354:) means that a couple of sources (or 5, by my count at the moment) is insufficient to establish notability. Also, of the two online articles you've highlighted, the first names Kinfra almost as an aside in the last paragraph only and the second is very similar. I wouldn't class either articles, really, as "coverage" of Kinfra Apparel Park. There's a textiles factory in my hometown which has existed since the late 19th century. It certainly meets the historic criteria, being the only remnant of the town centre's industrial heritage, it's economically important as a major employer in the area, it is of architectural importance being one of few examples of Victorian architecture in town, and has received significant coverage from articles in the local and national papers to repeated mentions in books about the town and its history - I could probably dig up 40 reliable sources for an article. I wouldn't create one, though, because (much like this article, in my mind) those are all flimsy and tenuous justifications for something that just isn't noteworthy.
490:
appointments, these are neither significant nor in-depth. For this park to meet the criteria for notability, then there should exist references written by third-parties containing original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I can't find any. Topic fails GNG/NCORP/NBUILDING.
489:
for the same reasons - there are no references that contain
Independent Content, all of the content has been provided by the company or sources connected with the company. That's marketing and promotion folks! Other articles are mere mentions-in-passing such as reporting on water quality or
375:: As evident from available links, this is not a private company but a government establishment to bring in several apparel companies under one roof. The article has got valid citations and do not deserve to be deleted. Rather, the article could be expanded.
349:
I'd argue that "... commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." (from
79:
220:
330:
comments, but while I would like to see much more solid sourcing for the article content and do not want to overplay the sporadic coverage which I have identified, I think there is enough overall coverage for
74:
173:
214:
268:
180:
288:
478:
105:
457:
I came here as this AfD is listed under company/organization deletions, but this appears to be a business park and not a company. But then I notice that the
311:
120:
146:
141:
315:
150:
310:: The present article text is often promotional in tone, boasting of infrastructure links but omitting reported local concerns about water (
133:
541:
521:
496:
447:
417:
390:
363:
344:
299:
280:
260:
58:
382:
100:
93:
17:
235:
202:
114:
110:
426:
400:
474:
558:
40:
196:
322:
identified two further news sources (still accessible) plus a book study describing the project's development (in
469:
relies entirely on information provided by connected sources and therefore is not
Independent Content and fails
192:
461:
links to the KINFRA International
Apparel Parks Ltd website. Hmmm ... on the basis that this topic falls under
529:. Few mentions in passing, nothing that raises between rewritten press releases or routine events coverage. --
323:
137:
481:
are based on announcements and rely entirely on quotations/information provided by the company, also failing
359:
276:
256:
378:
242:
386:
486:
129:
64:
554:
517:
36:
228:
509:
482:
470:
351:
327:
466:
355:
272:
252:
208:
462:
535:
319:
292:
89:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
553:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
513:
505:
332:
411:
340:
318:). However article balance is a matter for clean-up rather than AfD. In the previous AfD,
438:
491:
531:
167:
251:
Non-noteworthy company. Entirely unreferenced. Does not appear to meet criteria.
336:
465:, not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. The
54:
326:). A case study does not in itself confer notability, and I note the
549:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:
429:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
403:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
314:), and without mentioning controversy about appointments (
80:
Articles for deletion/Kinfra
Apparel Park (2nd nomination)
324:"Selling to India's Consumer Market", Quorum Books, 1997
163:
159:
155:
227:
409:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -
435:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
241:
512:by every means. Needs more citations and rewrite
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
561:). No further edits should be made to this page.
485:. If we look at this topic as a place, it fails
287:Note: This discussion has been included in the
267:Note: This discussion has been included in the
269:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
8:
121:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
376:
289:list of India-related deletion discussions
286:
266:
75:Articles for deletion/Kinfra Apparel Park
72:
532:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
71:
24:
106:Introduction to deletion process
1:
418:18:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
391:04:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
364:18:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
345:08:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
300:07:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
281:06:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
261:06:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
59:10:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
542:13:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
522:10:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
497:14:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
448:09:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
96:(AfD)? Read these primers!
578:
551:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
479:The Hindu Business Line
70:AfDs for this article:
94:Articles for deletion
473:. The references in
316:Indian Express, 2016
312:Times of India, 2017
130:Kinfra Apparel Park
65:Kinfra Apparel Park
475:Financial Express
450:
446:
420:
393:
381:comment added by
302:
283:
111:Guide to deletion
101:How to contribute
569:
538:
445:
443:
436:
434:
432:
430:
416:
408:
406:
404:
297:
246:
245:
231:
183:
171:
153:
91:
34:
577:
576:
572:
571:
570:
568:
567:
566:
565:
559:deletion review
540:
536:
451:
439:
437:
425:
423:
421:
410:
399:
397:
293:
188:
179:
144:
128:
125:
88:
85:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
575:
573:
564:
563:
545:
544:
530:
524:
499:
467:Book Reference
433:
422:
407:
396:
395:
394:
369:
368:
367:
366:
304:
303:
284:
249:
248:
185:
124:
123:
118:
108:
103:
86:
84:
83:
82:
77:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
574:
562:
560:
556:
552:
547:
546:
543:
539:
533:
528:
525:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
495:
494:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
452:
449:
444:
442:
431:
428:
419:
415:
414:
405:
402:
392:
388:
384:
380:
374:
371:
370:
365:
361:
357:
356:Adam Black GB
353:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
305:
301:
298:
296:
290:
285:
282:
278:
274:
273:Adam Black GB
270:
265:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
253:Adam Black GB
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
190:Find sources:
186:
182:
178:
175:
169:
165:
161:
157:
152:
148:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
126:
122:
119:
116:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
98:
97:
95:
90:
81:
78:
76:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
550:
548:
526:
501:
492:
487:WP:NBUILDING
454:
440:
424:
412:
398:
383:183.90.36.50
377:— Preceding
372:
320:Phil Bridger
307:
295:CAPTAIN RAJU
294:
250:
238:
232:
224:
217:
211:
205:
199:
189:
176:
87:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
514:Catorce2016
504:This fails
215:free images
537:reply here
459:"homepage"
441:Sandstein
333:notability
555:talk page
510:WP:SIGCOV
483:WP:ORGIND
471:WP:ORGIND
352:WP:NBUILD
328:WP:NBUILD
308:Weak keep
37:talk page
557:or in a
493:HighKing
463:WP:NCORP
427:Relisted
401:Relisted
379:unsigned
174:View log
115:glossary
39:or in a
221:WP refs
209:scholar
147:protect
142:history
92:New to
527:Delete
506:WP:GNG
502:Delete
455:Delete
193:Google
151:delete
50:delete
413:Nahal
337:AllyD
236:JSTOR
197:books
181:Stats
168:views
160:watch
156:links
16:<
518:talk
508:and
477:and
387:talk
373:Keep
360:talk
341:talk
335:.
277:talk
257:talk
229:FENS
203:news
164:logs
138:talk
134:edit
55:Tone
243:TWL
172:– (
520:)
389:)
362:)
343:)
291:.
279:)
271:.
259:)
223:)
166:|
162:|
158:|
154:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
52:.
534:|
516:(
385:(
358:(
339:(
275:(
255:(
247:)
239:·
233:·
225:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
195:(
187:(
184:)
177:·
170:)
132:(
117:)
113:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.