342:
I agree the argument is not crystal clear but in general if a scientific journal (or a major newspaper) publishes an obituary that removes the general issues of RS and it probably also means the person was notable based on the soft criteria. Here we have 2 obituaries. When in doubt I opt for keeping;
323:
Hmmm... For me, this doesn't completely settle the question of notability, but creates a more complex set of questions. According to both sources he was not a professional entomologist but an amateur hobbyist. That complicates things. I would like some opinions from other editors on how to handle
203:
259:
164:
279:
197:
96:
111:
400:
but (for most of its criteria) amateur status is irrelevant to that: it's about significance of scholarly contributions, not about job titles. —
343:
here the subject is dead, we can write a reasonable article and there is little chance of maintenance work as facts probably wont change. --
310:
which is enough to write an article. Also an obituary in a scholarly journal indicates notability but the argument is somewhat weak. --
91:
84:
17:
137:
132:
105:
101:
141:
218:
443:
185:
40:
124:
405:
374:. Being an amateur and not a professional would make him more notable, not less, but I can't see much on GS.
179:
62:
324:
someone who doesn't quite fit our traditional model for researchers. Thank you for finding these sources
239:
439:
307:
303:
36:
175:
426:
409:
383:
358:
337:
314:
291:
271:
251:
66:
379:
401:
344:
325:
311:
287:
267:
211:
235:
225:
58:
349:
Agreed, I am leaning more towards keep myself at this point based on recent comments by others.
422:
354:
333:
247:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
438:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
397:
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
393:
375:
128:
191:
283:
263:
418:
350:
329:
243:
158:
120:
72:
396:
and the two in-depth sources found by Hannes Röst. He doesn't appear to pass
434:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
260:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
154:
150:
146:
417:
per weak keepers. Agree amateur status is irrelevant.
210:
224:
234:Not clear that the subject meets the criteria at
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
446:). No further edits should be made to this page.
278:Note: This discussion has been included in the
258:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
280:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
277:
257:
328:. I am now on the fence with this one.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
302:this is pre-internet but I find
97:Introduction to deletion process
1:
427:14:30, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
410:22:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
384:22:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
359:18:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
338:22:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
315:15:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
67:05:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
463:
292:17:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
272:17:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
252:17:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
436:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
294:
274:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
454:
229:
228:
214:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
462:
461:
457:
456:
455:
453:
452:
451:
450:
444:deletion review
171:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
460:
458:
449:
448:
430:
429:
412:
402:David Eppstein
387:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
318:
317:
296:
295:
275:
232:
231:
168:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
459:
447:
445:
441:
437:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
369:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
304:this obituary
301:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
59:Ambrosiawater
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
435:
433:
414:
389:
371:
299:
240:WP:NACADEMIC
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
326:Hannes Röst
198:free images
376:Xxanthippe
121:Karl Bleyl
73:Karl Bleyl
440:talk page
415:Weak keep
390:Weak keep
300:weak keep
284:Shellwood
264:Shellwood
236:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
442:or in a
308:this bio
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
419:Johnbod
398:WP:PROF
372:Comment
351:4meter4
330:4meter4
244:4meter4
204:WP refs
192:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
394:WP:GNG
345:hroest
312:hroest
176:Google
142:delete
219:JSTOR
180:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
423:talk
406:talk
392:per
380:talk
355:talk
334:talk
306:and
288:talk
268:talk
248:talk
212:FENS
186:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
238:or
226:TWL
163:– (
425:)
408:)
382:)
357:)
336:)
290:)
282:.
270:)
262:.
250:)
242:.
206:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
52:.
421:(
404:(
386:.
378:(
353:(
332:(
286:(
266:(
246:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.