327:
I believe that gives it notability on the
English Knowledge. However, I know that the vast majority of people would not agree, and even though there is no way to conclusively prove who is right (because it's entirely opinion), the simple fact that more people will say "Delete" means that the page will be deleted. This is exactly what I meant by "elitist": exclusion of articles based on subject matter that is not English, or to the majority, have no notability.
326:
It's simply a commentary on the current situation, as well as the reasons why this article is up for deletion. Notability is wholly subjective, and since
Knowledge is not "the American Encyclopedia" or "the English-speaking World's Encyclopedia," if it is important somewhere in the world (Japan) then
287:
By "elitist" I refer to the increasing standards of preconceived notability that have been increasingly appearing in arguments from deletionists. I do not mean to force editors into separate camps, but in general, I have noticed a massive upswing in the number of AfD's based on "notability" which is
262:
as suggested above. Bringing these articles here as a device to force a merge is an misuse of deletion policy, just as much as redirecting them without discussion is. The place to discuss is the article talk page. It will be clear enough there that there will be support for a merge of articles like
352:: I failed to notice that all of these noms were from TTN, someone known for making sweeping article deletion noms (both individually and in groups). He's been reprimanded for it in the past. Hopefully this is not a repeat of that stupidity. ···
90:
85:
94:
77:
166:
123:
310:
frankly then I am unclear why you commented delete, as this seems an argument for keep--unless "by not bother defending it" you mean despair at arresting the tendency
192:
This one can go too. Not going to bother defending it. It was written during a time when
Knowledge was more inclusive before it turned into a more elitist database.
81:
367:
He was reprimanded more for unilateral redirections, without discussion, on a much larger scale. Having him come to AfD is exactly what was asked of him. —
288:
itself a very subjective criteria. I do not seek an elitist encyclopedia; the whole reason why I came to
Knowledge in the first place was because it was
73:
65:
401:
376:
358:
336:
321:
301:
278:
254:
237:
219:
201:
181:
155:
59:
246:
17:
389:
47:
416:
36:
415:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
397:
332:
297:
207:
197:
267:
encyclopedia. If one wants an elitist site, one should look elsewhere--there are a number of candidates.
372:
250:
177:
328:
293:
193:
215:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
368:
173:
353:
317:
274:
232:
151:
139:
211:
143:
135:
53:
111:
393:
131:
231:
back to main series article or a series article on the ships of the series. ···
263:
this. Incidentally, Knowledge is definitely not an "elitist" database, but a
312:
269:
147:
292:
elitist, but this characteristic seems to be slowly disappearing.
409:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118:
107:
103:
99:
167:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:). No further edits should be made to this page.
134:independent of its series. Without coverage in
8:
245:"List of ships from (german title here)"
165:: This debate has been included in the
74:Hyperion (Legend of the Galactic Heroes)
66:Hyperion (Legend of the Galactic Heroes)
130:This fictional ship does not establish
7:
392:or an appropriate subtopic thereof.
138:, it is just made up of unnecessary
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
402:10:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
377:14:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
359:05:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
337:09:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
322:17:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
302:08:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
279:15:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
255:08:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
238:06:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
220:14:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
202:08:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
182:20:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
156:15:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
60:13:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
390:Legend of the Galactic Heroes
48:Legend of the Galactic Heroes
136:reliable third party sources
436:
412:Please do not modify it.
206:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
210:. It is listed now.
44:The result was
184:
170:
144:original research
427:
414:
356:
235:
171:
161:
121:
115:
97:
56:
34:
435:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
425:
424:
423:
417:deletion review
410:
354:
233:
117:
88:
72:
69:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
433:
431:
422:
421:
405:
404:
382:
381:
380:
379:
362:
361:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
305:
304:
282:
281:
257:
240:
225:
224:
223:
222:
186:
185:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
432:
420:
418:
413:
407:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
383:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
357:
351:
348:
347:
338:
334:
330:
329:the_one092001
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
314:
309:
308:
307:
306:
303:
299:
295:
294:the_one092001
291:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
271:
266:
265:comprehensive
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
239:
236:
230:
227:
226:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
194:the_one092001
191:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
168:
164:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
408:
385:
349:
311:
289:
268:
264:
259:
242:
228:
189:
162:
140:plot summary
129:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
369:Quasirandom
247:70.51.8.158
174:Quasirandom
208:incomplete
132:notability
46:merge to
124:View log
350:Comment
243:Mergeto
212:DumbBOT
91:protect
86:history
55:MBisanz
394:Stifle
190:Delete
119:delete
95:delete
386:Merge
260:Merge
229:Merge
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
398:talk
373:talk
333:talk
318:talk
298:talk
275:talk
251:talk
216:talk
198:talk
178:talk
163:Note
152:talk
142:and
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
388:to
355:日本穣
313:DGG
290:not
270:DGG
234:日本穣
169:.
148:TTN
400:)
375:)
335:)
320:)
300:)
277:)
253:)
218:)
200:)
180:)
154:)
146:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
51:.
396:(
371:(
331:(
316:(
296:(
273:(
249:(
214:(
196:(
176:(
172:—
150:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.