467:: Clearly non-notable musician that doesn't deserve to either be in mainspace or draftspace (I may sluggishly agree to userfy at request). My advice to the article creator is that he/she shouldn't waste his time on moving to draft, there is zero atom of notability in the subject. There are many probable notable Nigerian musicians that you can consider developing, instead of a totally non-notable one.
359:
editors taking a cursory glance at the article, seeing that it "has charted", and coming here to argue that of course it's notable because it has charted without realizing that the chart in question is a local chart. As for which charts would be valid for meeting MUSICBIO, I'm not familiar with any offhand, but they would at a minimum need to be a chart for the entire country, such as
338:. For me, if an artist is charting in a country of ~200 million people, it is notable. Looking at the guidelines, there is a lot of western bias in them when it comes to charts and awards that can be used to establish notability. There are other criteria that can be used to establish notability as well, not just whether the artist is charting well. Perhaps
358:
Lack of charting is not the basis of not meeting notability here: that comes down to the lack of coverage in reliable sources. The reason that I have specifically mentioned the lack of national charting is because the article does mention the local Lagos chart; I made this argument to head off
550:. A Google search of the subject doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources. The subject appears to be an up-and-coming artist with only three or fours singles, none of which are notable. I opposed the article being userfy. The subject doesn't have a music career to speak of.
513:
Rosguill, i put in alot of work in this article, all i'm pleading is for more time i am seriously unwell at the moment, when i fully recover i will make more research and improve the article, please send to draft rather than deleting. Thank
342:
can provide sources to establish that Fii3rd meets one or more of the other criterea? I don't think citing lack of charting in this case makes a good argument against notability due to the subject being outside the bias of that criteria.
382:-- Ultimately this seems like it needs more work to prove notability. The page creator has already stated this is a work in progress and that he/she would like more time to work on it. I think this is the best solution currently.
246:. Sources do not have significant independent coverage. I was unable to find anything better online––it seems that one of the subject's songs may charted in a local (Lagos) chart, but this does not meet the requirement of
207:
277:
160:
320:
Please i need more time to improve the article, would be glad if the article is sent to draft rather than deleted to afford me more time to work on the article. Thank you.
299:
201:
92:
450:: Upon further review of the subject, it seems unlikely to be considered notable in the near future. So I've changed my !vote to from draftify to delete. —
107:
529:
We can userfy if you insist, but I am skeptical that you will be able to find enough coverage in order for this to ever be ready for publication.
167:
87:
80:
17:
60:
101:
97:
408:
580:
40:
222:
189:
133:
128:
468:
137:
519:
325:
120:
476:
576:
561:
484:
183:
36:
335:
247:
243:
58:
515:
430:
387:
348:
339:
321:
255:
215:
179:
124:
563:
540:
523:
507:
488:
459:
442:
413:
391:
374:
352:
329:
313:
291:
269:
62:
455:
438:
404:
360:
334:
It seems odd to me that there are no
Nigerian charts that are listed as acceptable sources on
229:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
575:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
551:
480:
472:
250:
for the artist's work to be on a national music chart. Originally PRODed by me, endorsed by
116:
68:
239:
53:
383:
344:
52:. If anyone wants this userfied / drafted so they can work on it, please let me know.
533:
500:
367:
306:
284:
262:
195:
451:
434:
398:
251:
154:
496:
I would agree with
HandsomeBoy that drafting is not likely to help anyone.
258:
who did not make any additional improvements or justifications.
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
278:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
150:
146:
142:
214:
429:: Based on the above comment by the article creator
228:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
583:). No further edits should be made to this page.
298:Note: This discussion has been included in the
276:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
300:list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
363:which I found in a quick internet search.
297:
275:
254:, and then dePROD by the initial editor
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
1:
564:02:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
541:17:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
524:11:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
460:03:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
63:17:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
508:17:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
489:10:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
443:22:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
414:21:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
392:20:23, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
375:19:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
353:19:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
330:18:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
314:17:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
292:17:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
270:17:37, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
600:
573:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
81:Articles for deletion
396:Fine by me, FWIW. --
412:
316:
294:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
591:
559:
402:
401:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
599:
598:
594:
593:
592:
590:
589:
588:
587:
581:deletion review
552:
532:
499:
397:
366:
305:
283:
261:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
597:
595:
586:
585:
567:
566:
544:
543:
530:
516:Preciousobichi
511:
510:
497:
491:
462:
445:
431:Preciousobichi
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
364:
340:Preciousobichi
322:Preciousobichi
318:
317:
303:
295:
281:
259:
256:Preciousobichi
238:Does not meet
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
596:
584:
582:
578:
574:
569:
568:
565:
562:
560:
558:
557:
549:
546:
545:
542:
539:
538:
537:
528:
527:
526:
525:
521:
517:
509:
506:
505:
504:
495:
492:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
463:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
427:
423:
422:
415:
410:
406:
400:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:Send To Draft
378:
377:
376:
373:
372:
371:
362:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
341:
337:
332:
331:
327:
323:
315:
312:
311:
310:
301:
296:
293:
290:
289:
288:
279:
274:
273:
272:
271:
268:
267:
266:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
572:
570:
555:
553:
547:
535:
534:
512:
502:
501:
493:
464:
447:
425:
424:
379:
369:
368:
333:
319:
308:
307:
286:
285:
264:
263:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
494:Nom comment
481:HandsomeBoy
336:WP:MUSICBIO
248:WP:MUSICBIO
244:WP:MUSICBIO
202:free images
55:Ritchie333
577:talk page
384:Hobbes345
345:Hobbes345
37:talk page
579:or in a
536:Rosguill
531:signed,
503:Rosguill
498:signed,
426:Draftify
409:contribs
370:Rosguill
365:signed,
361:this one
309:Rosguill
304:signed,
287:Rosguill
282:signed,
265:Rosguill
260:signed,
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
554:Versace
479:, etc.
469:Samklef
452:MarkH21
435:MarkH21
399:Elmidae
252:Elmidae
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
548:Delete
465:Delete
448:Delete
240:WP:GNG
180:Google
138:delete
117:Fii3rd
69:Fii3rd
50:delete
477:Saeon
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
556:1608
520:talk
514:You.
485:talk
456:talk
439:talk
433:. —
405:talk
388:talk
349:talk
326:talk
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
473:Kel
242:or
230:TWL
159:– (
522:)
487:)
475:,
471:,
458:)
441:)
407:·
390:)
351:)
328:)
302:.
280:.
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
518:(
483:(
454:(
437:(
411:)
403:(
386:(
347:(
324:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.