543:*about* the *company*. The "Fake Margin Calls" articles has no in-depth information about the company other than generic information such as where there HQ is located. Repeating what the company told its customers, quotes, etc, is not "Independent Content". The article about the company getting fined is based on a press release for a total of 7 sentences, none of which provide any in-depth information. The first source about the class action simply regurgitates court documents and is not "Independent Content" and the other source is also not Independent Content as it relies on commentary from the lawfirm filing the case.
592:. Simply that the company be addressed directly and in-depth by independent sources. A lot of the article is quotes from either the company or from lawyers investigating initiating a class action against the company (i.e., not independent). What is left over is not the company being addressed directly and in-depth.
412:
The Knews article is about IC Markets (EU) Ltd which is registered in Cyprus, so not sure it is completely relevant to this article as this is about an
Australian entity. That aside this isn't really SIGCIV "addressing the subject of the article directly and in
361:
438:
The news about the
Cypriot entity is relevant as the current article also provides information about the operations outside Australia. This probably has to be rewritten to clarify the connections between such entities though.
189:
362:
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/ic-markets-faces-a-class-action-over-derivatives-trading-alleging-investors-lost-hundreds-of-millions/news-story/37f1486f983b238d32458f6566a99420
689:
52:
47:
42:
146:
517:. The subject doesn't necessarily need to be the source's main topic if it's covered directly and in detail, which is the case for the four news articles from my list.
355:
265:
261:
183:
257:
661:. Most of the coverage reviewed seem too routine to contribute to NCORP. I also place lower weight on discussing alleged illegal conduct on the same basis.
228:. In keeping with almost all the sources being paid PR, the article is heavily promotional. I don't see that anything has changed since the last deletion.
93:
78:
37:
373:
349:
588:, thanks for that. Given what is covered in that article I don't see that it adds to the notability of the company taking into the requirements of
645:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
253:
406:
The second SMH article mentions them in passing three times. There is no SIGCOV "addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth".
367:
356:
https://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/sock-puppets-and-lifeline-ads-welcome-to-the-wild-world-of-copy-trading-20201210-p56maf.html
453:
Even if it is of any relevance, there's no SIGCOV "addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth" in that article.
670:
575:
73:
66:
17:
119:
114:
674:
653:
609:
579:
549:
526:
504:
470:
448:
433:
390:
337:
320:
285:
245:
123:
204:
171:
150:
106:
87:
83:
328:, it could do with more references, but is a notable company within this industry and should be updated not deleted.
374:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-01-26/icmarkets-andrew-budzinski-class-action-alleges-misled-investors/103388158
350:
https://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/fake-margin-calls-forex-traders-furious-after-losses-20150127-12ypsm.html
563:
165:
535:
criteria for establishing notability, not whether you think they are SIGCOV compliant. We require in-depth
647:. TarnishedPath has provided an analsys of the sourcing above, none of which meets GNG/NCORP criteria.
161:
694:
416:
The ABC article looks fine. I'm not seeing enough here, but then I can't see the
Australian article.
368:
https://knews.kathimerini.com.cy/en/business/cysec-slaps-a-%E2%82%AC200-000-fine-on-ic-markets-eu-ltd
666:
640:
571:
197:
211:
594:
480:
455:
418:
305:
270:
230:
500:
333:
62:
636:
628:
540:
514:
492:
488:
396:
225:
643:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include
624:
589:
536:
532:
522:
444:
400:
386:
221:
110:
224:. Almost all of the available sources seem to be paid PR. Those that aren't paid PR lack
177:
662:
632:
585:
567:
566:), among other means. I will reserve comment on the rest of the issue to a later date.
409:
I can't access The
Australian article, because it's behind a paywall. No comment there.
683:
648:
544:
395:
The first SMH article is mostly quoting or attributing statements to IC. This is not
300:
496:
329:
296:
292:
140:
518:
491:. I will try to have a deeper look but struggled to find anything on my first
484:
440:
382:
102:
27:
399:"addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth" as required by
511:
Sock puppets and
Lifeline ads: Welcome to the wild world of copy trading
509:
Actually, all of the articles suggested by me (except for the
531:
The question we need to consider is whether they meet GNG/
136:
132:
128:
196:
690:
AfD debates (Organisation, corporation, or product)
558:For anyone with TWL bundle access, the article in
53:Articles for deletion/IC Markets (4th nomination)
48:Articles for deletion/IC Markets (3rd nomination)
43:Articles for deletion/IC Markets (2nd nomination)
252:Note: This discussion has been included in the
210:
8:
303:as editors involved in the last discussion.
94:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
251:
345:, plenty of mainstream media coverage:
35:
641:in-depth information *on the company*
7:
487:'s suggested articles actually meet
220:I can't see that the article passes
24:
623:This is a company therefore GNG/
256:lists for the following topics:
79:Introduction to deletion process
38:Articles for deletion/IC Markets
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
675:15:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
654:15:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
627:requires at least two deep or
610:03:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
580:14:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
550:15:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
527:09:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
505:01:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
471:12:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
449:09:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
434:09:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
391:09:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
338:04:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
321:12:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
286:12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
246:12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
562:is available via ProQuest (
69:(AfD)? Read these primers!
711:
33:AfDs for this article:
539:"Independent Content"
151:edits since nomination
637:"Independent Content"
67:Articles for deletion
288:
84:Guide to deletion
74:How to contribute
702:
254:deletion sorting
215:
214:
200:
144:
126:
64:
710:
709:
705:
704:
703:
701:
700:
699:
680:
679:
157:
117:
101:
98:
61:
58:
57:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
708:
706:
698:
697:
692:
682:
681:
678:
677:
656:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
560:The Australian
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
414:
410:
407:
404:
379:
378:
377:
376:
370:
364:
358:
352:
340:
323:
289:
218:
217:
154:
97:
96:
91:
81:
76:
59:
56:
55:
50:
45:
40:
34:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
707:
696:
693:
691:
688:
687:
685:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
657:
655:
652:
651:
646:
642:
638:
634:
631:sources with
630:
626:
622:
619:
618:
611:
608:
607:
606:
603:
600:
597:
591:
587:
583:
582:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
551:
548:
547:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:by SMH) meet
512:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
481:TarnishedPath
478:
472:
469:
468:
467:
464:
461:
458:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
432:
431:
430:
427:
424:
421:
415:
411:
408:
405:
402:
398:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
381:
380:
375:
371:
369:
365:
363:
359:
357:
353:
351:
347:
346:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
322:
319:
318:
317:
314:
311:
308:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
284:
283:
282:
279:
276:
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
243:
242:
239:
236:
233:
227:
223:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
152:
148:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
95:
92:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
71:
70:
68:
63:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
29:
26:
19:
658:
649:
644:
620:
604:
601:
598:
595:
593:
559:
545:
510:
465:
462:
459:
456:
454:
428:
425:
422:
419:
417:
342:
325:
315:
312:
309:
306:
304:
280:
277:
274:
271:
269:
240:
237:
234:
231:
229:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
60:
695:AfD debates
635:containing
633:each source
629:significant
483:, none of @
184:free images
684:Categories
564:2912082870
103:IC Markets
28:IC Markets
663:Alpha3031
586:Alpha3031
568:Alpha3031
541:WP:ORGIND
515:WP:SIGCOV
493:WP:BEFORE
489:WP:SIGCOV
397:WP:SIGCOV
291:Pinging @
266:Australia
262:Companies
226:WP:SIGCOV
650:HighKing
639:showing
625:WP:NCORP
590:WP:NCORP
546:HighKing
537:WP:NCORP
533:WP:NCORP
401:WP:NCORP
301:HighKing
222:WP:NCORP
147:View log
88:glossary
497:Cabrils
413:depth".
330:Sargdub
297:Cabrils
293:LibStar
264:, and
258:Finance
190:WP refs
178:scholar
120:protect
115:history
65:New to
659:Delete
621:Delete
162:Google
124:delete
519:Vgbyp
485:Vgbyp
479:Per @
441:Vgbyp
383:Vgbyp
299:and @
205:JSTOR
166:books
141:views
133:watch
129:links
16:<
605:Path
523:talk
501:talk
466:Path
445:talk
429:Path
387:talk
343:Keep
334:talk
326:Keep
316:Path
281:Path
241:Path
198:FENS
172:news
137:logs
111:talk
107:edit
602:hed
599:nis
596:Tar
463:hed
460:nis
457:Tar
426:hed
423:nis
420:Tar
313:hed
310:nis
307:Tar
295:, @
278:hed
275:nis
272:Tar
238:hed
235:nis
232:Tar
212:TWL
145:– (
686::
673:)
669:•
578:)
574:•
525:)
503:)
495:.
447:)
389:)
372:-
366:-
360:-
354:-
348:-
336:)
268:.
260:,
192:)
149:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
671:c
667:t
665:(
584:@
576:c
572:t
570:(
521:(
499:(
443:(
403:.
385:(
332:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
143:)
105:(
90:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.