270:, as it is a list rather than a journalistic article. I.e. this could be proper citation, but is not in and of itself qualifying as notable. No other member of this list has an article solely based on their inclusion on the list, and only a handful have articles at all--if they do, the articles are for other reasons without mentioning this particular list. I don't see any other suggestions of notability to address.
399:
Authorial suspicions aside, cited references are not independent, reliable sources offering significant coverage of the subject, and the magazine lists and scholarships are selective but not significant honors in the
Knowledge sense. Search finds more coverage of a company that seems to have
277:. If we deleted the unsourced personal info/material, the article might be a stub, or less. If inclusion in Knowledge is warranted at all, a redirect to the "Other Work" section of the Ashton Kutcher article seems proper. DonGeiss (talk) 03:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC) (
208:
295:
have only made edits related to this article. The format of the names is oddly similar. It seems likely that these accounts are a) affiliated, and b) were created only to make this article.
312:
202:
161:
358:
377:
108:
93:
400:
attracted coverage only because Ashton
Kutcher was involved, and an unfortunate story about a family member in which subject is mentioned in passing.
168:
134:
129:
138:
292:
288:
260:
121:
243:; it is likely more appropriate to redirect to that page. Fulbright recipients don't seem to be notable in and of themselves: "
88:
81:
17:
223:
190:
102:
98:
334:
449:
184:
40:
273:
The lack of citations in the infobox and personal data give me pause about the authorship of the article re:
432:
409:
388:
369:
349:
324:
320:
304:
282:
180:
63:
125:
255:
contains a list of already notable recipients, which would make it tautological to say receipt satisfies
445:
428:
36:
230:
117:
69:
216:
405:
316:
300:
278:
420:
381:
362:
344:
274:
267:
256:
252:
248:
244:
77:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
196:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
424:
240:
401:
296:
53:
155:
423:. Notability is not inherited through association with a notable person.
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
287:
Additionally, the only two users to make edits to the article
337:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
266:
The regional Forbes article is insufficient to satisfy
151:
147:
143:
215:
343:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
313:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
452:). No further edits should be made to this page.
376:Note: This discussion has been included in the
357:Note: This discussion has been included in the
311:Note: This discussion has been included in the
239:Most of the citations seem to be articles about
359:list of New York-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
378:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
375:
356:
310:
7:
259:on its own. None of the criteria of
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
469:
419:Doesn't meet criteria for
64:22:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
433:11:46, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
410:22:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
389:20:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
370:20:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
350:20:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
325:03:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
305:03:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
283:20:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
261:WP:Notability_(academics)
442:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
391:
372:
352:
327:
263:are met, either.
253:Fulbright program
249:Fulbright program
245:Fulbright Scholar
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
460:
386:
367:
347:
342:
340:
338:
247:" redirects to "
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
79:
61:
34:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
456:
450:deletion review
382:
363:
353:
345:
333:
331:
176:
167:
132:
118:Kendall Dabaghi
116:
113:
76:
73:
70:Kendall Dabaghi
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
466:
464:
455:
454:
436:
435:
413:
412:
393:
392:
373:
341:
330:
329:
328:
241:Ashton Kutcher
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
453:
451:
447:
443:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
398:
395:
394:
390:
387:
385:
379:
374:
371:
368:
366:
360:
355:
354:
351:
348:
339:
336:
326:
322:
318:
317:Coolabahapple
314:
309:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
284:
280:
276:
271:
269:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
441:
439:
416:
396:
384:CAPTAIN RAJU
383:
365:CAPTAIN RAJU
364:
332:
286:
272:
265:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
58:
49:
47:
31:
28:
425:CoronaryKea
203:free images
421:WP:NOTABLE
293:HJones2579
289:Davisj5525
275:WP:BLPEDIT
268:WP:NOTABLE
257:WP:NOTABLE
446:talk page
37:talk page
448:or in a
402:Bakazaka
335:Relisted
297:DonGeiss
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
346:Lourdes
209:WP refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
417:Delete
397:Delete
181:Google
139:delete
50:delete
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
429:talk
406:talk
321:talk
301:talk
291:and
279:talk
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
54:ansh
251:."
231:TWL
160:– (
59:666
431:)
408:)
380:.
361:.
323:)
315:.
303:)
281:)
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
427:(
404:(
319:(
299:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.