533:- While we tend to treat gerontology-driven Bio with kid gloves, the fact that the Freikorps was a broad alliance of right wing/nationalist paramilitaries rather than a single outfit does degrade the notability hook of this biography. This is additionally defective in the way BLP-1E rules articles on living people defective: an ordinary individual with the accidental fact of having lived a long time. There is a rational keep argument to be made, but I'm non the other side of the fence myself...
247:
a veteran of WWI (that's the reason why the awkward construction "last Worl War I era veteran" is used), he was an orchestra musician (first flautist of one of the most famous German orchestras) but I haven't been able to dig up much on the web about possible solo performances, he was active from the
447:
notable unit. It was a large group of organisations that defined an era and was involved in what was effectively a civil war. Bit of a difference. I think the last surviving veteran of the SA or the SS might be considered notable, don't you? Same thing. --
52:. The consensus below is that being the last surviving Friekorps veteran is not a sufficient claim to notability and that the available sources do not support notability on any alternative bases (such as for his musical career).
168:
248:
1920s to the 1970s, definitely pre-internet. Also, the death date is OR, it may be true, but no source found yet, only some Wiki mirrors. Also his name was spelled "Helmuth" (according to the newspapers).
211:. Being the "last known German Revolution veteran and the last German World War I-Era veteran" is his claim to notability, but this is the only encyclopedic fact available and could be (and is) noted at
313:
243:
his age is verified by the two newspaper articles, I added the sources, he was a member of a
Freikorps (i.e. revolutionary irregular paramilitary troops), aged 17–18, he was definitely
121:
353:
421:, wouldn't qualify for a standalone article (Jesse Langdon gets a paragraph in the main article); a paramilitary organization certainly doesn't, and he doesn't satisfy
333:
293:
162:
203:'s requirement of non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable third-party sources. Although it has been unsourced for five years, there are a few out there (such as
212:
204:
128:
17:
216:
94:
89:
506:
The consensus seems to be that being the last survivor of a famous unit is not notable on its own. Why would a lesser claim?
98:
183:
375:
266:
150:
81:
561:
40:
400:. If the claim to be the last living survivor of the 1918/19 Freikorps is accurate then I would say he is notable. --
470:
Even worse. It isn't even a single, well-defined unit. How in the world would you ever be able to prove the claim?
144:
229:
511:
475:
434:
557:
140:
36:
542:
515:
499:
479:
457:
438:
426:
409:
390:
365:
345:
325:
305:
284:
257:
234:
61:
85:
453:
405:
388:
280:
57:
422:
208:
190:
176:
224:
77:
69:
538:
507:
495:
471:
430:
361:
341:
321:
301:
253:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
556:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
449:
401:
385:
276:
53:
156:
200:
534:
491:
357:
337:
317:
297:
249:
115:
418:
487:
486:
There are documents and lists for everything in
Germany. For more info see
425:. Two newspaper articles (from the little I can read) don't seem to meet
219:; per past precedent, being the last or oldest of X is not sufficient
550:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
417:. IMO, even being the last survivor of a noted unit, say the
378:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
269:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
314:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
111:
107:
103:
384:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
175:
275:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
189:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
564:). No further edits should be made to this page.
354:list of Military-related deletion discussions
207:), but nothing that rises above the level of
8:
352:Note: This debate has been included in the
334:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
332:Note: This debate has been included in the
312:Note: This debate has been included in the
292:Note: This debate has been included in the
294:list of People-related deletion discussions
213:list of last surviving World War I veterans
351:
331:
311:
291:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
217:list of last living war veterans
410:13:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
391:03:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
366:01:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
346:01:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
326:01:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
306:01:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
285:00:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
258:00:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
235:19:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
543:17:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
516:01:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
500:00:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
480:23:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
458:09:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
439:08:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
223:for a stand-alone article.
62:03:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
581:
553:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
443:The Freikorps wasn't a
199:No evidence of meeting
393:
368:
348:
328:
308:
287:
572:
555:
383:
381:
379:
274:
272:
270:
232:
227:
221:in and of itself
209:routine coverage
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
48:The result was
34:
580:
579:
575:
574:
573:
571:
570:
569:
568:
562:deletion review
551:
394:
374:
372:
288:
265:
263:
230:
225:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
578:
576:
567:
566:
546:
545:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
483:
482:
463:
462:
461:
460:
412:
382:
371:
370:
369:
349:
329:
309:
273:
262:
261:
260:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
577:
565:
563:
559:
554:
548:
547:
544:
540:
536:
532:
529:
528:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
459:
455:
451:
446:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
392:
389:
387:
380:
377:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
290:
289:
286:
282:
278:
271:
268:
259:
255:
251:
246:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
228:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
552:
549:
530:
508:Clarityfiend
472:Clarityfiend
444:
431:Clarityfiend
414:
397:
373:
264:
244:
240:
220:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
64:
49:
47:
31:
28:
427:WP:MUSICBIO
419:Roughriders
163:free images
78:Helmut Fink
70:Helmut Fink
450:Necrothesp
423:WP:SOLDIER
402:Necrothesp
386:Sam Sailor
277:Courcelles
54:Eluchil404
558:talk page
488:Freikorps
358:• Gene93k
338:• Gene93k
318:• Gene93k
298:• Gene93k
37:talk page
560:or in a
429:either.
376:Relisted
267:Relisted
226:Canadian
205:this one
122:View log
39:or in a
535:Carrite
492:Kraxler
398:Comment
250:Kraxler
241:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
531:Delete
445:single
415:Delete
141:Google
99:delete
50:Delete
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
539:talk
512:talk
496:talk
476:talk
454:talk
435:talk
406:talk
362:talk
342:talk
322:talk
302:talk
281:talk
254:talk
231:Paul
215:and
201:WP:N
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
58:talk
245:not
191:TWL
120:– (
541:)
514:)
498:)
490:.
478:)
456:)
437:)
408:)
364:)
356:.
344:)
336:.
324:)
316:.
304:)
296:.
283:)
256:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
60:)
537:(
510:(
494:(
474:(
452:(
433:(
404:(
360:(
340:(
320:(
300:(
279:(
252:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.