Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/HP Data Protector - Knowledge

Source 📝

234: 343:
I think it's possible to write an unbiased article about this subject during the 1990s, but the promotional and primary nature of all the sources available since makes this current article little more than a promo page. I will withdraw my nomination, delete all the promotional text, but stop short of
328:
See whether it is possible to use those sources to make the article better. Consider how in-depth they are. Cite the good ones in the article. And boldface the alternative article title so that the next editor along spots this more easily. ☺ The question that you have to answer for yourself is,
312:
After nominating this article, I tried searching "omniback" on google books and got lots of results. Omniback is described in the article as the previous name of this software, before 2004. I'm now thinking that this subject is only notable historically, under a name different than the title. What
202: 329:
on the basis of what you have found, whether you still want this entire edit history deleted; and whether it now seems possible to write a proper in-depth article from good in-depth sources.
196: 273: 163: 293: 253: 110: 233:
The sources included are either sponsored posts, primary sources, or articles where the topic is only mentioned in passing. The only good source is this:
95: 136: 131: 140: 123: 217: 90: 83: 17: 184: 236:, and it's from 1992. There is also a user guide on google books, but I don't think it's independent from the subject. 104: 100: 53: 178: 372: 40: 353: 338: 322: 305: 285: 265: 245: 65: 174: 127: 224: 368: 36: 210: 349: 318: 301: 281: 261: 241: 61: 190: 334: 119: 79: 71: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
367:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
345: 314: 297: 277: 257: 237: 57: 344:
rewriting a new article because I'm not very familiar with backup softwares at all.
330: 157: 363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153: 149: 145: 209: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 375:). No further edits should be made to this page. 292:Note: This discussion has been included in the 272:Note: This discussion has been included in the 252:Note: This discussion has been included in the 274:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 294:list of Software-related deletion discussions 254:list of Products-related deletion discussions 223: 8: 111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 291: 271: 251: 7: 24: 313:should we do in this situation? 96:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 86:(AfD)? Read these primers! 392: 354:18:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 339:12:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 323:05:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 306:04:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 286:04:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 266:04:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 246:04:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 66:18:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 52:. Nomination withdrawn. ( 365:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 84:Articles for deletion 308: 288: 268: 120:HP Data Protector 101:Guide to deletion 91:How to contribute 72:HP Data Protector 54:non-admin closure 383: 228: 227: 213: 161: 143: 81: 34: 391: 390: 386: 385: 384: 382: 381: 380: 379: 373:deletion review 170: 134: 118: 115: 78: 75: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 389: 387: 378: 377: 359: 358: 357: 356: 310: 309: 289: 269: 231: 230: 167: 114: 113: 108: 98: 93: 76: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 388: 376: 374: 370: 366: 361: 360: 355: 351: 347: 342: 341: 340: 336: 332: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 307: 303: 299: 295: 290: 287: 283: 279: 275: 270: 267: 263: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 235: 226: 222: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 176: 173: 172:Find sources: 168: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 116: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 85: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 364: 362: 311: 232: 220: 214: 206: 199: 193: 187: 181: 171: 77: 49: 47: 31: 28: 197:free images 50:speedy keep 369:talk page 37:talk page 371:or in a 346:Mottezen 315:Mottezen 298:Mottezen 278:Mottezen 258:Mottezen 238:Mottezen 164:View log 105:glossary 58:Mottezen 39:or in a 331:Uncle G 203:WP refs 191:scholar 137:protect 132:history 82:New to 175:Google 141:delete 218:JSTOR 179:books 158:views 150:watch 146:links 16:< 350:talk 335:talk 319:talk 302:talk 282:talk 262:talk 242:talk 211:FENS 185:news 154:logs 128:talk 124:edit 62:talk 225:TWL 162:– ( 352:) 337:) 321:) 304:) 296:. 284:) 276:. 264:) 256:. 244:) 205:) 156:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 64:) 56:) 348:( 333:( 317:( 300:( 280:( 260:( 240:( 229:) 221:· 215:· 207:· 200:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 177:( 169:( 166:) 160:) 122:( 107:) 103:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
non-admin closure
Mottezen
talk
18:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
HP Data Protector

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
HP Data Protector
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.