304: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 74: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 198:free images 829:talk page 809:Toadspike 741:Page logs 708:Weak keep 596:WP:SIGCOV 591:Weak keep 311:Quidditch 37:talk page 831:or in a 789:HighKing 770:contribs 733:WP:RSNOI 725:Cortador 712:Cortador 671:contribs 633:The News 608:WP:NCORP 604:The News 561:Relisted 540:contribs 385:contribs 360:Relisted 301:Websites 280:contribs 250:contribs 161:View log 102:glossary 57:Rational 39:or in a 681:Thanks 649:WP:SIRS 598:in the 297:Fashion 204:WP refs 192:scholar 134:protect 129:history 79:New to 798:Delete 783:Delete 687:delete 577:plicit 337:WP:GNG 335:fails 333:Delete 176:Google 138:delete 50:delete 757:Saqib 683:Saqib 658:Saqib 652:WP:N. 527:Saqib 500:Saqib 486:Saqib 443:Saqib 421:Saqib 383:• ✏️ 268:Saqib 238:Saqib 219:JSTOR 180:books 155:views 147:watch 143:links 16:< 764:talk 747:and 716:talk 695:talk 665:talk 645:DAWN 643:and 620:talk 534:talk 490:talk 447:talk 425:talk 381:talk 379:(💬 372:Coco 345:talk 299:and 274:talk 244:talk 212:FENS 186:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 52:‎. / 519:Liz 476:Liz 415:Liz 375:bb8 265:. — 226:TWL 159:– ( 773:) 767:I 753:— 718:) 697:) 689:. 674:) 668:I 654:— 622:) 543:) 537:I 523:— 510:iz 492:) 484:— 467:iz 449:) 441:. 427:) 419:— 406:iz 387:) 347:) 307:WC 303:. 283:) 277:I 253:) 247:I 206:) 163:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 761:( 751:. 714:( 693:( 662:( 618:( 572:✗ 531:( 507:L 488:( 482:. 464:L 445:( 423:( 403:L 343:( 323:✎ 318:☎ 271:( 241:( 235:— 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Rational
15:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Fashion Central

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Fashion Central
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.