Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/HD 95338 - Knowledge

Source 📝

598:
Does not currently meet notability criteria. Regarding the comment above of "2nd publication is virtually certain given solid observational evidence", the topic needs to establish notability based on current sources, not future ones. Cheers,
384:
discussion I'm unaware of that dictates otherwise. Initial analysis is that it seems like a very small amount of this should be smerged to the list with a possible spin-out later if multiple publications eventually end up providing SIGCOV.
453:
here would be to Userfy as one of your subpages in the interim until the criteria are met, you could continue to work on it there, and it saves you a later trip to refund. Material could still copied to the list as long as
216: 350:
that this should be deleted. Even assuming the preprint is published, this is only one published source and as far as I can tell there aren't anymore. Thus, this doesn't meet general notability criteria.
52:. I'm comfortable that there is a consensus to userfy the contents of the article taking into account that the concerns raised by those for deletion may be overcome in (hopefully not too much) time. 582: 498: 425: 254:. Now there is a preprint paper, not yet accepted for publication. Even accepting the preprint, notability is somewhat flimsy, presumably based on having a slightly odd planet. 317:
will be meet in future after 2nd publication. 2nd publication is virtually certain given solid observational evidence in preprint and somewhat anomalous nature of planet
169: 271: 210: 586: 502: 429: 116: 101: 543: 459: 386: 301:, but should notice the situation is typical for most newly discovered planetary systems, while i cannot find any criteria applicable to 176: 96: 89: 63: 17: 322: 142: 137: 231: 146: 110: 106: 198: 622: 129: 40: 377: 192: 618: 516: 369: 67: 36: 259: 188: 604: 590: 532: 506: 433: 360: 334: 282: 263: 224: 133: 71: 59: 446: 356: 310: 298: 251: 238: 520: 512: 343: 306: 275: 247: 125: 85: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
617:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
528: 330: 381: 347: 321:
mandating follow-up study in years to come. Formally, i.m.h.o. deletion proposal falls to
255: 600: 54: 204: 455: 450: 373: 352: 163: 576: 524: 492: 442: 419: 326: 346:
isn't the correct deletion criteria, I do agree with the general assertion of
613:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
159: 155: 151: 223: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 625:). No further edits should be made to this page. 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 250:. Prior to 2020, this star clearly didn't meet 449:controls and is not presently met. A possible 376:bar to inclusion there and an entry exists in 323:Knowledge:Overzealous_deletion#Article_quality 272:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions 237: 8: 297:contents do not meet notability criteria in 117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 269: 368:Is there a reason this has no entry at 523:, it may be ok. Waiting for consensus. 7: 583:2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D 499:2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D 426:2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D 445:it looks like everyone agrees that 24: 102:Introduction to deletion process 519:. Regarding proposal to userfy 372:? Doesn't seem like there's an 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 511:Thanks for noticing. Added 92:(AfD)? Read these primers! 642: 361:22:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC) 335:21:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 283:20:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 264:19:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 591:04:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 533:03:43, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 507:01:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 434:01:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 72:06:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC) 615:Please do not modify it. 313:notability criteria for 32:Please do not modify it. 542:per discussion above. 380:, unless there's some 378:Template:Stars of Vela 517:List of stars in Vela 370:List of stars in Vela 90:Articles for deletion 285: 107:Guide to deletion 97:How to contribute 633: 581: 575: 570: 569: 566: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 497: 491: 486: 485: 482: 479: 476: 473: 470: 467: 464: 458:was adhered to. 424: 418: 413: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 280: 242: 241: 227: 179: 167: 149: 87: 34: 641: 640: 636: 635: 634: 632: 631: 630: 629: 623:deletion review 579: 573: 571: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 545: 495: 489: 487: 483: 480: 477: 474: 471: 468: 465: 462: 461: 422: 416: 414: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 388: 276: 184: 175: 140: 124: 121: 84: 81: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 639: 637: 628: 627: 609: 608: 593: 544: 537: 536: 535: 509: 460: 387: 363: 337: 287: 286: 245: 244: 181: 120: 119: 114: 104: 99: 82: 80: 75: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 638: 626: 624: 620: 616: 611: 610: 606: 602: 597: 594: 592: 588: 584: 578: 572: 541: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 508: 504: 500: 494: 488: 457: 452: 448: 444: 440: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 421: 415: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 364: 362: 358: 354: 349: 345: 341: 338: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 293:I agree what 292: 289: 288: 284: 281: 279: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 240: 236: 233: 230: 226: 222: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 190: 187: 186:Find sources: 182: 178: 174: 171: 165: 161: 157: 153: 148: 144: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 122: 118: 115: 112: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 94: 93: 91: 86: 79: 76: 74: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 614: 612: 595: 539: 438: 365: 342:While maybe 339: 318: 314: 309:. Also, the 302: 294: 290: 278:CAPTAIN RAJU 277: 246: 234: 228: 220: 213: 207: 201: 195: 185: 172: 83: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 447:WP:NASTCRIT 311:WP:NASTCRIT 299:WP:NASTCRIT 252:WP:NASTCRIT 211:free images 348:Lithopsian 344:WP:TOOSOON 319:HD 95338 b 307:WP:TOOSOON 256:Lithopsian 248:WP:TOOSOON 619:talk page 601:1292simon 55:Callanecc 37:talk page 621:or in a 521:HD 95338 513:HD 95338 441:Pinging 439:Addendum 382:WP:ASTRO 353:Sam-2727 315:HD 95338 303:HD 95338 295:HD 95338 170:View log 126:HD 95338 111:glossary 78:HD 95338 64:contribs 39:or in a 515:to the 366:Comment 217:WP refs 205:scholar 143:protect 138:history 88:New to 596:Userfy 540:Userfy 525:Trurle 456:WP:CWW 451:WP:ATD 443:Trurle 374:WP:LSC 340:Delete 327:Trurle 325:case. 189:Google 147:delete 50:userfy 232:JSTOR 193:books 177:Stats 164:views 156:watch 152:links 16:< 605:talk 587:talk 529:talk 503:talk 430:talk 357:talk 331:talk 291:Keep 260:talk 225:FENS 199:news 160:logs 134:talk 130:edit 68:logs 60:talk 305:in 239:TWL 168:– ( 589:) 580:}} 577:UV 574:{{ 531:) 505:) 496:}} 493:UV 490:{{ 432:) 423:}} 420:UV 417:{{ 359:) 333:) 274:. 262:) 219:) 162:| 158:| 154:| 150:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 70:) 66:• 62:• 607:) 603:( 585:( 568:m 565:u 562:r 559:t 556:c 553:e 550:p 547:S 527:( 501:( 484:m 481:u 478:r 475:t 472:c 469:e 466:p 463:S 428:( 411:m 408:u 405:r 402:t 399:c 396:e 393:p 390:S 355:( 329:( 258:( 243:) 235:· 229:· 221:· 214:· 208:· 202:· 196:· 191:( 183:( 180:) 173:· 166:) 128:( 113:) 109:( 58:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Callanecc
talk
contribs
logs
06:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
HD 95338

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
HD 95338
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.