693:. There are numerous articles about how it was changed to a no contest and this controversy persisted in post-event coverage of the fight for some time afterwards, meaning that its coverage went beyond routine next day post-fight results to include article length discussions of the controversial changes several days after the event aired and in many different articles in Polish and English alike. So, we have an event with a title fight, in which notable fighters participated, from Poland's largest MMA promotion, and due to a controversial decision change, coverage of the event that continued across multiple websites for days after the event discussing the controversial change, why it happened, its significance, etc. beyond just listing results. Something with a championship fight from a major international promotion with notable fighters, and coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources in at least two languages absolutely meets our inclusion criteria. Thank you for reconsidering! --
685:. The strongman is internationally known due to his many accomplishments. So, this event, which also featured a title fight, is covered extensively in European sources in the context of how it has affected the legacy of arguably the greatest strongman in modern times. The results of the event are
630:
There is a thing called Google and a thing called the Polish language. If you both to do actual research beyond just looking at the article, you will see that the event is covered in non-routine manner in other sources, including not just in
English. You have failed to present any reason for
505:
Per our guidelines multiple reliable sources does indeed guarantee notability. The NFL has many events every year. KSW has had XVII events total. They are not comparable. NFL and KSW are apples and oranges. KSW events are more sporadic and therefore less routine than NFL events.
385:
Lol what?! The light heavyweight championship was one of the fights and in one the main fights a man considered the greatest strong man of all time competed. An event associated with a legend of sports and an event in which a championship was decided is not "routine". Ha!
689:
to in coverage of future events, i.e. showing their continued relevance to the notable fighters' history. Another way that the coverage is non-routine is due to the most important fight's results being changed after the event aired:
611:
Actually, it is blatantly true that those are the only two sources. You have also failed to give any sources to show "non-routine coverage" or that these events are historically significant (as required by
171:
453:
As has been pointed out many times before, every NFL game has multiple reliable sources, but that's not sufficient to make them all notable. Multiple sources does not guarantee notability.
589:
due to the non-routine coverage of the event in Polish and
English language sources alike. It is blatantly dishonest to claim it is only covered by the organization and Sherdog. --
230:
126:
571:. In addition, coverage is from the organization and sherdog only (although additional sources, as previously mentioned, still wouldn't make these events notable).
165:
489:
The event has stand alone notability due to coverage in multiple reliable sources. The fact that notable fighters participated in it adds to its notability. --
686:
336:
on MMA notability issues, it would absolutely not be prudent to delete this or any categorically related article until that discussion is resolved.
668:
is on the keepers to demonstrate that non-routine, independent coverage exists, and that has not been met. If it is, would be glad to reconsider.
691:
682:
131:
694:
636:
590:
535:
507:
490:
432:
387:
354:
261:, there is no attempt to demonstrate any lasting significance, both are newsworth events, yes, just not encyclopaedic ones, they fail
286:. Up-and-coming MMA promotions are very notable with the current state of MMA and the UFC today and also, excellent article.
17:
333:
520:
Another clearly false statement since all NFL games have multiple reliable sources and yet most are not considered notable.
276:
99:
94:
186:
103:
153:
303:
The promotion's notability is not the issue. These events fail all the notability criteria previously mentioned (
723:
86:
40:
635:. It is insulting and plain lazy to ask me or anyone else to do what you should be able to do on your own. --
291:
698:
640:
594:
539:
511:
494:
436:
391:
358:
472:
147:
431:
due to coverage in multiple international reliable sources and the participation of notable fighters? --
719:
308:
211:
57:
36:
143:
702:
677:
644:
625:
621:
598:
580:
576:
543:
529:
525:
515:
498:
484:
480:
462:
458:
440:
422:
418:
395:
380:
376:
362:
345:
324:
295:
287:
278:
242:
179:
90:
68:
238:
202:
This is a non-notable MMA event promoted by a second tier organization. The article consists of
193:
221:
673:
661:
568:
312:
203:
82:
74:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
718:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
665:
632:
341:
320:
271:
371:
There's no indication anywhere that this event had "historic significance for Polish MMA."
613:
586:
564:
304:
262:
207:
53:
617:
572:
521:
476:
454:
414:
372:
256:
353:
due to participation of notable fighters and historic significance for Polish MMA. --
159:
428:
410:
234:
334:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts/MMA_notability
669:
467:
If the fighters are notable, they could have their own articles. That doesn't make
534:
So then by your own admission, if anything we should also cover all NFL games. --
120:
337:
316:
266:
65:
217:
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reasons.
712:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
52:
via consensus below which indicates a failure to meet both
311:) and the article is nothing but the results, so it fails
116:
112:
108:
178:
683:
Check the polish articles from non-MMA specific sites
660:- The only independent coverage appears to be either
332:However, as there is an ongoing WP discussion at
231:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
726:). No further edits should be made to this page.
192:
8:
229:Note: This debate has been included in the
228:
7:
206:sports results and the event fails
24:
409:; seems to fall far short of the
471:notable, because notability is
427:Even though it actually passes
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
743:
581:18:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
463:18:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
441:14:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
423:11:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
381:18:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
363:15:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
346:12:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
325:15:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
296:04:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
279:02:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
243:02:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
56:and by similar reasoning
715:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
703:18:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
678:14:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
645:19:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
626:17:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
599:14:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
544:19:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
530:17:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
516:14:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
499:14:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
485:11:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
396:19:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
69:19:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
585:Actually, it passes
330:Merge into Omnibus
48:The result was
245:
734:
717:
274:
269:
260:
197:
196:
182:
134:
124:
106:
34:
742:
741:
737:
736:
735:
733:
732:
731:
730:
724:deletion review
713:
473:WP:NOTINHERITED
272:
267:
254:
139:
130:
97:
81:
78:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
740:
738:
729:
728:
708:
707:
706:
705:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
604:
603:
602:
601:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
503:
502:
501:
446:
445:
444:
443:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
366:
365:
348:
327:
309:WP:SPORTSEVENT
298:
288:LogicalCreator
281:
247:
246:
225:
224:
212:WP:SPORTSEVENT
200:
199:
136:
77:
72:
58:WP:SPORTSEVENT
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
739:
727:
725:
721:
716:
710:
709:
704:
700:
696:
695:24.112.202.78
692:
688:
684:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
656:
655:
646:
642:
638:
637:24.112.202.78
634:
631:deletion per
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
600:
596:
592:
591:24.112.202.78
588:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
559:
558:
545:
541:
537:
536:24.112.202.78
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
508:24.112.202.78
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:24.112.202.78
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
442:
438:
434:
433:24.112.202.78
430:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
397:
393:
389:
388:24.112.202.78
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
355:24.112.202.78
352:
349:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
270:
264:
258:
252:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
226:
223:
220:
219:
218:
215:
213:
209:
205:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
714:
711:
657:
560:
468:
406:
350:
329:
300:
283:
250:
216:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
49:
47:
31:
28:
658:Delete both
561:Delete both
301:Delete both
251:Delete Both
166:free images
60:as well as
662:WP:ROUTINE
569:WP:ROUTINE
469:this event
313:WP:ROUTINE
253:as per my
204:WP:ROUTINE
62:WP:ROUTINE
720:talk page
666:WP:BURDEN
633:WP:BEFORE
618:Astudent0
573:Astudent0
522:Astudent0
477:bobrayner
455:Astudent0
415:bobrayner
373:Astudent0
222:KSW XVIII
37:talk page
722:or in a
614:WP:EVENT
587:WP:EVENT
565:WP:EVENT
305:WP:EVENT
263:WP:EVENT
235:Papaursa
208:WP:EVENT
127:View log
83:KSW XVII
75:KSW XVII
54:WP:EVENT
39:or in a
687:alluded
670:Rlendog
172:WP refs
160:scholar
100:protect
95:history
664:. The
563:Fails
429:WP:GNG
407:Delete
338:Beansy
317:Mdtemp
144:Google
104:delete
50:Delete
257:prod2
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
66:Panyd
16:<
699:talk
674:talk
641:talk
622:talk
595:talk
577:talk
567:and
540:talk
526:talk
512:talk
495:talk
481:talk
459:talk
437:talk
419:talk
392:talk
377:talk
359:talk
351:Keep
342:talk
321:talk
292:talk
284:Keep
273:king
239:talk
210:and
180:FENS
154:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
616:).
411:GNG
214:.
194:TWL
129:•
125:– (
701:)
676:)
643:)
624:)
597:)
579:)
542:)
528:)
514:)
506:--
497:)
483:)
475:.
461:)
439:)
421:)
413:.
394:)
386:--
379:)
361:)
344:)
323:)
315:.
294:)
268:Mt
265:.
259:}}
255:{{
241:)
233:.
174:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
64:.
697:(
672:(
639:(
620:(
593:(
575:(
538:(
524:(
510:(
493:(
479:(
457:(
435:(
417:(
390:(
375:(
357:(
340:(
319:(
307:,
290:(
237:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.