203:. An article may be deleted given "rticle information that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources." An article may be deleted if "ll attempts to find reliable sources in which article information can be verified have failed." An article may not be deleted because no one feels like digging up the sources which are readily available in plenitude. —
149:, but it proves that there is at least some assertion of notability that just wasn't included in this article. Certainly, the article needs to be drastically improved, as it is not really any more than a couple of lists. However, there is certainly possibility for some improvement, and while I doubt it will ever become an
139:
This article has notability, the author was just too lazy to note it. The two bands it refers to are legitimate bands, that achieved moderate fame. While it may seem a little one-sided to
180:
115:
88:
83:
92:
75:
17:
140:
172:
153:
with the current available information, it can at least sate someone who wants to know a little about an indie rock label.-
256:
36:
123:
122:
Record label article with no independent external sources, thus no outside assertion of notability. No verifiability.
240:
221:
209:
187:
177:
an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable
157:
126:
57:
146:
255:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79:
71:
63:
143:
237:
184:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
150:
200:
48:—no new comments since relisting, and both sides have developed reasonable arguments. —
50:
205:
109:
231:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
218:
154:
171:
The label does not seem to be a major independent record label as defined by
249:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
236:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
259:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
181:notability as a commercial enterprise
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
173:Knowledge (XXG):notability (music)
24:
1:
241:18:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
58:20:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
276:
222:03:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
210:00:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
188:13:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
158:23:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
127:23:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
252:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
124:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
179:. It seems to fail
72:Higher Step Records
64:Higher Step Records
46:no consensus (keep)
243:
267:
254:
235:
233:
208:
113:
95:
34:
275:
274:
270:
269:
268:
266:
265:
264:
263:
257:deletion review
250:
229:
204:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
273:
271:
262:
261:
245:
244:
238:Carlossuarez46
234:
226:
225:
224:
217:per xDanielx.
212:
190:
185:Moonriddengirl
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
272:
260:
258:
253:
247:
246:
242:
239:
232:
228:
227:
223:
220:
216:
213:
211:
207:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
166:
159:
156:
152:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
251:
248:
230:
214:
196:
195:per Ljlego.
192:
176:
168:
136:
121:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
183:as well. --
206:xDanielx
116:View log
199:, read
89:protect
84:history
51:Deckill
219:Mathmo
197:Please
169:Delete
155:Ljlego
144:Google
93:delete
201:WP:DP
147:again
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
215:Keep
193:Keep
137:Keep
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
151:FAC
141:use
114:– (
175::
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
54:er
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.