Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Holeum - Knowledge

Source 📝

243:. These articles do talk about it, but both are from the same author, so it's not enough to get multiple independent sources. I did search a bit for papers mentioning the idea, and found plenty unpublished or published in predatory journals, but nothing else respectable. 200: 371:
per the above discussion. When the only reliable, independent sources that Google Scholar can turn up are unrelated geology papers thanks to OCR errors for "petroleum", it's a bad sign.
161: 351: 263: 194: 380: 108: 93: 246:
And come on, studying a gravitationally bound state of two microscopic black holes using Newtonian gravity and non-relativistic quantum mechanics?
336: 235:, lacking coverage in multiple independent sources. The article is mostly sourced to the authors themselves; the exceptions are 88: 81: 17: 306:), so the mathematical approach in this article (and the original paper!) are invalid, and we must instead use some theory of 294:-like state, Newtonian gravity plus non-relativistic QM would give a speed that is exactly one-half the speed of light and a 102: 98: 215: 182: 134: 129: 397: 138: 40: 331: 121: 241: 239: 393: 376: 356: 176: 36: 299: 319: 286:
per nom. The original paper also uses the inappropriate non-relativstic framework as well. For two
208: 172: 125: 58: 360: 342: 275: 255: 63: 222: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
392:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
372: 271: 251: 117: 69: 307: 310:
to understand this hypothetical system. No wonder the paper has only 9 citations. Fails
303: 315: 311: 238:, which merely cites the original paper in a long list without talking about it, and 232: 53: 188: 155: 295: 291: 287: 267: 247: 236: 388:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
290:
black holes (the conjectured smallest possible) in a bound
151: 147: 143: 207: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 400:). No further edits should be made to this page. 350:Note: This discussion has been included in the 262:Note: This discussion has been included in the 352:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions 221: 8: 264:list of Science-related deletion discussions 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 349: 261: 7: 24: 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 417: 381:17:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 361:15:42, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 343:14:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 276:09:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 256:09:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 64:03:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC) 390:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 302:of each black hole (2 82:Articles for deletion 300:Schwarzschild radius 363: 278: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 408: 359: 339: 334: 226: 225: 211: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 416: 415: 411: 410: 409: 407: 406: 405: 404: 398:deletion review 355: 337: 332: 308:quantum gravity 168: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 414: 412: 403: 402: 384: 383: 365: 364: 346: 345: 304:Planck lengths 280: 279: 229: 228: 165: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 413: 401: 399: 395: 391: 386: 385: 382: 378: 374: 370: 367: 366: 362: 358: 357:North America 353: 348: 347: 344: 340: 335: 329: 328: 325: 322: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 298:equal to the 297: 293: 289: 285: 282: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 260: 259: 258: 257: 253: 249: 244: 242: 240: 237: 234: 224: 220: 217: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 170:Find sources: 166: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 389: 387: 368: 326: 323: 320: 283: 245: 230: 218: 212: 204: 197: 191: 185: 179: 169: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 296:Bohr radius 292:positronium 288:Planck mass 195:free images 373:XOR'easter 394:talk page 37:talk page 396:or in a 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 321:Laundry 201:WP refs 189:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 369:Delete 316:WP:NEO 312:WP:GNG 284:Delete 268:Tercer 248:Tercer 233:WP:GNG 231:Fails 173:Google 139:delete 118:Holeum 70:Holeum 60:plicit 50:delete 324:Pizza 216:JSTOR 177:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 377:talk 314:and 272:talk 252:talk 209:FENS 183:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 318:. – 223:TWL 160:– ( 379:) 354:. 341:) 338:c̄ 327:03 274:) 266:. 254:) 203:) 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 52:. 375:( 333:d 330:( 270:( 250:( 227:) 219:· 213:· 205:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 180:· 175:( 167:( 164:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
03:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Holeum

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Holeum
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.