324:
sources. It credits "one finance industry professional who has dealt with
Horizons" and to "data compiled by Dealogic" saying that "Many of the deals are private and the size of many investments have not been disclosed. Horizons does not report its returns". Ms Chau refused an interview request. Another source is described as "One investor who knows Horizons". Yet more information is credited to "People who know Ms Chau". I'm not seeing enough reliable information that meet CORPDEPTH. The WSJ source is older from 2015 and is also focused on the people, Li Ka-shing and Ms. Chau who refused to be interviewed, as well as the topic company. The information provided about the topic company is little more that a recitation of various companies into which the topic company invested and some of their well-publicised exits. The quotes/information are provided by people affiliated with the company or companies they've invested in or alongside. Again, I just don't see any CORPDEPTH material on the topic company, just a lot of surface-level recitation of deals which were available on lots of websites such as crunchbase, dealroom, etc. Finally, since most of the information is already in the
965:), "China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing is a national, non-profit and industry social organization composed of enterprises, institutions and social groups in the logistics and procurement industry of the People's Republic of China. It is under the supervision of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council." The article discusses the significance and impact of Horizon Ventures' investments and the work of the two women who founded the company, which shows Horizon Ventures is independent of
995:
neither significant nor in-depth. Nor is it two full pages about the company as you've described, it is more accurate to say there are a couple of sentences on each of the pages that deal specifically with this company. In a similar vein, the brief mention in the book by O'Neill for a total of three sentences is neither significant nor in-depth. Finally, why do you say that the paper published in Issue 3 2014 of China
Securities Futures by Xu Xiaoyin (translator) Li Qiqi is about this topic company? You say that it
857:, "Chau founded venture powerhouse Horizons Ventures in 2002 with partner Debbie Chang Pui Vee. Li Ka-shing came in as a backer two years later." These sources are all independent of Li Ka-Shing. There is no evidence that they were "written in a manner and by somebody who wants to please Li Ka-Shing". Sources with a positive tone that are independent of the subject can be used to establish notability.
1019:. It is not surprising that the source discusses Horizons Ventures' investments in significant companies and that other sources do too as this is what is notable about the ocmpany. This does not mean the source is not independent. The inclusion of a map of the investments from the company does not mean the text is non-independent. I read through the company's website including pages like
879:
literally concludes a company possesses such depth if it's "possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization." A ridiculously low standard. And these sources are the best that can be found? By a wikipedian whose sourcing acumen is well respected? Write more than a very
323:
Hi, the FT article from June 2020 focuses a lot on Li Ka-shing (great name too) and "his" investments although the topic company is run by his long-term companion Ms. Chau. The article lists various companies in which the topic company invested in - but the article does not provide information on its
727:
Li Ka-Shing is notable, and the coverage of
Horizons Ventures on his page is adequate. Having two pages covering mostly the same material is unnecessary. Anyone looking for info on Horizons Ventures will be better off landing on his page, and there doesn't seem to be anything unique to differentiate
916:
guideline is the community consensus-backed standard even if you believe it is "a ridiculously low standard". The
Chinese-language sources contain plenty of information that is not in the Knowledge article, which at 157 words is already beyond a "very brief, incomplete stub". Editors' comments here
570:
From Google
Translate: "In the past five years, Horizons Ventures, Li Ka-shing's venture capital business, has been very active in investing in Israel. So far, it has invested in many of the country's most innovative companies, with a total of 24 investment projects. Among the projects supported by
994:
by Feng provides a standard description of the company on page 504 complete with a map/diagram taken from the topic company's website and on page 505 lists some of the investments - the exact same information from the websiate and the same as that which we've seen in multiple other articles. It is
490:
From Google
Translate: "Behind a series of success stories in the global high-tech industry is a common investor, a venture capital firm founded by two Hong Kong women. The company serves as a vehicle for personal investment, and is associated with some of the biggest names in tech, such as skYPe,
529:
From Google
Translate: "Recently, Li Ka-shing's venture capital fund, Horizons Ventures, provided US$ 15.5 million in funding to Hampton Creek, an American food technology company that produces artificial eggs, causing concern. Focusing on "frontier" industries and "radical" investment strategies
607:
From Google
Translate: "In this regard, Hong Kong also has such a master of venture capital profits - Li Ka-shing. "Horizons Ventures", founded by Li Ka-shing, has invested in a number of innovation and technology companies, and has achieved outstanding results. In 2007, "Horizons Ventures" also
452:
From Google
Translate: "Horizons Ventures has achieved great success, especially in 2007, Horizons Ventures invested in Facebook twice, totaling US$ 120 million. Afterwards, Facebook went public, and Horizons Ventures gained 5 times the return on investment, and became famous in one fell swoop.
749:
I have the utmost respect for User:Cunard's abilities to find sources, as I hope they're aware. I'll confess I'm often persuaded to !vote keep by sources Cunard presents during formal procedures. I'm sure that's partially because we share similar views on notability and verifiability, and I'm
661:
call on us to "consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education." This one does not seem to, and follows the common "in business, raised money" template I mention in
874:
Excuse me for reading "long term companion" in the WSJ source and not drawing the conclusion she is totally independent of her business "partner". Are you reading what you just wrote? The standard of corporate depth may be met in a two page book mention? Really?
999:. Perhaps you've mistaken the reference or something because the article journal you've linked to appears to not even mention the topic company, focussed instead on a different firm "Victoria Harbour Investment" which is another Li Ka-shing investment vehicle.
1014:
provides detailed analysis about the company's history on two pages. If translated from
Chinese into English using Google Translate, the text about the company would amount to over 500 English words, which is very substantial coverage that meets
917:
dissuade me from investing time into improving the article which could still get deleted after it is improved. I will limit my response to this as discussing this further would make this an even more unpleasant experience for me.
608:
invested 120 million US dollars in Facebook. When Facebook went public five years later, it was estimated that it had obtained a return of at least 5 times. In recent years, Li Ka-shing's fund has invested in the entire."
657:. This again. It doesn't matter how much money is invested, how much money the company shovels around, who its partners are, or which analysts want to price its stock. This article is a perma-stub. The criteria at
754:
business news articles, to my limited ability to read them. I performed a reasonable BEFORE and I'm not seeing anything in English sources which reads differently than the summaries of Cunard's translated quotations.
209:
448:
The book discusses Horizons Ventures on pages 504–505. The book notes on page 505: "維港投資取得了很大的成功,特別是 2007 年,維港投資先後兩次投資於 Facebook,共計 1.2 億美元。其後 Facebook 上市,維港投資獲得 5 倍的投資回報,一舉成名。不過,維港投資最成功的項目,是投資於視頻會議工具 Zoom。 ...
816:
I'm willing to amend my comment to "routine business coverage." This is a company that has acquired capital and invested wisely. Good for them. One of the two women who founded the company happens to be the
728:
this venture capital firm from hundreds of other non-notable venture capital firms, which is probably why none of the media coverage actually focuses on the firm itself, beyond passing mentions.
56:. Rough consensus is that the sources found by Cunard don't establish notability because they are routine business reporting, but that a redirect is a sensible alternative to deletion.
997:
discusses the significance and impact of Horizon Ventures' investments and the work of the two women who founded the company, which shows Horizon Ventures is independent of Li Ka-Shing
839:
Horizons Ventures received two pages of coverage in a book that discusses the company's history and significance. How is this "routine business coverage" and how does this not meet
275:
961:, an academic journal of securities and futures published by the China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing. From a Google Translate of the federation's Knowledge article (
240:
None of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability and anything I find is related either to an announcement or one of their investments or an interview.
203:
1065:
633:
279:
254:
166:
908:
I cannot believe my comments would provoke such a hurtful response infused with hostility at me. You called two pages of coverage "a two page book mention" and
962:
771:
is well covered and his foundation gets him more wiki-ink, but given the breadth of this fellow's activities, I don't even think this company is notable to
567:
The book notes: "過去 5 年,李嘉誠旗下風險投資業務「維港投資」(Horizons Ventures)在以色列的投資活動非常活躍,迄今已向該國不少最具創新活力的企業投放資金,投資案共達 24 項。在維港投資所支持的項目裡,其中一個最成功的案例,是一家 GPS 導航的地圖軟件公司「Waze」。"
113:
98:
821:"long term companion" of the "30th richest man in the world." Totally independent? Not so much. IMHO, everything I'm reading about Horizons Ventures
487:
The abstract notes: "全球高科技产业一系列成功故事的背后部有一个共同的投资者，那就是由两位香港女性创立的一家风投公司。该公司作为个人投资的工具，skYPe、Facebook、Spotify、Waze、Siri、DeepMind和Summly等科技界响当当的大名无不与之相关。"
604:
The book notes: "在這方面,香港也有這樣的創投獲利高手—李嘉誠。李嘉誠創辦的「維港投資」,投資多個創科公司,成績亦相當彪炳。「維港投資」於2007年,亦有向facebook投資1.2億美元,5年後Facebook上市時,估計獲得了最少5倍的回報。近年,李嘉誠旗下基金投資了全."
613:
409:
271:
1117:
972:
To say that these book and academic journal sources are "'by the numbers' reporting" or "routine business news articles" is very inaccurate.
586:
549:
430:
139:
134:
143:
1076:. This will allow a selective merge of the content as well as the redirect to be undone if more reliable sources are found in the future.
526:
The abstract notes: "正近日,李嘉诚旗下的创投基金维港投资,向生产人造鸡蛋的美国食品科技公司Hampton Creek,提供1550万美元资金,引起关注。关注"前沿"产业,"激进"的投资策略,一向是维港的风格。而其实际执掌者,便是李嘉诚的亲密伙伴周凯旋"
497:
1027:
and could not verify that the text of the book is based on the website. If translated from Chinese into English using Google Translate,
126:
302:
1131:
880:
brief, incomplete stub on this subject and I'll concede depth. Everything I'm able to see in sources is already in the article.
224:
93:
86:
17:
944:
The editors who supported deletion have not refuted the significant coverage about the company in several books (two pages in
459:
191:
1089:
617:
453:
However, the most successful project of Horizons Ventures's investment is to invest in the video conferencing tool Zoom. ..."
1035:
is about Horizons Ventures. The paper has "维港投资" in the title, which corresponds with the Chinese characters in the logo of
1145:
1103:
799:
625:
530:
have always been the style of Horizons Ventures. The actual person in charge is Li Ka-shing's close partner Zhou Kaixuan"
170:
107:
103:
825:
seems to be written in a manner and by somebody who wants to please Li Ka-Shing. Just not seeing corporate depth.
711:
690:
636:, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
505:
376:
345:
185:
1230:
1153:
1111:
1073:
675:
40:
1211:
1197:
1186:
1167:
1049:
1005:
981:
926:
903:
889:
868:
834:
811:
784:
737:
717:
679:
646:
396:
365:
334:
314:
288:
263:
246:
68:
181:
1039:. "Victoria Harbour Investment" is what Google Translate translates the Chinese name of Horizons Ventures to.
853:
is a business partner of Li Ka-Shing. She is not the "partner" of him which has a different meaning. From
670:'s frequent argument that "by the numbers" reporting on these kinds of companies establishes notability.
571:
Horizons Ventures, one of the most successful cases is "Waze", a map software company for GPS navigation."
130:
802:), how is coverage in two book sources and an academic journal article "routine business news articles"?
231:
1226:
1207:
1125:
733:
706:
36:
1107:
671:
1016:
913:
909:
876:
844:
840:
217:
298:
1159:
1083:
1041:
973:
918:
860:
803:
667:
638:
391:
197:
1182:
1139:
1097:
899:
885:
830:
793:
780:
663:
583:
546:
536:
509:
467:
427:
417:
310:
122:
82:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1225:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1031:
would provide at least 250 words about the company, which is significant coverage. The paper
577:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1203:
1163:
1121:
1045:
977:
922:
864:
807:
729:
642:
542:
423:
658:
912:"a ridiculously low standard". Two pages of coverage in a book is not a "mention". The
59:
474:
1192:
1079:
1072:(with the history preserved under the redirect), where the company is mentioned, per
1000:
386:
329:
283:
258:
241:
1191:
I agree, on reflection, a redirect as suggested is a better option, thanks Cunard.
1178:
1135:
1093:
895:
881:
826:
789:
776:
598:
561:
442:
306:
1068:
that should have a standalone article. I as a second choice support a redirect to
160:
750:
inclined to support such views. In this case, they have presented us a series of
1149:
1069:
966:
850:
768:
325:
53:
1020:
854:
470:
1024:
356:
701:
3rd only because it's unclear whether Cunard's have been fully reviewed
1066:
Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria
1036:
634:
Knowledge:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria
301:
wouldn't count towards establishing notability? In addition, found
520:
1221:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1064:
I maintain that Horizons Ventures is a notable company under
693:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
379:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
348:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
328:
article I would not be against a redirect to there instead.
843:? If two pages of coverage in a book is not enough to meet
767:
from multiple reliable sources independent of the subject.
1177:
I could go along with a redirect as suggested by Cunard.
156:
152:
148:
1152:(with the history preserved under the redirect) as an
216:
491:
Facebook, Spotify, Waze, Siri, DeepMind, and Summly."
408:
per the significant coverage in multiple independent
704:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
385:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
1074:Knowledge:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1233:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1010:I don't agree with the analysis of the sources.
270:Note: This discussion has been included in the
253:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
230:
8:
114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
1021:https://www.horizonsventures.com/portfolio/
855:https://www.forbes.com/profile/solina-chau/
576:Xiao, Tengyuan 驍騰原; Pan, Qicai 潘啟才 (2017).
305:. Not ready to vote yet, but leaning keep.
269:
252:
992:Hong Kong Chinese Consortium (1841–2020)
1028:
949:
765:significant coverage directly detailing
1025:https://www.horizonsventures.com/news/
458:Xu, Xiaoyin 徐笑音; Li, Qiqi 李其奇 (2014).
7:
1032:
1011:
954:
945:
1150:Li Ka-shing#Internet and technology
1148:), would you support a redirect to
1070:Li Ka-shing#Internet and technology
54:Li Ka-shing#Internet and technology
24:
1037:http://www.horizonsventures.com/
612:There is sufficient coverage in
274:lists for the following topics:
99:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
666:. I vehemently disagree with
629:
621:
582:(in Chinese). Taipei: 真源有限公司.
1:
1202:Definitely, it's a good idea.
506:Nanfang Daily Newspaper Group
849:Horizons Venture co-founder
616:to allow Horizons Ventures (
948:and multiple paragraphs in
894:Sorry if I lost my temper.
759:the company is verifiable;
89:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1250:
1212:06:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
1198:15:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
1187:09:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
1168:09:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
1050:09:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
1006:21:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
416:Feng, Bangyan 馮邦彥 (2020).
303:in depth coverage from WSJ
69:12:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
982:00:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
927:05:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
904:15:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
890:09:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
869:02:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
835:01:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
812:00:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
785:21:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
738:10:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
718:02:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
680:23:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
647:07:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
541:(in Chinese). Hong Kong:
534:
496:Lin, Xing'an 林星安 (2014).
422:(in Chinese). Hong Kong:
397:23:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
366:23:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
1223:Please do not modify it.
335:21:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
315:16:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
289:15:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
264:15:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
247:15:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
1154:alternative to deletion
847:, what would be enough?
535:O'Neill, Mark (2018).
297:Can you expand on why
171:edits since nomination
87:Articles for deletion
618:traditional Chinese
763:the subject lacks
699:Relisting comment:
626:simplified Chinese
466:(in Chinese) (3).
419:香港華資財團 (1841–2020)
720:
588:978-988-77-3095-8
551:978-962-04-4296-4
432:978-962-04-4706-8
399:
368:
291:
266:
123:Horizons Ventures
104:Guide to deletion
94:How to contribute
75:Horizons Ventures
67:
1241:
1033:Xu & Li 2014
957:is published in
955:Xu & Li 2014
716:
714:
709:
703:
696:
694:
631:
623:
614:reliable sources
602:
596:
595:
565:
559:
558:
543:Joint Publishing
524:
518:
517:
508:. Archived from
498:"周凯旋:李嘉诚的"另类投资""
485:
483:
482:
473:. Archived from
446:
440:
439:
424:Joint Publishing
410:reliable sources
394:
389:
384:
382:
380:
364:
353:
351:
349:
272:deletion sorting
235:
234:
220:
164:
146:
84:
66:
64:
57:
34:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1231:deletion review
1108:Falcon Kirtaran
712:
707:
705:
689:
687:
593:
591:
589:
575:
556:
554:
552:
515:
513:
495:
480:
478:
457:
437:
435:
433:
426:. pp. 504–505.
415:
392:
387:
375:
373:
355:
344:
342:
177:
137:
121:
118:
81:
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1247:
1245:
1236:
1235:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1200:
1189:
1172:
1171:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
906:
743:
742:
741:
740:
702:
697:
683:
682:
651:
650:
611:
610:
587:
573:
550:
532:
504:(in Chinese).
493:
455:
431:
402:
401:
383:
370:
352:
339:
338:
337:
318:
317:
292:
267:
238:
237:
174:
117:
116:
111:
101:
96:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1246:
1234:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1219:
1218:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1190:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
1003:
998:
993:
989:
986:
985:
984:
983:
979:
975:
970:
968:
964:
963:zh:中国物流与采购联合会
960:
956:
951:
947:
943:
940:
928:
924:
920:
915:
911:
907:
905:
901:
897:
893:
892:
891:
887:
883:
878:
873:
872:
871:
870:
866:
862:
858:
856:
852:
846:
842:
838:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
815:
814:
813:
809:
805:
801:
798:
795:
791:
788:
787:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
753:
748:
745:
744:
739:
735:
731:
726:
723:
722:
721:
719:
715:
710:
700:
695:
692:
685:
684:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
660:
656:
653:
652:
649:
648:
644:
640:
635:
627:
619:
615:
609:
605:
600:
590:
585:
581:
580:
574:
572:
568:
563:
553:
548:
544:
540:
539:
533:
531:
527:
522:
512:on 2022-07-25
511:
507:
503:
499:
494:
492:
488:
477:on 2022-07-25
476:
472:
469:
465:
461:
456:
454:
450:
444:
434:
429:
425:
421:
420:
414:
413:
411:
407:
404:
403:
400:
398:
395:
390:
381:
378:
371:
369:
367:
363:
361:
360:
350:
347:
340:
336:
333:
332:
327:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
287:
286:
281:
277:
276:Organizations
273:
268:
265:
262:
261:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
244:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
172:
168:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
115:
112:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1222:
1220:
1193:
1158:
1142:
1128:
1114:
1100:
1086:
1077:
1061:
1040:
1029:O'Neill 2018
1017:WP:CORPDEPTH
1001:
996:
991:
987:
971:
958:
953:
950:O'Neill 2018
941:
914:WP:CORPDEPTH
910:WP:CORPDEPTH
877:WP:CORPDEPTH
859:
848:
845:WP:CORPDEPTH
841:WP:CORPDEPTH
822:
818:
796:
772:
764:
760:
756:
751:
746:
724:
698:
688:
686:
654:
637:
606:
603:
599:Google Books
592:. Retrieved
578:
569:
566:
562:Google Books
555:. Retrieved
537:
528:
525:
514:. Retrieved
510:the original
501:
489:
486:
479:. Retrieved
475:the original
463:
451:
447:
443:Google Books
436:. Retrieved
418:
405:
374:
372:
358:
357:
343:
341:
330:
294:
284:
259:
242:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
80:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1204:Chagropango
1122:Chagropango
967:Li Ka-Shing
851:Solina Chau
769:Li Ka-Shing
730:Chagropango
713:Mississippi
668:User:Cunard
538:異地吾鄉︰猶太人與中國
326:Li Ka-shing
204:free images
664:WP:SERIESA
632:) to pass
594:2022-07-25
557:2022-07-25
545:. p. 281.
516:2022-07-25
481:2022-07-25
460:"维港投资和李嘉诚"
438:2022-07-25
62:Sandstein
1227:talk page
1012:Feng 2020
990:The book
946:Feng 2020
819:"partner"
471:1008-0651
280:Hong Kong
37:talk page
1229:or in a
1194:HighKing
1146:contribs
1132:contribs
1118:contribs
1104:contribs
1090:contribs
1080:HighKing
1078:Pinging
1062:Comment:
1002:HighKing
988:Response
942:Comment:
800:contribs
691:Relisted
659:WP:NCORP
502:21世纪商业评论
377:Relisted
346:Relisted
331:HighKing
285:HighKing
260:HighKing
243:HighKing
167:View log
108:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
1179:BusterD
1136:BusterD
1134:), and
1094:Pegnawl
896:BusterD
882:BusterD
827:BusterD
790:BusterD
777:BusterD
752:routine
725:Delete.
672:FalconK
307:Pegnawl
295:Comment
210:WP refs
198:scholar
140:protect
135:history
85:New to
1160:Cunard
1042:Cunard
974:Cunard
959:中国证券期货
919:Cunard
861:Cunard
804:Cunard
747:Delete
655:Delete
639:Cunard
597:– via
579:憩富發達指南
560:– via
519:– via
464:中国证券期货
441:– via
393:plicit
299:the FT
182:Google
144:delete
630:维港投资技
225:JSTOR
186:books
161:views
153:watch
149:links
16:<
1208:talk
1183:talk
1164:talk
1140:talk
1126:talk
1112:talk
1098:talk
1084:talk
1046:talk
1023:and
978:talk
923:talk
900:talk
886:talk
865:talk
831:talk
808:talk
794:talk
781:talk
734:talk
708:Star
676:talk
643:talk
622:維港投資
584:ISBN
547:ISBN
521:CNKI
468:ISSN
428:ISBN
406:Keep
311:talk
278:and
218:FENS
192:news
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
1120:),
1106:),
1092:),
773:him
757:Yes
232:TWL
165:– (
52:to
1210:)
1185:)
1166:)
1048:)
980:)
952:).
925:)
902:)
888:)
867:)
833:)
823:is
810:)
783:)
775:.
761:No
736:)
678:)
645:)
628::
624:;
620::
500:.
462:.
362:iz
313:)
282:.
257:.
212:)
169:|
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
1206:(
1181:(
1162:(
1156:?
1143:·
1138:(
1129:·
1124:(
1115:·
1110:(
1101:·
1096:(
1087:·
1082:(
1044:(
976:(
969:.
921:(
898:(
884:(
863:(
829:(
806:(
797:·
792:(
779:(
732:(
674:(
641:(
601:.
564:.
523:.
484:.
449:"
445:.
412:.
388:✗
359:L
309:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
163:)
125:(
110:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.