260:- extremely clearly non-notable. All primary or non-independent references inside. Nothing of any benefit elsewhere. Given the basis on which the PROD was removed, I'd specifically note that lewdgamer is not a reliable source, and this is a viewpoint also considered on the reliable/source noticeboard. Even if it were, 2+ reviews are generally needed to pass notability for games. As a side note, on the extremely off chance this remains, a proper detailing of sources in-article would be appreciated.
680:
very niche and there's no coverage other than that, I think it's still best to delete, since a hit in an obscure slice of a tiny genre (the justification for "hit" is that its subreddit has 3,200 subscribers, but that's not really a high bar). There may be potential for a future article if more sources end up covering it though, which seems like a possibility given the controversial and questionable moral nature of the game. –
461:- Also looked for sources. Found the same Kotaku article that others dug up. Noticed that there are actually two version by two different authors (.com.au and .com), but the fact remains that despite multiple people searching for anything remotely authoritative, there is nothing remotely authoritative. Also, I went to the other sources referenced in the article and they literally have pop ups for
679:
Not to pile on here, but having read the Kotaku article that represents the most significant coverage of this game, it actually makes a somewhat strong case that it's significant, calling it "a hit" and "closest...ever come to mainstream". However, given that this genre of games itself seems to be
444:(republished a couple of places). The other sources in the article are not enough to demonstrate notability. I do not think there are any other reliable sources out there, and one source with a few short paragraphs doesn't justify an article.
207:
338:
588:
465:. User history seems to indicate plausible sockpuppet account as well. This article is the most blatant, but there are some other questionable edits/articles in the history. If possible to do a
318:
160:
523:- given the issues with the sources (beyond their failure at actually being sources), at the SNOW avalanche going on, could I ask an admin to consider this for a SNOW close?
562:
201:
298:
92:
107:
167:
500:
I couldn't find any multiple reliable-independent, sufficient coverage of the game anywhere after doing exhaustive searches on it. So delete
626:
295:
644:
630:
477:
438:
87:
80:
17:
60:
282:
133:
128:
137:
101:
97:
222:
472:
398:
189:
120:
705:
40:
549:
278:
602:
576:
383:
showed at least one RS mention/content, but there was certainly nothing treating the topic in significance. --
183:
648:
634:
545:
366:
466:
701:
528:
507:
265:
179:
36:
688:
671:
652:
638:
606:
580:
553:
532:
515:
490:
453:
429:
410:
392:
370:
350:
330:
310:
286:
269:
251:
62:
124:
58:
486:
478:
https://www.kotaku.com.au/2018/07/porn-game-developers-are-making-big-money-thanks-to-crowdfunding/
229:
215:
449:
425:
116:
68:
380:
279:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.
681:
667:
362:
346:
326:
306:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
700:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
524:
501:
261:
541:
53:
195:
598:
572:
482:
406:
388:
239:
473:
https://kotaku.com/porn-game-developers-are-making-big-money-thanks-to-cro-1827846560
445:
421:
663:
462:
342:
322:
302:
154:
420:
as previous PROD-er. Not finding much in the way of reliable secondary sources.
662:
game doesn't meet any sort of notability guideline and sources are lacking.
622:
592:
566:
402:
384:
625:
disambiguation page as the plural is a reasonable search term including
277:. No nontrivial reliably sourced content, likely no RS content at all.
442:
which Izno already found, but which I overlooked for some reason,
696:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
361:
I couldn't find trusted sources mentioning this game. --
339:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
589:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
401:. Two paragraphs in one work is not multiple sources. --
150:
146:
142:
593:
567:
214:
437:- I looked for sources and, to my surprise, did find
617:
current article as failing GNG per above and create
228:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
708:). No further edits should be made to this page.
587:Note: This discussion has been included in the
561:Note: This discussion has been included in the
337:Note: This discussion has been included in the
319:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
317:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
563:list of History-related deletion discussions
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
586:
560:
336:
316:
294:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
627:Template:R from other capitalisation
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
1:
238:Non notable game, Fails GNG –
689:21:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
672:14:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
653:17:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
639:14:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
607:00:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
581:00:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
554:18:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
533:16:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
516:16:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
491:02:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
454:01:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
430:00:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
411:23:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
393:19:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
371:18:22, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
351:17:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
331:17:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
311:17:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
287:17:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
270:17:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
252:16:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
63:12:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
725:
540:, article strongly fails
397:So, there is a source at
698:Please do not modify it.
469:, might be worth doing.
32:Please do not modify it.
296:WikiProject Pornography
601:) — If (reply) then (
575:) — If (reply) then (
81:Articles for deletion
510:-constructive zone
379:. A review of the
609:
583:
546:Videogameplayer99
514:
375:I am inclined to
353:
333:
299:list of deletions
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
716:
506:
443:
313:
249:
244:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
724:
723:
719:
718:
717:
715:
714:
713:
712:
706:deletion review
441:
293:
245:
240:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
722:
720:
711:
710:
692:
691:
674:
657:
656:
655:
611:
610:
584:
557:
556:
535:
518:
511:
504:
495:
494:
493:
480:
475:
456:
432:
415:
414:
413:
373:
355:
354:
334:
314:
290:
289:
272:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
721:
709:
707:
703:
699:
694:
693:
690:
687:
686:
685:
678:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
658:
654:
650:
646:
645:216.8.143.171
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
631:24.151.50.175
628:
624:
620:
616:
613:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
590:
585:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
564:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
536:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:Close Request
519:
517:
513:
512:
509:
505:
502:
499:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
470:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
440:
436:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
292:
291:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:Strong Delete
256:
255:
254:
253:
250:
248:
243:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
697:
695:
684:FenixFeather
683:
682:
676:
659:
618:
614:
537:
520:
508:
497:
467:WP:CheckUser
458:
434:
417:
376:
363:Gprscrippers
358:
274:
257:
246:
241:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
643:Yes, this.
525:Nosebagbear
262:Nosebagbear
202:free images
117:Free Cities
69:Free Cities
55:Ritchie333
702:talk page
623:free city
483:DirkDouse
463:cam sites
343:• Gene93k
323:• Gene93k
303:• Gene93k
37:talk page
704:or in a
619:Redirect
599:🗣️ Talk
573:🗣️ Talk
446:Grayfell
422:Aspening
381:WP:VG/SE
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
664:Adamtt9
603:ping me
577:ping me
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
677:Delete
660:Delete
615:Delete
542:WP:GNG
538:Delete
498:Delete
459:Delete
435:Delete
418:Delete
399:Kotaku
377:delete
359:Delete
275:Delete
180:Google
138:delete
50:delete
242:Davey
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
668:talk
649:talk
635:talk
594:Tyw7
568:Tyw7
550:talk
529:talk
503:JC7V
487:talk
450:talk
426:talk
407:talk
403:Izno
389:talk
385:Izno
367:talk
347:talk
327:talk
307:talk
283:talk
266:talk
247:2010
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
621:to
439:one
230:TWL
159:– (
670:)
651:)
637:)
629:.
605:)
591:.
579:)
565:.
552:)
544:.
531:)
489:)
452:)
428:)
409:)
391:)
369:)
349:)
341:.
329:)
321:.
309:)
301:.
285:)
268:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
52:.
666:(
647:(
633:(
597:(
571:(
548:(
527:(
485:(
448:(
424:(
405:(
387:(
365:(
345:(
325:(
305:(
281:(
264:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.