Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Hohem - Knowledge

Source 📝

407: 289: 859:
Ordinarily I'd want to say the existence of lots of product users (and they seem to have a lot of users, even in google scholar results) would generate interest among encyclopedia users, and would want to see the article retained. The nominator's conclusion coverage is all bought-and-paid-for seems
578:
I deny the association you mentioned; my stance is solely based on Knowledge's preference for improving articles over deletion when objective facts are presented. I am merely stating facts without any bias. I adhere to all Knowledge rules, and if any evidence suggests that I have violated any
235:
Solid NCORP fail. Every single hit one can find on Googe is a PR piece obviously written or paid for by the company, as are all the references. Page author claims to be from NZ, but has this inexplicable interest in Chinese tech companies. No response to previous COI query on talk.
767:
You are just a university student in China, and you are still young. Please don't use your worldview to interpret this world, for it is vast. Just because you haven't seen a B2 bomber in China, does that mean you don't know of its existence? Thank you!
869:
rather than their products, that it doesn't seem that anyone cares about them as a company. I did a search for Chinese sources and only found one (aside from product reviews) that seems even close to significant coverage:
681:
1.Award Recognition: Hohem's receipt of prestigious awards like the Red Dot Design Award and iF Design Award provides significant, independent third-party recognition, meeting Knowledge's notability criteria.
880:
If someone can come up with additional reliable sources I'll reconsider my vote. But I don't see the value in an article that's basically a list of product releases and some uncited/primary-sourced text.
204: 684:
2.Independent Coverage: Information about these awards on the official Red Dot and iF Design websites serves as reliable, independent sources, essential for Knowledge's standards.
296: 161: 261: 257: 687:
3.Public Interest: The awards indicate Hohem's relevance and contribution to technology, aligning with Knowledge's goal of providing publicly interesting information.
198: 265: 108: 93: 534:
Yes, those would help; do you have any you can add, rather than simply restating policy to us (we're intimately familiar with AfD policy), thank you.
873:
A lengthy article in an independent source, more along the lines of earned media than a company-produced piece but still very reliant on the company
528: 473:. This company has received notable third-party recognition, including the Red Dot and IF Design Awards, which are significant in establishing its 951:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
424: 636: 253: 727: 305: 731: 584: 518: 335: 428: 88: 81: 17: 800:
If you believe that these rewards are relevant, you need to demonstrate that they have received independent coverage.
580: 514: 321: 165: 102: 98: 219: 822: 294:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
186: 976: 134: 129: 40: 564:
Moreover, have you used large language models such as ChatGPT in the process of drafting up your above comment?
138: 477:. These awards are independent of the company's self-published materials, adding to the article's credibility. 773: 723: 706: 674:
To argue for retaining the Hohem article on Knowledge based on significant coverage in third-party sources:
367: 121: 699: 972: 662: 36: 180: 874: 769: 719: 702: 658: 787: 758: 618:
due to lack of significant third-party coverage. I'll chance my vote if coverage can be demonstrated.
598: 569: 417: 351: 325: 273: 241: 912: 946: 916: 643: 539: 310: 212: 176: 906: 805: 623: 357: 288: 58: 548:
Are you, or are you not, the same person or affiliated in any manner with any of the following:
125: 959: 920: 890: 847: 809: 791: 777: 762: 745: 710: 666: 647: 627: 602: 588: 573: 543: 522: 277: 245: 63: 440: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
971:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
226: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
953:. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. 942: 934: 886: 949:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include 930: 783: 754: 594: 565: 269: 237: 753:
Please explain how, as an account with only one edit, you have managed to find this AfD.
695: 938: 639: 535: 504: 474: 954: 902: 801: 619: 444: 53: 691: 436: 385: 373: 341: 192: 406: 155: 320:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
882: 492: 740: 551: 838: 833:
We need to hear from more editors who are not socks or one edit accounts.
470: 117: 69: 638:. Not sure how much notability that adds, but it's one source... 967:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
400: 283: 825:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
635:: This product review has a by-line in a site that seems RS, 314:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 491:
This will strengthen the article's verifiability as per
432: 151: 147: 143: 211: 579:regulations, please feel free to block my account. 836:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 556:
The corporation that is the subject of this article
901:due to lack of independent third-party coverage. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 979:). No further edits should be made to this page. 252:Note: This discussion has been included in the 334:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 304:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has 225: 8: 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 489:Adding more independent, reliable sources: 308:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 251: 501:Removing or revising promotional content: 782:I am not a university student in China. 700:Hohem iSteady M6 phone gimbal - Ifdesign 657:Not enough reference to pass Notablity. 328:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 865:But there's so little on this company 947:in-depth information *on the company* 7: 696:Red Dot Design Award: Hohem iSteady 483:To enhance the article, I suggest: 24: 505:Knowledge's neutral point of view 929:This is a company therefore GNG/ 909:) 10:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 692:Red Dot Design Award: iSteady V2 405: 287: 256:lists for the following topics: 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 933:requires at least two deep or 1: 921:12:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 891:14:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 848:07:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 810:10:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 792:22:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 778:12:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 763:00:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 746:19:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 711:00:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 667:15:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC) 648:15:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 628:06:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 603:08:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 589:04:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 574:03:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 544:15:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 523:03:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 324:on the part of others and to 278:02:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 246:02:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 960:22:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC) 416:may incorporate text from a 64:03:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC) 445:the project page about this 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 996: 911:(duplicate !vote struck) 503:Ensuring compliance with 969:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 366:; accounts blocked for 336:single-purpose accounts 306:policies and guidelines 581:Loving This Mayweather 515:Loving This Mayweather 493:Knowledge's guidelines 166:edits since nomination 943:"Independent Content" 732:few or no other edits 82:Articles for deletion 734:outside this topic. 441:copyright violations 418:large language model 318:by counting votes. 297:not a majority vote 831:Relisting comment: 527:WP:SOCKSTRIKE per 850: 748: 735: 531: 462: 461: 399: 398: 395: 322:assume good faith 280: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 987: 846: 835: 828: 826: 744: 743: 736: 717: 526: 457: 454: 448: 435:claims that are 409: 401: 393: 381: 365: 349: 330: 300:, but instead a 291: 284: 254:deletion sorting 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 995: 994: 990: 989: 988: 986: 985: 984: 983: 977:deletion review 837: 821: 819: 739: 738: 469:the article on 458: 452: 449: 427:information or 423:It may include 422: 410: 383: 371: 355: 339: 326:sign your posts 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 993: 991: 982: 981: 963: 962: 894: 893: 878: 877: 876: 862: 861: 860:unsupportable. 853: 852: 834: 829: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 751: 750: 749: 688: 685: 682: 676: 675: 669: 651: 650: 630: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 562: 561: 560: 557: 554: 546: 511: 510: 509: 497: 460: 459: 413: 411: 404: 397: 396: 292: 282: 281: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 992: 980: 978: 974: 970: 965: 964: 961: 958: 957: 952: 948: 944: 940: 937:sources with 936: 932: 928: 925: 924: 923: 922: 918: 914: 910: 908: 904: 900: 892: 888: 884: 879: 875: 872: 871: 868: 864: 863: 858: 855: 854: 851: 849: 845: 843: 842: 832: 827: 824: 817: 811: 807: 803: 799: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 779: 775: 771: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 752: 747: 742: 733: 729: 725: 721: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 701: 697: 693: 689: 686: 683: 680: 679: 678: 677: 673: 670: 668: 664: 660: 656: 653: 652: 649: 645: 641: 637: 634: 631: 629: 625: 621: 617: 614: 613: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 577: 576: 575: 571: 567: 563: 558: 555: 553: 550: 549: 547: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 530: 525: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 506: 502: 498: 496: 494: 490: 486: 485: 484: 481: 480: 479: 478: 476: 472: 468: 456: 453:November 2023 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 420: 419: 414:This article 412: 408: 403: 402: 391: 387: 379: 375: 369: 363: 359: 353: 347: 343: 337: 333: 329: 327: 323: 317: 313: 312: 307: 303: 299: 298: 293: 290: 286: 285: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 968: 966: 955: 950: 926: 898: 896: 895: 867:as a company 866: 856: 840: 839: 830: 820: 818: 671: 654: 632: 615: 513: 500: 499: 488: 487: 482: 466: 464: 463: 450: 437:unverifiable 425:hallucinated 415: 389: 377: 368:sockpuppetry 361: 350:; suspected 345: 331: 319: 315: 309: 301: 295: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 941:containing 939:each source 935:significant 770:Pulebbbhngg 730:) has made 720:Pulebbbhngg 703:Pulebbbhngg 659:Bimanmandal 593:Thank you. 465:*I propose 199:free images 784:Fermiboson 755:Fermiboson 595:Fermiboson 566:Fermiboson 475:notability 429:references 302:discussion 270:Fermiboson 262:Technology 238:Fermiboson 973:talk page 913:Elemimele 640:Oaktree b 552:User:Voxl 536:Oaktree b 431:. Please 358:canvassed 352:canvassed 311:consensus 258:Companies 37:talk page 975:or in a 956:HighKing 945:showing 931:WP:NCORP 903:Cortador 823:Relisted 802:Cortador 728:contribs 620:Cortador 559:Kevin Xu 390:username 384:{{subst: 378:username 372:{{subst: 362:username 356:{{subst: 346:username 340:{{subst: 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 633:Comment 507:policy. 467:keeping 354:users: 264:, and 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 927:Delete 899:Delete 883:Oblivy 857:Delete 655:Delete 616:Delete 443:. See 433:remove 177:Google 139:delete 60:plicit 50:delete 741:A. B. 471:Hohem 332:Note: 266:China 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 118:Hohem 70:Hohem 16:< 917:talk 907:talk 887:talk 806:talk 788:talk 774:talk 759:talk 724:talk 707:talk 672:Keep 663:talk 644:talk 624:talk 599:talk 585:talk 570:talk 540:talk 529:This 519:talk 274:talk 242:talk 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 439:or 386:csp 382:or 374:csm 342:spa 316:not 227:TWL 160:– ( 52:‎. 919:) 889:) 844:iz 808:) 790:) 776:) 761:) 737:-- 726:• 718:— 709:) 698:3. 694:2. 690:1. 665:) 646:) 626:) 601:) 587:) 572:) 542:) 521:) 392:}} 380:}} 370:: 364:}} 348:}} 338:: 276:) 268:. 260:, 244:) 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 915:( 905:( 897:* 885:( 841:L 804:( 786:( 772:( 757:( 722:( 705:( 661:( 642:( 622:( 597:( 583:( 568:( 538:( 517:( 495:. 455:) 451:( 447:. 421:. 394:. 388:| 376:| 360:| 344:| 272:( 240:( 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
03:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Hohem

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Hohem
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.