746:. Unless it explicitly says alternative newspapers are not valid then there is no reason to suppose they are not valid. The guidelines say nothing about "tabloids" either which was the basis for you claiming alternative newspapers aren't valid. I have no idea why you have made it your personal mission to have this deleted but it appears that you have made this personal for some reason. Please just step back and stop making up guidelines and removing valid references.
1054:
states "Tabloid journalism is a style of journalism that emphasizes sensational crime stories, gossip columns about celebrities and sports stars, extreme political views and opinions from one perspective, junk food news, and sun sign astrology." This is an indication of unreliablitity - it aims to
340:
Punknews.org is a website founded by Aubin Paul in 1999. The website publishes music news and album reviews relating to punk rock, hardcore punk, ska, alternative, indie rock, heavy metal and hip hop. It features user-submitted and editor-evaluated articles, through a publishing format much like
1130:
You desperately want this article deleted so you started removing valid references using made up criteria and when confronted you spent a half an hour scouring
Knowledge (XXG) for something you might be able to use and all you could find was an essay but no guideline. You claimed
1008:
that Metro Times was an alternative weekly which somehow made it basically a tabloid and that tabloids aren't WP:RS. Not a single part of that is true but that was your argument. Show me any discussion on
Knowledge (XXG) that says
216:
324:
2. Although it has significant coverage, I struggle to see reliability in the source. I have never heard of silive.com and it appears to be more of a blog area, but that is simply my observation
269:
169:
857:
384:
210:
705:, "similar to" does not equal "is the same as". Alternative newspapers are reliable sources no matter how badly you want this article deleted. Actually, I just looked over
784:
says anything at all about "tabloids" or "alternative newspapers" and I will. You don't get to make up guidelines and then dare me to disprove them. Here is a guideline
377:
which is also reliable. Your personal view of the professionalism of the verbiage doesn't matter. It was authored by a member of the Fort Worth Music Hall of Fame
101:
116:
409:"Your personal view of the professionalism of the verbiage doesn't matter". Would you like to explain why you think that my "personal views... matter"?
176:
392:
860:
discussing its validity), equivalent television shows, should be used with caution, especially if they are making sensational claims. The
1094:
Ok, I'll just ask Davo if he can write a guideline on every news website in every country of the world. Davo is up for it! Lets go Davo.
142:
137:
146:
96:
89:
17:
231:
129:
198:
1139:
which it doesn't. You claimed alternative newspapers are tabloids which violate WP:RS but WP:RS says nothing about tabloids
110:
106:
531:
Why do you think your personal view of the professionalism of the writing has anything to do with whether or not it is a
1237:
40:
66:
334:
4. Doesn't mention the album (after a skim read and a search for the term "Funland" - if it is mentioned, please say)
192:
1211:
as this has been reviewed by multiple sources reliable enough for popular music, as currently cited in the article.
425:
Because whether or not Willbb234 appreciates the writing style has nothing to do with whether or not something is a
188:
1143:
alternative newspapers being invalid. I don't have to disprove made up guidelines. You have to find real ones.
840:
1135:(which as the article notes is "the largest circulating weekly newspaper in the metro Detroit area") violated
1220:
1203:
1172:
1152:
1125:
1105:
1089:
1066:
1038:
1022:
991:
967:
948:
927:
891:
813:
797:
775:
755:
738:
718:
696:
672:
642:
590:
564:
548:
526:
506:
488:
472:
454:
438:
420:
404:
361:
305:
281:
277:
261:
71:
934:
477:
Of course you didn't devalue me as a person and I never said you did. You still devalued my view, however.
238:
1148:
1085:
1018:
963:
923:
793:
751:
714:
668:
638:
586:
544:
502:
468:
434:
400:
301:
1233:
1110:
Oh, and while Davo is doing that, would you mind telling me where it says that
Detroit Metro Times is a
1073:
905:
682:
656:
367:
36:
1144:
1081:
1014:
959:
919:
789:
747:
710:
664:
634:
582:
540:
498:
464:
430:
396:
297:
626:
1199:
133:
1162:
1115:
1095:
1056:
1028:
981:
938:
881:
803:
785:
765:
761:
743:
728:
686:
660:
554:
516:
478:
444:
410:
351:
251:
463:
didn't matter. I didn't devalue you as a person. Please don't pretend I made insults I never made.
224:
630:
293:
248:
1216:
1051:
835:
578:
273:
204:
374:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1232:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
381:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1191:
897:
877:
378:
370:
which is a reliable source. The author of that article is the news manager for SILive.com.
1195:
727:, can you tell me where it says that alternative newspapers are reliable sources? Thanks,
125:
77:
62:
1136:
1111:
901:
781:
724:
706:
702:
701:
Overlooking that you are using your own views to radically reinterpret the guidelines at
652:
570:
535:? It was that notion which I took issue with. Your personal view of the author's writing
532:
426:
347:
328:
318:
868:
371:
1212:
1167:
1120:
1100:
1061:
1033:
986:
943:
910:
886:
862:
808:
770:
733:
691:
559:
521:
483:
449:
415:
356:
256:
1055:
bring in an audience by shocking them instead of telling completely the true story.
788:. You never notified me that this was even up for deletion I had to happen upon it.
846:
663:
is deliberately removing valid sources in an attempt to have the article deleted.
569:
What I personally think of the style of writing has nothing to do with it meeting
163:
553:
So you think "Sorry, kids" is the first sentence of a reliable piece of writing?
1132:
1077:
1010:
977:
955:
622:
292:
The album has references which include reviews that meet the first criteria of
852:
53:
337:
5. Issues with reliability. See what the
Spanish Knowledge (XXG) has to say:
629:
have been added which cement the fact that this meets the first criteria of
681:
It does, however, state that tabloids are to be avoided, which the article
709:
and I can find no mention of "tabloids" either. Where is this guideline?
331:
as it reads very much like a blog post - first sentence is "Sorry, kids."
1228:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
581:
used earthy language but his journalism was still journalism.
539:
and isn't a criteria for claiming a reference isn't reliable.
937:, there are multiple tabloids which are in the edit filter.
314:
I will give a breakdown of my views on the sources provided:
1027:
Just waiting for Davo to finish up writing the guidelines.
1005:
915:
648:
159:
155:
151:
223:
1114:, seeing as I have given you my explanation. Thanks,
270:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
723:
If you are saying that I am "radically reinterpret"
237:
764:as I can't see the relevant information. Thanks,
443:That isn't to say that my view "doesn't matter".
341:popular technology-related news website Slashdot.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1240:). No further edits should be made to this page.
918:which you did by claiming a violation of WP:RS.
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
1080:specifically. You are creating new guidelines.
832:
780:I'll tell you what: show me specifically where
380:who has penned liner notes for numerous albums.
338:
8:
900:is an essay not a guideline. It is also not
872:should be treated with even greater caution.
497:because it is irrelevant to the discussion.
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
760:Sorry, you'll have to be more specific at
267:
976:You asked me about tabloids and not the
914:. Quoting WP:PUS does not justify your
1072:Those quotes have nothing to to with
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
685:says that they are very similar to.
958:which you claimed wasn't reliable.
24:
459:I specifically said your view of
1157:A lot of people buy it? Wow, it
346:User-generated content is not a
102:Introduction to deletion process
511:Ok, so you did devalue my view
393:according to Wikiproject Albums
954:WP:DEPSOURCES doesn't mention
1:
577:think of the writing either.
1221:12:28, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
1204:12:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
1173:20:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1153:20:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1126:20:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1106:20:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1090:20:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1067:20:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1039:20:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
1023:20:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
992:20:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
968:20:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
949:19:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
928:20:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
892:19:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
814:20:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
798:19:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
776:19:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
756:19:40, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
739:19:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
719:19:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
697:19:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
673:19:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
643:19:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
591:20:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
565:20:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
549:20:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
527:20:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
507:19:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
489:19:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
473:19:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
455:19:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
439:18:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
421:18:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
405:18:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
362:17:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
306:13:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
282:11:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
262:09:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
72:15:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1257:
908:are not the same thing as
573:. It doesn't matter what
1230:Please do not modify it.
916:removal of valid sources
32:Please do not modify it.
659:'s not being reliable.
321:as it is user-generated
1074:Alternative newspapers
1050:The first sentence of
906:Alternative newspapers
874:
343:
683:alternative newspaper
657:alternative newspaper
368:Staten Island Advance
90:Articles for deletion
1190:Looks to me to meet
317:1. Discogs is not a
655:says nothing about
651:reek of bad faith.
385:considered reliable
1052:Tabloid journalism
836:tabloid newspapers
579:Hunter S. Thompson
1171:
1170:}} me in replies)
1124:
1123:}} me in replies)
1104:
1103:}} me in replies)
1065:
1064:}} me in replies)
1037:
1036:}} me in replies)
990:
989:}} me in replies)
947:
946:}} me in replies)
890:
889:}} me in replies)
858:February 2017 RFC
812:
811:}} me in replies)
774:
773:}} me in replies)
737:
736:}} me in replies)
695:
694:}} me in replies)
563:
562:}} me in replies)
525:
524:}} me in replies)
487:
486:}} me in replies)
453:
452:}} me in replies)
419:
418:}} me in replies)
375:Fort Worth Weekly
360:
359:}} me in replies)
284:
260:
259:}} me in replies)
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
1248:
1165:
1118:
1098:
1059:
1031:
1013:isn't reliable.
984:
941:
884:
806:
768:
731:
689:
627:Spectrum Culture
557:
519:
481:
447:
413:
383:Punknews.org is
373:Number three is
354:
254:
242:
241:
227:
179:
167:
149:
87:
58:
34:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1238:deletion review
427:reliable source
184:
175:
140:
126:Funland (album)
124:
121:
84:
81:
78:Funland (album)
70:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1254:
1252:
1243:
1242:
1224:
1223:
1206:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1076:in general or
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
997:
996:
995:
994:
971:
970:
931:
930:
869:Sunday Express
856:(see also the
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
802:My apologies.
676:
675:
647:I think edits
645:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
537:doesn't matter
513:OF THE WRITING
495:of the writing
366:Number two is
344:
335:
332:
325:
322:
315:
309:
308:
286:
285:
245:
244:
181:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1253:
1241:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1226:
1225:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1161:be reliable!
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
993:
988:
983:
979:
975:
974:
973:
972:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
952:
951:
950:
945:
940:
936:
935:WP:DEPSOURCES
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:
911:Daily Express
907:
903:
899:
896:
895:
894:
893:
888:
883:
879:
873:
871:
870:
865:
864:
863:Daily Express
859:
855:
854:
849:
848:
843:
842:
837:
834:*In general,
815:
810:
805:
801:
800:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
772:
767:
763:
759:
758:
757:
753:
749:
745:
742:
741:
740:
735:
730:
726:
722:
721:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
698:
693:
688:
684:
680:
679:
678:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
621:Reviews from
620:
619:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
567:
566:
561:
556:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
523:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
485:
480:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
451:
446:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
417:
412:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
376:
372:
369:
365:
364:
363:
358:
353:
349:
345:
342:
336:
333:
330:
326:
323:
320:
316:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:Coolabahapple
271:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
253:
250:
240:
236:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
190:
187:
186:Find sources:
182:
178:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1229:
1227:
1208:
1187:
1158:
1145:Notfrompedro
1140:
1082:Notfrompedro
1049:
1015:Notfrompedro
960:Notfrompedro
932:
920:Notfrompedro
909:
875:
867:
861:
851:
847:Daily Mirror
845:
839:
833:
790:Notfrompedro
748:Notfrompedro
711:Notfrompedro
665:Notfrompedro
635:Notfrompedro
583:Notfrompedro
574:
541:Notfrompedro
536:
512:
499:Notfrompedro
494:
465:Notfrompedro
460:
431:Notfrompedro
397:Notfrompedro
388:
339:
298:Notfrompedro
289:
246:
234:
228:
220:
213:
207:
201:
195:
185:
172:
83:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1133:Metro Times
1078:Metro Times
1011:Metro Times
1006:you claimed
978:Metro Times
956:Metro Times
623:Metro Times
461:the writing
211:free images
67:revolutions
1196:Bondegezou
1166:(please {{
1119:(please {{
1099:(please {{
1060:(please {{
1032:(please {{
985:(please {{
942:(please {{
885:(please {{
853:Daily Mail
838:, such as
807:(please {{
786:WP:AFDLIST
769:(please {{
762:WP:NEWSORG
744:WP:NEWSORG
732:(please {{
690:(please {{
558:(please {{
520:(please {{
493:Your view
482:(please {{
448:(please {{
414:(please {{
391:wikipedia
355:(please {{
350:. Thanks,
255:(please {{
1234:talk page
1163:Willbb234
1116:Willbb234
1096:Willbb234
1057:Willbb234
1029:Willbb234
982:Willbb234
939:Willbb234
882:Willbb234
804:Willbb234
766:Willbb234
729:Willbb234
687:Willbb234
661:Willbb234
649:like this
631:WP:NALBUM
555:Willbb234
517:Willbb234
479:Willbb234
445:Willbb234
411:Willbb234
352:Willbb234
327:3. Not a
294:WP:NALBUM
252:Willbb234
249:WP:NALBUM
37:talk page
1236:or in a
1213:feminist
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
841:The Sun
217:WP refs
205:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
63:spin me
1192:WP:GNG
898:WP:PUS
878:WP:PUS
850:, the
247:Fails
189:Google
147:delete
1137:WP:RS
1112:WP:RS
902:WP:RS
782:WP:RS
725:WP:RS
707:WP:RS
703:WP:RS
653:WP:RS
571:WP:RS
533:WP:RS
348:WP:RS
329:WP:RS
319:WP:RS
232:JSTOR
193:books
177:Stats
164:views
156:watch
152:links
56:78.26
16:<
1217:talk
1209:Keep
1200:talk
1188:Keep
1168:ping
1159:must
1149:talk
1121:ping
1101:ping
1086:talk
1062:ping
1034:ping
1019:talk
987:ping
964:talk
944:ping
924:talk
887:ping
866:and
809:ping
794:talk
771:ping
752:talk
734:ping
715:talk
692:ping
669:talk
639:talk
625:and
587:talk
560:ping
545:talk
522:ping
503:talk
484:ping
469:talk
450:ping
435:talk
416:ping
401:talk
389:this
357:ping
302:talk
290:Keep
278:talk
257:ping
225:FENS
199:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
50:keep
1004:No
933:At
876:At
575:you
387:on
239:TWL
168:– (
1219:)
1202:)
1194:.
1151:)
1141:or
1088:)
1021:)
980:.
966:)
926:)
904:.
880:.
844:,
796:)
754:)
717:)
671:)
641:)
633:.
589:)
547:)
515:.
505:)
471:)
437:)
429:.
403:)
395:.
304:)
296:.
280:)
272:.
219:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
65:/
52:.
1215:(
1198:(
1147:(
1084:(
1017:(
962:(
922:(
792:(
750:(
713:(
667:(
637:(
585:(
543:(
501:(
467:(
433:(
399:(
300:(
276:(
243:)
235:·
229:·
221:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
191:(
183:(
180:)
173:·
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
69:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.