285:
third ref is a journal publication from ~100 years ago. Which doesn't include the term 'HeartSpeak' anywhere in its pages. Not to mind supporting the other claims made in this overtly promotional opening sentence. And, how could it, given that the advert which is offered as the first ref, states that
351:
Its previous deletions don't really matter in so much as they just show someone is determined to have this topic be included which is why this article is in an area under DS but doesn't actually address its notability or lack there of. However in this case, it should be
206:
369:
Am I allowed to do this after shenanigans have been officially declared? I've called shenanigans quite a few times myself but I am on untrod ground when it comes to them having been officially declared
311:
331:
159:
200:
91:
106:
244:
previously. The recreated material is as problematic now as when it was at the time of those previous deletions. Namely that it still falls short of
282:
website. And, if that weren't disqualifying enough, the 'definition' offered by Urban
Dictionary has nothing to do with the subject in question here
166:
86:
79:
17:
132:
127:
100:
96:
136:
221:
385:
188:
40:
119:
263:
By way of elaboration on my concerns on GNG/RS, I would note that, of the three "references" offered to support the
286:'HeartSpeak' was developed some time in the last ~25 years. (Unless the author of this 1920s journal article,
182:
381:
36:
178:
365:
343:
323:
303:
237:
Overtly promotional article. The substance of which is a recreation of content which has been deleted
61:
339:
319:
299:
123:
361:
287:
214:
228:
245:
115:
67:
356:. This alternative medicine topic lacks any SNG or GNG criteria by which it is notable. Best,
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
380:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
257:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
279:
249:
335:
315:
295:
272:
194:
357:
57:
153:
290:
was professor of timetravel (as well as psychology), this just doesn't stand up.)
53:
271:
first "ref" is an obvious advert for the subject and doesn't meet
376:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
241:
238:
260:
overtones here are also more than a little disquieting.
312:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
264:
253:
149:
145:
141:
213:
227:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
388:). No further edits should be made to this page.
330:Note: This discussion has been included in the
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:second is Urban Dictionary for goodness sake. A
332:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
329:
309:
252:and related guidelines. The apparent
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
294:I officially declare shenanigans.
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
265:promotional text in the opening
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
405:
378:Please do not modify it.
366:03:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
344:02:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
324:02:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
304:02:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
62:03:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
254:multiaccount abuse
370:
346:
326:
275:by a country mile
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
396:
368:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
404:
403:
399:
398:
397:
395:
394:
393:
392:
386:deletion review
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
402:
400:
391:
390:
372:
371:
348:
347:
327:
292:
291:
283:
276:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
401:
389:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
307:
306:
305:
301:
297:
289:
284:
281:
277:
274:
270:
269:
268:
266:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
377:
375:
353:
293:
262:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
201:free images
336:Guliolopez
316:Guliolopez
296:Guliolopez
116:HeartSpeak
68:HeartSpeak
382:talk page
358:Barkeep49
288:JR Kantor
37:talk page
384:or in a
246:WP:PROMO
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
354:deleted
267:, the:
258:WP:PAID
239:several
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
280:WP:UGC
256:, and
250:WP:GNG
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
273:WP:RS
242:times
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
362:talk
340:talk
320:talk
300:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
54:ST47
229:TWL
158:– (
364:)
342:)
334:.
322:)
314:.
302:)
248:,
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
360:(
338:(
318:(
298:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.