274:. Just go to Google News and search "Hyatt Regency Portland", you'll see sufficient secondary coverage. I've shared some on the article's talk page. You seem to have nominated a whole series of properties indiscriminately. Next time please complete enough research before submitting deletion nominations. ---
233:: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability."
198:
366:. There's extensive coverage for this convention center hotel even before it was built as part of the Lloyd District Development Strategy in the early 00s, and even farther back as part of the
301:
in the least (and the talkpage sourcing is basically the convention center being built rather than the hotel), and I thank the nom for finally tackling this generic metro business hotel cruft.
192:
159:
250:
106:
132:
127:
91:
136:
119:
338:
the convention center. They go as far back as 2012 as this specific property has been in the news for years, often related to public funding. ---
213:
180:
429:
and similar to various other notable hotels in major US cities. Has enough history of its own to be a notable historical hotel.
86:
79:
17:
408:
Public financing issues make this a matter of public concern. Reliable sources exist, article is being expanded/improved. -
391:
Meets our notability guidelines with SIGCOV. The hotel has 600 rooms and RS - the hotel is notable. I added a few sources
174:
297:
This is a generic Hyatt which barely opened, notwithstanding its financing. To the above, I don't feel like this meets
455:
438:
417:
400:
383:
353:
325:
289:
262:
242:
123:
100:
96:
61:
346:
282:
170:
472:
40:
367:
298:
220:
434:
238:
115:
67:
468:
413:
339:
275:
36:
374:
station plans in the late 80s. In terms of the city's planning history, it's not your generic Hyatt. --
396:
186:
379:
316:
258:
206:
430:
234:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
467:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
426:
409:
230:
392:
446:- while Hyatt hotels are not inherently notable, the sourcing does show just enough for
450:
375:
371:
304:
254:
57:
447:
229:
There is nothing notable about this hotel and it fails the following requirement per
153:
53:
463:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
145:
141:
205:
334:
Talk page sources are about the hotel specifically,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:). No further edits should be made to this page.
249:Note: This discussion has been included in the
219:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
270:Disclaimer: Stub creator. This one's easy.
251:list of Oregon-related deletion discussions
248:
7:
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
456:13:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
439:05:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
418:17:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
401:17:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
384:21:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
354:19:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
326:19:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
290:18:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
263:18:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
243:17:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
62:04:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
492:
465:Please do not modify it.
368:Oregon Convention Center
32:Please do not modify it.
272:Strong and speedy keep
116:Hyatt Regency Portland
68:Hyatt Regency Portland
80:Articles for deletion
323:
299:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
265:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
483:
453:
362:Leaning towards
349:
342:
341:Another Believer
324:
319:
313:
312:
307:
285:
278:
277:Another Believer
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:deletion review
451:
352:
347:
340:
317:
310:
305:
302:
288:
283:
276:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
478:
477:
459:
458:
441:
420:
403:
386:
372:MAX Light Rail
359:
358:
357:
356:
344:
329:
328:
292:
280:
267:
266:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
474:
470:
466:
461:
460:
457:
454:
449:
445:
442:
440:
436:
432:
431:Ambrosiawater
428:
424:
421:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
355:
350:
343:
337:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
322:
320:
309:
308:
300:
296:
293:
291:
286:
279:
273:
269:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
235:Wikiwriter700
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
464:
462:
443:
422:
410:Pete Forsyth
405:
388:
363:
335:
314:
303:
294:
271:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
193:free images
393:Lightburst
469:talk page
452:Spiderone
427:WP:SIGCOV
376:truflip99
255:Shellwood
231:WP:NBUILD
37:talk page
471:or in a
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
318:chatter
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
448:WP:GNG
425:Meets
295:Delete
171:Google
137:delete
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
444:Keep
435:talk
423:Keep
414:talk
406:Keep
397:talk
389:Keep
380:talk
364:Keep
348:Talk
306:Nate
284:Talk
259:talk
239:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
54:ST47
50:keep
336:not
221:TWL
158:– (
437:)
416:)
399:)
382:)
261:)
253:.
241:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
433:(
412:(
395:(
378:(
370:/
351:)
345:(
321:)
315:(
311:•
287:)
281:(
257:(
237:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.