145:
246:- the existence of a creature does not mean it should be included as an article (my nose definitely exists but if I create an article about my nose I should expect to see a CSD warning template appear on my talk page soon after). If notability cannot be ascertained, the article should be deleted.-
224:
issues: it is inevitably going to be difficult to find online references about a legendary creature of the folklore of West Africa. The limited references so far are sufficient, I think, to show that the legend exists; given the obscure subject matter, notability is rather more difficult to
339:
While the point about finding scholarly articles about this creature is valid, I'm concerned that it doesn't appear even notable among cryptids. The book referenced in the article actually quotes
77:
137:
193:
sources given: the
Mothman book, and an Italian newspaper article. They really say very little about this monster other than the name and the vague description. -
72:
17:
172:
285:
416:
397:
360:
328:
295:
261:
234:
202:
176:
56:
378:
is blog-like, and seems to be some sort of recounting by the author of
African experiences (first hand or otherwise, see
165:
104:
99:
434:
36:
108:
91:
433:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
230:
389:
356:
253:
282:
226:
95:
348:
412:
87:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
221:
324:
198:
384:
352:
320:
248:
375:
215:
156:
279:
289:
160:
408:
344:
49:
218:
125:
306:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
273:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
210:
Although there is very little information available on this legend, there are a
194:
313:
189:
under this title was speedied as a copyright violation. There are, in fact,
379:
351:. Without more verifiable information, how could this be a good article? --
374:
are blog entries or personal websites of very dubious reliability. Even
186:
347:, about this creature, and it is a very brief mention. Compare with
427:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
220:. However, I'm mainly hesitant to delete because of the
132:
121:
117:
113:
370:- all the online sources I found that cover the topic
311:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
278:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
185:. I made this stub after a prior article about a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
437:). No further edits should be made to this page.
78:Articles for deletion/Kikiyaon (2nd nomination)
8:
214:more references (of dubious reliability):
70:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
69:
24:
144:Google books shows only one ghit
73:Articles for deletion/Kikiyaon
1:
417:21:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
398:15:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
361:03:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
329:02:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
296:13:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
262:15:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
235:00:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
57:22:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
454:
203:13:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
177:07:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
430:Please do not modify it.
407:as appears non-notable.
155:reliable sources. Fails
32:Please do not modify it.
167:Otolemur crassicaudatus
68:AfDs for this article:
331:
327:
298:
445:
432:
394:
387:
319:
316:
310:
308:
277:
275:
258:
251:
168:
135:
129:
111:
54:
44:The result was
34:
453:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
443:
442:
441:
435:deletion review
428:
390:
385:
314:
304:
271:
254:
249:
195:Smerdis of Tlön
166:
131:
102:
86:
83:
66:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
451:
449:
440:
439:
422:
420:
419:
401:
400:
380:its index page
364:
363:
333:
332:
309:
301:
300:
299:
276:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
238:
237:
205:
142:
141:
82:
81:
80:
75:
67:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
450:
438:
436:
431:
425:
424:
423:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
402:
399:
396:
395:
393:
388:
381:
377:
373:
372:significantly
369:
366:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
307:
303:
302:
297:
294:
293:
292:
291:the Orphanage
287:
284:
281:
274:
270:
269:
263:
260:
259:
257:
252:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:systemic bias
219:
216:
213:
209:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
169:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
139:
134:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
76:
74:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
429:
426:
421:
404:
391:
383:
371:
367:
349:Nguma-monene
345:Darren Naish
340:
337:Weak delete.
336:
312:
305:
290:
288:
272:
255:
247:
243:
211:
207:
190:
182:
164:
152:
151:coverage in
148:
143:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
376:this source
225:ascertain.
149:significant
353:Mr. Vernon
325:count/logs
208:Weak keep.
280:Aervanath
409:MediaMob
343:author,
227:Terraxos
153:multiple
138:View log
88:Kikiyaon
63:Kikiyaon
341:another
244:Comment
187:cryptid
183:Comment
105:protect
100:history
52:JForget
405:Delete
386:Samuel
368:Delete
250:Samuel
133:delete
109:delete
46:Delete
315:Jerry
283:lives
157:WP:RS
147:, no
136:) – (
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
413:talk
357:talk
321:talk
231:talk
199:talk
173:talk
161:WP:N
159:and
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
392:Tan
382:).-
256:Tan
212:few
191:two
415:)
359:)
323:¤
286:in
233:)
217:,
201:)
175:)
163:.
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
48:--
411:(
355:(
229:(
197:(
171:(
140:)
130:(
128:)
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.