261:
in conjunction with it, and the fifth is a dead link that can't even be recovered via the
Wayback Machine to determine whether it did or didn't say anything noteworthy about Keith Carson either. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to contain much more
252:
notable than the norm for this level of office. But this is effectively written like a résumé, says nothing about him that would credibly support treating him like a special case of greater notability than most other county councillors, and isn't properly referenced: three of the five footnotes are
240:#2. As always, people at this level of government are not automatically entitled to have Knowledge articles just because they exist -- local officeholders have to pass a much higher burden of notability than just being technically verifiable, such as by writing and properly sourcing some genuine
198:
159:
283:
303:
192:
106:
262:
substance, and much better sourcing, than this. (Note also that the existence of this article was recently raised in another current AFD discussion as a
91:
257:
that are not support for notability at all, one is a news article that tangentially verifies a stray fact without actually mentioning Keith Carson
330:
and I could find no significant coverage in independent sources that showed why this person would be an exception. - 20:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
388:
132:
127:
136:
86:
79:
17:
213:
119:
180:
100:
96:
427:
406:
40:
254:
174:
380:
170:
423:
410:
393:
358:
315:
295:
275:
61:
36:
123:
402:
220:
206:
115:
67:
375:
345:
311:
291:
271:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
422:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
351:
186:
367:
337:
327:
237:
266:
argument for why a similarly bad article about one of his colleagues had to be kept.)
371:
341:
263:
229:
307:
287:
267:
233:
153:
53:
401:
not even close to meeting the inclusion criteria for politiicians.
418:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
232:
of an officeholder at the county level of government, not
248:
to demonstrate why they should be seen as significantly
149:
145:
141:
205:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
430:). No further edits should be made to this page.
302:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
282:Note: This discussion has been included in the
304:list of California-related deletion discussions
219:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
301:
281:
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
316:17:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
296:17:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
276:17:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
447:
411:16:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
394:22:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
359:00:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
62:11:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
420:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
326:. Per nominator. Fails
244:about their political
80:Articles for deletion
403:John Pack Lambert
318:
298:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
438:
391:
383:
356:
348:
234:reliably sourced
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
446:
445:
441:
440:
439:
437:
436:
435:
434:
428:deletion review
387:
379:
366:per nom, fails
352:
346:
255:primary sources
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
444:
442:
433:
432:
414:
413:
396:
361:
331:
320:
319:
299:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
443:
431:
429:
425:
421:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
392:
390:
384:
382:
377:
376:SportingFlyer
373:
369:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
349:
343:
339:
335:
332:
329:
325:
322:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
280:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
256:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
419:
417:
398:
386:
378:
363:
353:
333:
323:
258:
249:
246:significance
245:
241:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
116:Keith Carson
73:
68:Keith Carson
49:
47:
31:
28:
236:as passing
193:free images
424:talk page
242:substance
37:talk page
426:or in a
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
368:WP:NPOL
338:WP:NPOL
328:WP:NPOL
308:Bearcat
288:Bearcat
268:Bearcat
238:WP:NPOL
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
399:Delete
372:WP:GNG
364:Delete
342:WP:GNG
336:Fails
334:Delete
324:Delete
264:WP:WAX
259:at all
230:WP:BLP
171:Google
137:delete
54:Daniel
50:delete
354:SPEAK
347:KidAd
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
407:talk
340:and
312:talk
292:talk
272:talk
250:more
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
221:TWL
158:– (
409:)
374:.
370:,
350:•
344:.
314:)
306:.
294:)
286:.
274:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
405:(
389:C
385:·
381:T
310:(
290:(
270:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.