Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Kami (app) - Knowledge

Source 📝

403:
But make draft. Anecdotally, I'd be inclined to say Keep, as being local to NZ I have heard about this company. However but can't find any examples of deep, non-trivial tertiary coverage that goes beyond press releases, routine announcements and things like non-notable award nominations. I would say
355:
It lacks Corporate Depth, coverage are usual press and nothing substantial. Article has mentioned Angel.co, Crunchbase as a source which is like having Facebook profile for any company. At this time, it is not enough notable, in future it might become notable and at that time it should be part of
623:
Knowledge is not a platform for promotion or a Yellow Pages. While the references show that the company has engaged with press and has a functioning marketing department, there are no references that meet the criteria for establishing notability as per
218: 447:. Another independent article has been published in the last few days and cited. TBH, I don't have strong feelings about it, but it's notability is increasing so I'm leaning to keep. 524: 286: 212: 568: 266: 171: 488:
must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
404:
they are very nearly notable and AfD is a bit extreme. I vote to keep the the article with the proviso that it is DRAFT, giving time to establish notability.
577: 118: 103: 482:. Just about all of the references are based on PR and company announcements. There are 21 references in the article. Note that references must contain 63: 178: 550: 506: 339:
Why do you think the subject is non-notable? The article cites many reliable, independent sources that provide substantial coverage.
324: 68: 528: 98: 91: 17: 233: 144: 139: 200: 148: 131: 112: 108: 603: 590: 559: 515: 419: 494:) and articles explicitly marked as Press Releases which obviously fail the criteria for establishing notability: 651: 40: 194: 612: 58: 190: 647: 344: 320: 36: 634: 470: 456: 437: 393: 365: 348: 328: 298: 278: 258: 240: 73: 312: 135: 616: 581: 541: 519: 478:
Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability and the article suffers from
433: 376: 361: 294: 274: 254: 226: 53: 580:
is based on a company announcement of funding and has almost no information on the company, fails
479: 409: 127: 79: 527:
reference is based on a company announcement. Exact same quotes from Wang can be also seen in
466: 87: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
646:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
607: 598: 585: 572: 563: 554: 545: 532: 510: 501: 483: 386: 380: 340: 316: 206: 553:
is based on a company announcement and information from their website and interview, fails
625: 540:
reference only contains information on the company which was provided by a founder, fails
537: 594: 452: 429: 357: 290: 270: 250: 629: 405: 491: 165: 518:
of the product doesn't mention the company (the topic of this article) and fails
500:
is a listing in angel.co based on information provided by the company, fails
448: 497: 597:) and relies entirely on information provided by the company, fails 642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
593:
is based on a company announcement of funding (also covered in
422:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
615:
of the product has no information about the company, fails
356:
wikipedia for sure. Currently it does not hold that value.
571:
is more PR based on an interview with the Chairman, fails
309:
Does not need a Knowledge article. Seems to be a promo.
161: 157: 153: 225: 428:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 654:). No further edits should be made to this page. 490:Excluding Primary sources and blogs (which fail 287:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions 285:Note: This discussion has been included in the 265:Note: This discussion has been included in the 267:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 562:is based on an interview/announcement, fails 239: 8: 119:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 310: 284: 264: 509:interview with company founders fails 464:per additional sources added by Nurg.- 7: 606:is an interview with the CEO, fails 249:Clearly non-notable Notable PDF :) 24: 104:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 578:This from Tech (archived copy) 1: 525:ComputerWorld (archived copy) 94:(AfD)? Read these primers! 671: 628:. Topic fails GNG/NCORP. 438:01:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 394:10:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 366:09:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC) 349:21:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 329:14:33, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 299:06:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 279:06:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 259:06:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 644:Please do not modify it. 635:13:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC) 471:19:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 457:10:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC) 74:00:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 375:Typical startup. Fails 92:Articles for deletion 591:This from NZ Herald 560:This from NZ Herald 484:Independent Content 516:Life Hacker review 604:This is NZ Herald 440: 331: 315:comment added by 301: 281: 109:Guide to deletion 99:How to contribute 662: 469: 427: 425: 423: 391: 389: 244: 243: 229: 181: 169: 151: 89: 34: 670: 669: 665: 664: 663: 661: 660: 659: 658: 652:deletion review 569:Stuff reference 538:This TechInAsia 465: 441: 418: 416: 387: 385: 186: 177: 142: 126: 123: 86: 83: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 668: 666: 657: 656: 638: 637: 621: 620: 619: 610: 601: 588: 575: 566: 557: 548: 535: 529:this reference 522: 513: 504: 486:and therefore 473: 459: 426: 415: 414: 413: 397: 396: 369: 368: 352: 351: 333: 332: 303: 302: 282: 247: 246: 183: 122: 121: 116: 106: 101: 84: 82: 77: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 667: 655: 653: 649: 645: 640: 639: 636: 633: 632: 627: 622: 618: 614: 611: 609: 605: 602: 600: 596: 592: 589: 587: 583: 579: 576: 574: 570: 567: 565: 561: 558: 556: 552: 551:This from NBR 549: 547: 543: 539: 536: 534: 530: 526: 523: 521: 517: 514: 512: 508: 507:Tech Republic 505: 503: 499: 496: 495: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 474: 472: 468: 463: 460: 458: 454: 450: 446: 443: 442: 439: 435: 431: 424: 421: 411: 407: 402: 399: 398: 395: 392: 390: 382: 378: 374: 371: 370: 367: 363: 359: 354: 353: 350: 346: 342: 338: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 308: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 242: 238: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 192: 189: 188:Find sources: 184: 180: 176: 173: 167: 163: 159: 155: 150: 146: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 124: 120: 117: 114: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 96: 95: 93: 88: 81: 78: 76: 75: 72: 71: 67: 66: 62: 61: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 643: 641: 630: 617:WP:CORPDEPTH 582:WP:CORPDEPTH 542:WP:CORPDEPTH 520:WP:CORPDEPTH 487: 475: 461: 444: 417: 400: 384: 377:WP:CORPDEPTH 372: 336: 311:— Preceding 306: 248: 236: 230: 222: 215: 209: 203: 197: 187: 174: 85: 69: 64: 59: 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 613:This review 480:WP:CITEKILL 388:scope_creep 341:HenryCrun15 317:Ashishkafle 213:free images 595:this story 128:Kami (app) 80:Kami (app) 648:talk page 608:WP:ORGIND 599:WP:ORGIND 586:WP:ORGIND 573:WP:ORGIND 564:WP:ORGIND 555:WP:ORGIND 546:WP:ORGIND 533:WP:ORGIND 511:WP:ORGIND 502:WP:ORGIND 430:Barkeep49 381:WP:ORGIND 358:Light2021 291:Shellwood 271:Shellwood 251:Light2021 55:King of ♥ 37:talk page 650:or in a 631:HighKing 626:WP:NCORP 531:. Fails 420:Relisted 406:Kieran21 325:contribs 313:unsigned 172:View log 113:glossary 39:or in a 467:gadfium 337:Comment 219:WP refs 207:scholar 145:protect 140:history 90:New to 476:Delete 373:Delete 307:Delete 191:Google 149:delete 50:delete 492:WP:RS 234:JSTOR 195:books 179:Stats 166:views 158:watch 154:links 16:< 584:and 544:and 498:This 462:Keep 453:talk 449:Nurg 445:Keep 434:talk 410:talk 401:Keep 379:and 362:talk 345:talk 321:talk 295:talk 275:talk 255:talk 227:FENS 201:news 162:logs 136:talk 132:edit 241:TWL 170:– ( 455:) 436:) 383:. 364:) 347:) 327:) 323:• 297:) 289:. 277:) 269:. 257:) 221:) 164:| 160:| 156:| 152:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 52:. 451:( 432:( 412:) 408:( 360:( 343:( 319:( 293:( 273:( 253:( 245:) 237:· 231:· 223:· 216:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 193:( 185:( 182:) 175:· 168:) 130:( 115:) 111:( 70:♠ 65:♣ 60:♦

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
King of ♥



00:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kami (app)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Kami (app)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.