Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Howard McLeod - Knowledge

Source 📝

358:, but sometimes it is not so easy to sort the wheat from the chaff when an article has a deal of puffery. And is this really an endowed chair? The cited source, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy has "McLeod is a Fred Eshelman Distinguished Professor", from which one infers that there are multiple such professorships in the Eshelman School of Pharmacy. Are all chairs there endowed? How is one to know? 450:
C1 and C3 (at least). It wasn't immediately clear to me when nominated that the McLeod in the article matched the McCleod with the high citations, and given the other signs of promotionalism, I don't think it was unreasonable to run by AfD. (But it sounds like we all agree now that it's a better
420:
Thank you. I am in no way disputing that it is a clear keep on either C1 or C5, merely trying to explain that nominating this for AfD was not wholly unreasonable. I seem to spend more and more of my limited wiki time dealing with promotional content, and not enough creating new content, so one is
386:
he was "appointed the Fred Eshelman Distinguished Professor" at UNC, this passes NPROF#5 as distinguished professors pass. Like you, I also managed to miss the distinguished professor/chair in a first reading the article in the midst of the promotional text, however McLeod also ticks other NPROF
392:
is recent in depth coverage of a funding scandal). The article does need work on reducing puffery and including the 2020 coverage, the creation at the beginning of 2021 omitting this raises some questions - but in terms of AfD it is a pretty clear
203: 255: 234:
Typical promotional article, ref-bombed, yet lacking good secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Alas, I have no expertise in the subject area so will have to defer to others with regard to
387:
boxes that are easily checked (e.g. the citation record) - so I did not check other criteria too much after satisfying the first. There is also some in depth media coverage (e.g.
164: 275: 197: 390: 333:. If you're not willing to read or understand the relevant notability guideline you should not be creating deletion nominations in the subjects it covers. — 111: 96: 306:. He is a fellow of a number of organization, which may count for criteria #3, but I did not assess as this is a clear pass on citations.-- 421:
bound to be too hasty once in a while. And omitting the funding scandal is another indicator of the possibility of COI/paid editing.
388: 137: 132: 141: 91: 84: 17: 124: 218: 185: 62: 105: 101: 494: 40: 473: 456: 338: 179: 384: 303: 58: 477: 460: 430: 408: 367: 342: 321: 287: 267: 247: 175: 66: 490: 36: 329:. You see that "held a Fred Eshelman Endowed Chair" in the article as nominated? That means he passes 225: 469: 452: 355: 334: 283: 263: 235: 211: 128: 426: 402: 363: 315: 243: 80: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
489:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
191: 447: 299: 330: 279: 259: 54: 120: 72: 422: 417: 395: 378: 359: 308: 239: 158: 485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
256:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
154: 150: 146: 210: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 497:). No further edits should be made to this page. 274:Note: This discussion has been included in the 254:Note: This discussion has been included in the 276:list of Washington-related deletion discussions 224: 8: 112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 451:candidate for cleanup than for deletion.) 273: 253: 468:, due to a large number of citations. 7: 24: 97:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 478:21:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC) 461:13:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 431:10:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 409:06:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 67:00:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC) 368:21:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 343:15:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 322:10:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC) 288:21:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC) 268:21:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC) 248:20:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC) 87:(AfD)? Read these primers! 514: 487:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 85:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 59:Extraordinary Writ 290: 270: 102:Guide to deletion 92:How to contribute 57: 505: 398: 382: 311: 298:. Clear pass of 229: 228: 214: 162: 144: 82: 53: 34: 513: 512: 508: 507: 506: 504: 503: 502: 501: 495:deletion review 405: 396: 376: 318: 309: 304:citation record 171: 135: 119: 116: 79: 76: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 511: 509: 500: 499: 481: 480: 470:Jackattack1597 463: 453:Russ Woodroofe 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 412: 411: 403: 371: 370: 356:David Eppstein 346: 345: 335:David Eppstein 324: 316: 302:#C1 with this 292: 291: 271: 232: 231: 168: 115: 114: 109: 99: 94: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 510: 498: 496: 492: 488: 483: 482: 479: 475: 471: 467: 464: 462: 458: 454: 449: 445: 442: 441: 432: 428: 424: 419: 416: 415: 414: 413: 410: 406: 400: 399: 391: 389: 385: 380: 375: 374: 373: 372: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 350: 349: 348: 347: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 325: 323: 319: 313: 312: 305: 301: 297: 294: 293: 289: 285: 281: 277: 272: 269: 265: 261: 257: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 166: 160: 156: 152: 148: 143: 139: 134: 130: 126: 122: 121:Howard McLeod 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 86: 81: 74: 73:Howard McLeod 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 486: 484: 465: 443: 394: 354:Very sorry, 351: 326: 307: 295: 236:WP:NACADEMIC 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 78: 49: 47: 31: 28: 198:free images 331:WP:PROF#C5 491:talk page 280:Shellwood 260:Shellwood 37:talk page 493:or in a 448:WP:NPROF 300:WP:NPROF 165:View log 106:glossary 39:or in a 423:Edwardx 418:Eostrix 397:Eostrix 393:keep.-- 379:Edwardx 360:Edwardx 352:Comment 310:Eostrix 240:Edwardx 204:WP refs 192:scholar 138:protect 133:history 83:New to 404:hoot🦉 317:hoot🦉 176:Google 142:delete 219:JSTOR 180:books 159:views 151:watch 147:links 16:< 474:talk 466:Keep 457:talk 446:per 444:Keep 427:talk 383:per 364:talk 339:talk 327:Keep 296:Keep 284:talk 264:talk 244:talk 212:FENS 186:news 155:logs 129:talk 125:edit 63:talk 50:keep 226:TWL 163:– ( 476:) 459:) 429:) 407:) 366:) 341:) 320:) 286:) 278:. 266:) 258:. 246:) 238:. 206:) 157:| 153:| 149:| 145:| 140:| 136:| 131:| 127:| 65:) 52:. 472:( 455:( 425:( 401:( 381:: 377:@ 362:( 337:( 314:( 282:( 262:( 242:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 161:) 123:( 108:) 104:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Extraordinary Writ
talk
00:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Howard McLeod

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Howard McLeod
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.