445:
future, and the policy of the community deciding consensus rather than a patrolling admin should reign supreme. I also agree that merging / redirecting this (assuming that there is anything acceptedly sourced include) to the one notable member of the group is an acceptable outcome per ATD-R. And just to clarify, while I don't think the article passes WP:BAND, I think that a single notable member is very much enough to pass A7...ironically, if you'd based your decline on that instead of BAND, we probably wouldn't be having this discussion now  :)  ;)
333:
444:
they are different people. This suggests to me that the article is resting on having one notable member who has been in one notable ensemble, which is insufficient to pass WP:BAND. However, as I said, I'd, in any case, be in favour of this AfD, as I see them as being potentially a time-saver for the
352:
are of dubious credibility. In any case, I'm not personally averse to having these discussions, even when it might seem as if the could be bypassed. the way I see it, if we have the discussion now, and establish a consensus nice and early that an article is unsuitable for inclusion, then we can rely
465:
Actually, I had, the "WP:BAND#6" was only the last part of a comment that read something like "having one notable member makes a band significant, cf. WP:BAND#6" but somehow the first part got lost, probably because of my mouse which has been annoying me for months now with randomly selecting text
337:
731:– generally reliable but sensationalist news coverage plus a lot of celebrity gossip (and this article is in their "entertainment" rubric); mostly the same for Republika.rs and Vesti online. I think that we have a "famous for being famous" case here, three good-looking girls making a "
656:- There may be enough sources in the group's native tongue to demonstrate notability if anyone is interested in translating them. I was able to locate most of the sources listed by Richard3120 above. Also, do not confuse this group with the notable
735:" with only a couple of songs and some plans for more. Their "Irma, Maria" video has some 200k YT views, and "Feel Right" some 300k, indicating they are not terribly big hits even considering that the local market is relatively small.
362:
208:
436:"independently notable ensembles" (ZAA), not the required "two or more". Regarding the first criterion—theer might be some confusion here. Although it seems as if we have two notable members, the link for
428:
as basically demanding multiplicities to enjoin notability (i.e., one or the other, but more than one of whichever). Now, I would have suggested that the latter criterion cannot apply, as although
605:
532:
Thanks for the tip but I tried that already. It only happens infrequently and when I click once, not twice, so mechanical failure is more likely. But that is very off-topic now ;-) Regards
332:...perhaps thinking of #2? The article certainly makes grandiose (but unspecified) claims about their two singles; but the songs' success is not reflected in the sources: Both
280:
202:
466:
when I click somewhere (doubleclicking instead of singleclicking). I only noticed that the text was incomplete with TLT talkbacked me. Note to self: Buy new mouse. Regards
587:
case – the group have clearly modelled themselves on
Destiny's Child and similar R&B acts, so it wouldn't be a surprise if they did have a hit in the near future.
300:
161:
426:...contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles
572:
260:
108:
93:
578:
168:
134:
129:
397:
was the basic reasoning, i.e. if two notable members make a band notable, surely one notable member (especially considering the options of
138:
675:
121:
223:
723:. Native speaker here, but you really don't need one to assess that the coverage located by Richard3120 is of tabloid provenance.
190:
644:
569:
88:
81:
17:
511:
Slightly off-topic, but maybe you could try changing the sensitivity of your system's registering of double clicks first?
583:. The trouble is, I can't read Serbian, and I don't know how many of these sources are reliable ones. This is probably a
184:
102:
98:
575:
689:
627:
180:
782:
40:
765:
744:
709:
680:
646:
617:
596:
543:
520:
498:
491:
477:
460:
453:
446:
412:
388:
373:
366:
312:
292:
272:
252:
63:
393:
As I explained on the nominator's talk page (unfortunately they only asked me after starting this AFD), #6 of
581:
230:
671:
740:
125:
778:
613:
592:
248:
36:
565:
for now – there's nothing in
English that I can find, but there are a few bits and pieces in Serbian:
642:
216:
196:
732:
662:
516:
753:
736:
720:
704:
584:
566:
429:
344:
call there, and certainly not unjustifiable one, as much of the content, while verging on the
117:
77:
69:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
777:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
761:
657:
609:
588:
437:
308:
288:
268:
244:
637:
538:
472:
407:
345:
394:
325:
240:
527:
512:
398:
349:
354:
53:
155:
757:
304:
284:
264:
728:
533:
506:
483:
467:
419:
402:
361:, as the coverage is as limited for the band as it is for their records, i.e.
321:
441:
440:
is to a
Serbian politician of the same name; the HG's website makes it
424:, true of course. I was—unsure—whether it applied though; I read
724:
773:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
487:
340:
clearly sank without trace. Having said that, it SoWas SoWhy's
692:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
630:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
432:
is clearly notable, it appears she has only been a member of
727:
counts as a RS, but is basically the local equivalent of
606:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
490:
and receive training in reading invisible writing  :)
243:. Which I don't understand. anyhow, lack of notability
151:
147:
143:
215:
703:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
636:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
281:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
348:, is making claims of significance—even if those
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
785:). No further edits should be made to this page.
604:Note: This discussion has been included in the
299:Note: This discussion has been included in the
279:Note: This discussion has been included in the
259:Note: This discussion has been included in the
301:list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
603:
298:
278:
261:list of Music-related deletion discussions
258:
320:I would also be interested to hear from
756:for reviewing the non-English sources.
425:
353:in future on the slightly more robust
660:, the metal group from the 1980s. ---
239:Declined speedy, the rationale being
7:
401:) is sufficient to pass A7. Regards
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
328:criteria this troupe actually
1:
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
802:
766:23:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
64:22:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
745:10:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
710:16:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
681:19:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
647:11:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
618:00:58, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
597:23:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
544:15:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
521:15:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
499:13:31, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
478:13:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
454:12:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
413:12:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
374:12:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
313:11:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
293:11:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
273:11:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
253:11:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
775:Please do not modify it.
357:. Back to this article:
32:Please do not modify it.
752:per nom and thanks to
700:Is anyone !voting yet?
82:Articles for deletion
486:Note to self: Join
461:Serial Number 54129
389:Serial Number 54129
698:Relisting comment:
494:—SerialNumber54129
449:—SerialNumber54129
369:—SerialNumber54129
712:
666:
649:
620:
501:
315:
295:
275:
118:Hurricane (group)
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
70:Hurricane (group)
793:
707:
702:
695:
693:
679:
664:
658:Hurricane (band)
635:
633:
631:
531:
510:
496:
482:
464:
451:
423:
392:
371:
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
79:
61:
34:
801:
800:
796:
795:
794:
792:
791:
790:
789:
783:deletion review
713:
705:
688:
686:
661:
650:
626:
624:
525:
504:
492:
458:
447:
417:
386:
367:
176:
167:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
799:
797:
788:
787:
769:
768:
747:
701:
696:
685:
684:
683:
634:
623:
622:
621:
600:
599:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
377:
376:
317:
316:
296:
276:
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
798:
786:
784:
780:
776:
771:
770:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
715:
714:
711:
708:
699:
694:
691:
682:
677:
673:
669:
668:
659:
655:
652:
651:
648:
645:
643:
641:
640:
632:
629:
619:
615:
611:
607:
602:
601:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
579:
576:
573:
570:
567:
564:
561:
560:
545:
542:
541:
537:
536:
529:
524:
523:
522:
518:
514:
508:
503:
502:
500:
497:
495:
489:
485:
481:
480:
479:
476:
475:
471:
470:
462:
457:
456:
455:
452:
450:
443:
439:
438:Ivana Nikolić
435:
431:
427:
421:
416:
415:
414:
411:
410:
406:
405:
400:
396:
390:
385:
384:
382:
379:
378:
375:
372:
370:
364:
360:
356:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:which of the
323:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
774:
772:
754:No such user
749:
737:No such user
716:
697:
687:
663:
653:
638:
625:
562:
539:
534:
493:
473:
468:
448:
442:pretty clear
433:
408:
403:
380:
368:
363:Non-existant
358:
341:
329:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
58:
49:
47:
31:
28:
717:Weak delete
610:Richard3120
589:Richard3120
430:Sanja Vučić
338:Irma, Maria
245:TheLongTone
203:free images
733:supergroup
729:Daily Mail
721:WP:TOOSOON
665:DOOMSDAYER
639:Ritchie333
585:WP:TOOSOON
334:Feel Right
322:User:SoWhy
779:talk page
241:WP:BAND#6
37:talk page
781:or in a
690:Relisted
676:Contribs
628:Relisted
528:Adam9007
513:Adam9007
346:WP:PROMO
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
706:Lourdes
654:Comment
563:Comment
395:WP:BAND
326:WP:BAND
209:WPÂ refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
758:Ifnord
750:Delete
399:WP:ATD
359:Delete
350:claims
330:passes
305:Hhkohh
285:Hhkohh
265:Hhkohh
181:Google
139:delete
50:delete
507:SoWhy
420:SoWhy
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
762:talk
741:talk
725:Blic
672:Talk
614:talk
593:talk
517:talk
336:and
309:talk
289:talk
269:talk
249:talk
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
54:ansh
719:as
667:520
540:Why
488:MI5
474:Why
434:one
409:Why
383::)
231:TWL
160:– (
59:666
764:)
743:)
616:)
608:.
595:)
580:,
577:,
574:,
571:,
568:,
535:So
519:)
469:So
404:So
365:.
355:G4
311:)
303:.
291:)
283:.
271:)
263:.
251:)
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
760:(
739:(
678:)
674:|
670:(
612:(
591:(
530::
526:@
515:(
509::
505:@
484:​
463::
459:@
422::
418:@
391::
387:@
381:*
342:*
307:(
287:(
267:(
247:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.